Of 5 different online sources - Annotated Bibliography Example

Is it OK To Lower the Drinking Age from 21 to 18? An Annotated Bibliography Associated Press. “College Presidents Seek to Lower Drinking Age.” Foxnews.com. Fox News. 18 Aug. 2008. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.This press release talks of college presidents drawn from 100 best universities in the US seeking for the lowering of the drinking age. Their sharply criticized push is guided by federal records showing that 157 college students aged between 18 and 23 drank to death between 1999 and 2005. With no much maturity difference between 18 and 21, lowering the legal drinking age would expose students to responsible drinking at a younger age such that they would not freak out in college and engage in irresponsible drinking habits that has seen a culture of clandestine, dangerous binge-drinking on the high in colleges.

Cary, Mary Kate. “Time to Lower the Drinking Age.” Usnews.com. US News. 7 May 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.In this article, Cary reflects back in history when the legal drinking age was 18. With regular patrols by the university police, students drank responsibly. Being among the 7 minority countries with a high legal drinking age of 21, task forces aimed at solving the problems of alcohol and drug abuse in colleges would not bear fruit; lowering the drinking age would. The writer concludes with remarks of preference of seeing her child drink in a well-patrolled environment than letting the child drink in secret ending up binge drinking and drug-overdosing among other vices.

Engs, Ruth C. Why drinking Age Should be lowered: An Opinion Based upon Research. 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2014. http://www.indiana.edu/~engs/articles/cqoped.htmlSupported by evidence from research conducted for over twenty years, Engs in this article argues for the lowering of the legal drinking age to 18. Engs attributes the irresponsible drinking among many of the college students to the perception of drinking as “adulthood” and “rebellion against authority.” Similar prohibition laws failed twice in the 1920s and 1850s, hence no need to go back to them again.

Citing the examples of Greeks, Italians, Chinese and Jews, the drinking age should be lowered, accompanied by appropriate education, so as to quash the notion of alcohol as poison and promote responsible drinking behaviors across all age groups.Griggs, Brandon. “Should the U.S. Lower its Drinking Age?” Cnn.com. CNN. 16 Jul. 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.In support of lowering the legal drinking age, Griggs reports on the argument by Professor Dwight B. Health of Brown University that the younger the people start drinking, the safer they become, citing cultural models of countries like Italy and France.

Through this, parents get to educate their children on alcohol and deter children from irresponsible drinking behaviors. According to Griggs, Professor Heath argues that the “’forbidden fruit’ syndrome” promotes irresponsible drinking with the drinking age banned to 21. Therefore, the US should opt out of the minority countries with higher drinking age and join the majority who have the drinking age as low as 16 and promote alcohol-education before age 18.Riverton, Lena Wammer. “Lower Legal Drinking Age to 18.

” Dailyranger.com. The Ranger. 14 Jan. 2014. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.In support of lowering the legal drinking age to 18, this article points out the irony of the Constitution allowing anyone aged 18 and above to make independent decisions and enter into legal contracts but the law prohibiting the same persons from purchasing or drinking alcohol. The article further discredits the argument for decrease in drinking and driving following the 1987 legislation of 21 as the legal drinking age as this tendency started as early as 1980 due to education programs, safer automobiles and lowered speed limits among other factors.

Being a “forbidden fruit” according to Riverton makes the underage want to consume more. Lowering the drinking age would make alcohol consumption less appealing.