Media Responsibility and the Privacy of Public Personalities Few people can forget the story of Anthony Wiener, the bright young lawmaker from New York who was on his way to political greatness. He was articulate, media-savvy and was espousing a modern brand of politics that many people shared…
Soon, the women were being interviewed by the tabloids, Anthony Wiener’s wife was being deluged by reporters, their family peace was shattered. Everywhere, one sees stories of the media trying to outscoop each other in scraping the bottom of the barrel, so to speak, and extracting information about, or even against celebrities, in order to profit. They then invoke the blanket right of press freedom and the Constitutional guarantee of free expression in order to absolve themselves from liability. Those who say that the media should be restrained give several examples of media irresponsibility. Indeed, it is extremely difficult to dispute examples of not only celebrities, but also ordinary people whose lives have been thrown apart by severe media incursions. Nothing is sacred anymore, privacy has become a value of the past. Even the most private confines of one’s home can become fodder for tomorrow’s newspapers. As a result, celebrity endorsements can be lost (Gorman 1247). With Twitter and other social networking sites, it has become even worse. Everyone is a journalist, and it becomes easier for professional journalists to zero in on what is newsworthy. As stated by Felcher and Rubin (1577), this kind of publicity against real people can “disrupt their lives, hurt their feelings, or decrease their ability to profit from their names, likeness or other attributes.” However, this paper will argue that there are more disadvantages than advantages when one censors the media. Indeed, the costs of curtailing free speech outweigh the putative benefits of reining in abusive journalists and protecting the privacy of celebrities. This paper will talk about this on three levels. Firstly, this paper will consider it from the Constitutional principle of free speech, arguing that the freedom of expression of the press is one of the bedrocks of a thriving democracy. Secondly, it will argue that the media still remains to be one of the potent mechanisms against abusive public officials and that the risks of public officials abusing their office have greater damage on society than media professionals who abuse their profession. Finally, it will argue that there are corrective remedies to curb media wrongdoing that do not have to involve outright censorship. Free speech as the bedrock of democracy and human rights Free speech remains to be one of the firmest firmaments of democracy. It is usually the first to be taken away when a dictator wants to install himself into power as a free and healthy press is an important indicator of a free and healthy republic. According to Ira Glasser, who was the director of the American Civil Liberties Union, people often fail to realize that when government regulates speech, panoply of First Amendment issues comes to the fore. He states: “Liberals and Democrats have been the chief offenders in this scenario, favoring equity in the abstract but never seeing how the particular reforms they advocated made the problems they wished to remedy worse, and never seeing that giving the government the authority” (2). Free speech is not always the easiest thing to defend. In fact, in many circumstances, our gut tells us that it should be suppressed in favor of some other social policy. An example of this is the notorious case of Citizens United. By way of brief background, the case takes root in 2008 when a non-profit corporation, Citizens United, released a documentary entitled “ ...
Cite this document
(“Media Responsibility and the Privacy of Public Personalities Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/70458-topic-after-watching-the-video-license-to-blame
(Media Responsibility and the Privacy of Public Personalities Research Paper)
“Media Responsibility and the Privacy of Public Personalities Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/70458-topic-after-watching-the-video-license-to-blame.
websites that aren't knowingly hosting pirated content”.1 This opposition has caused vast protests last January 18, 2012 from more than 7,000 websites that involved the giant names of Google, Mozilla and Reddit. 2 The social media sites were bombarded with what the public has to say about the SOPA.
It will further tie in the media and its influence on society, which has an effect on an individual’s life who resorts to suicide. The paper will also show how has the writing styles changed for the worse in the last decade even comparing them from the 1800s, and it will provide some statistical data on suicide cases. The presence of social media particularly social networking sites has come along with many virtues and vices.
The evolution of social media landscape: Scope and Impact 8 2.3. Impact of innovations in social media on public relations practice 14 2.4. Use of social media by PR in crisis situation: Impact and consequences 15 3. Methodology 19 4. Analysis 24 5. Conclusion 26 List of tables References 1.
The most popular social networks include Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace among many others. The users of forms of media are ever increasing daily with Facebook having the majority of users followed Twitter. The popularity of social media results from ability of users to share content (Massey 3).
There are different forms of social a media and the prominent ones are face book, twitter, Wikipedia, linkedin and Reddit. Public relations can be described as an activity or job where in sequence about the activities of an organization to the public so as to have good image.
The losses incurred by the organization were quite huge but it was able to arrest the situation eventually. This paper will explore the reporting of the oil spill by media houses and how the company reacted to the crisis.
The type of media covering the crisis
t sustain an exception, a defendant (frequently) can hold off conviction by moving to nullify any evidence that the state may have obtained via the warrantless search. U.S. laws relating to search and seizure admit that warrantless entry is reasonable under sufficient exigent
However, this is more of a conceptual framework; different individuals view motivation and satisfaction from different perspectives; wages and opportunities and every personality can develop an approach more suited to their traits.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Media Responsibility and the Privacy of Public Personalities for FREE!