Euthanasia Name: Instructor: Task: Date: Euthanasia refers to the medical method of terminating someone’s life under deliberate circumstances. It is vital to note that such an act is painless way of terminating one’s life in case the referred individual is suffering from a chronic and a progressive disease…
This position will be arguable from various points. To begin with, the right to life is one of the universal laws. This means that individuals possess the entitlement to live at all costs. However, this is a fundamental argument that does not address issues further than the same. It is arguable that the previous lives relied on fundamental laws in order to steer their vast lives. This helped compromise on a significant part of their lives. A possible example concerns with the concentration in trade that triggered creating laws on associations and trade. This is because the world was moving from the agricultural age to industrial one. This recognizes the fact that advancement of society requires legislations of new laws in order to accommodate the same (Forman & Scumann, 2008). In these laws, there was the recognition that there was more to life than just the same. This means that quality of life was more vital than survival. Individuals underwent substantial suppression in the event of satisfying the fundamental entitlement of life. Their cases of oppression became invalid to the respective governments as long as they had their life. This means that when quality of life ceases, it becomes rational to seek other ways (White, 2005). In the cases of individuals, who are under substantial pain and chronic illness, they deserve termination of lives. In most cases, individuals consent to their deaths. This refers to the concept of assisted death. In archaic sense, individuals’ rights were based on their relation to the societal sense. This means that society first received its entitlements before the individuals acquired the same. However, society has been known to be an abstract term that does not entail substantial information about the same. This led to the jeopardy of individuals’ life for the sake of society’s heritage (Dyck, 2005). The focus of the new strategy regarded a focus on individuals’ scenarios. This led to the elimination of the idea that all individuals could hold the same rights. In turn, legal bodies enhanced laws for specific scenarios and individuals. In this case, even legal entities had their laws that could deviate from the main legal requirements of the country or governable units. In turn, individuals may consent to their own termination of life. In this case, one’s personal rights surpassed national laws that could jeopardize one’s own quality of life. It is vital to note that one’s won personal reasons would be valid because they would request for euthanasia. In fair legal scenarios, national laws would be invalid in guiding such scenarios because such individuals would not live with satisfaction. In addition, it is vital to consider the scenario and the rights of family members in case of relatives in case of relatives in indeterminable coma. In such cases, such family members share deep financial and psychological stress (Gorsuch, 2009). The patients do not face any psychological stress since they would be in numb states. The problem of such scenarios concerns the fact that medicine describes life as a simple life of breathing. It is notable that most patients, in indeterminable coma, never rise up to life again. In such situations, relatives bear financial burden that would rive them to debts. Most governments, who enforce the right to life, would not subsidize such fees. In addition, the families face psychological str ...
Cite this document
(“The Right to Euthanasia for the Terminally Ill Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/71070-the-right-to-euthanasia-for-the-terminally-ill
(The Right to Euthanasia for the Terminally Ill Essay)
“The Right to Euthanasia for the Terminally Ill Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/71070-the-right-to-euthanasia-for-the-terminally-ill.
Many epidemic diseases are under control and with the life saving drugs around, many excruciating illness have been eradicated. Apart from all these advancements, there are few issues which need to be discussed and need a crucial decision when it comes on choosing death by himself/herself or by a family for a terminally ill patient.
There are a plethora of perspectives which must be considered and this paper will shed light upon the most important perspectives. No religion in the world would vouch for assisted suicides as it is a huge sin to bring your life to an end and it is an even bigger sin to help someone die but in the case of terminally ill people it is a different story.
Euthanasia means taking one’s life with the help of a doctor by giving injected poisonous medicines or otherwise. According to common beliefs, a person has no right to take the life of other at whatever circumstances. And law treats euthanasia as a punishable act as it involves taking one’s life.
However, active euthanasia is undertaken on an individual only when his or her doctors and family members agree and make the decision to kill actively to end the agony suffered by their loved one. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, lets the suffering person die by withholding the necessary medical care and allowing the disease to kill the person instead of a fellow human being.
Euthanasia is probably one of the most controversial issues in the world today due to the legal and ethical considerations that surround it; many people and groups have taken divisive stands concerning this matter and universal consensus regarding the execution of this policy is yet to be achieved.
James Rachels has argues that under certain circumstances active euthanasia should be morally permissible and this is a very sound argument. Many times we let people die; famine is a classic example of the same. Rachels emphasizes on killing Vs letting die argument and this
Euthanasia refers to the practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or incurable disease by either lethal injection or suspension of the treatment. Euthanasia is intentional killing
(Seamus Cavan Sean Dolan, 2000) suggested that Euthanasia means easy death or death without any pain.
In other words, it is the process whereby somebody is intentionally killed just to save him or her from one form of agony to another. The fact that the person
Literally translated, therefore, the term Euthanasia means the good death. Euthanasia is a debatable ethical issue because it seems to violate individual’s right to life, on the one hand, and on the other
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Right to Euthanasia for the Terminally Ill for FREE!