Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - Essay Example

? Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Palestinians have remained fragile and naive in the hands of Israeli forces. In order to understand this relationship between the Israel and Palestine, one needs to look into the conditions that gave rise to the conflict. The Israelis were long exiled as a punishment from God according to the Scriptures but little by little they rose to power discretely claiming the lands they once used to reside through undeniable means. The small community of Jews who were patriotic in their mission combined to form Jewish nationalism which came to be known as Zionism. This movement spread in many spheres of Jewish life such as culture, religion, secularism, politics, labor and revisionism. The spread of this kind of nationalism came to the world as a surprised and shock the foundations of several other religious forces such as Islam and Christianity which considered Israelis to be a thing of the past. The arrival of the Zionist forces in the mainstream politics and religion gave way to businessmen especially in the field of agriculture and farming (Beinin & Stein 2006). This was the start of the Jewish settlement in their ancient regions or what they called their homeland. Israeli-Palestinian conflict has its roots both in politics and in religion. Ever since the war of 1948, the Israelis have outnumbered the Palestinians in Jerusalem leading to an intrusion of the Zionists in the Palestinian politics which caused a severe damage to the established structure. Both Palestinian Muslims and Christians were affected by this invasion which came to them as a shock. It is Zionism which is keeping the Israelis to fight for their entire life. One wonders whether the Israeli Zionism had taken an extremist approach towards attaining the land or had the opposing force, that is, the Palestinian Nationalist Movement become ineffective (Caplan 2010). Palestinians seem to have a stunted growth in the hands of the Israeli forces in the social, economic and political spheres. Most of the Arab population in Israel became internal refugees who had little to voice out for their rights. The high fertility rates and the decreasing mortality rates increased the Palestinian citizens to six-fold ever since the establishment of Israel (Dowty 2004). The places of exile were perfect for the Israeli’s to settle. Babylon and Egypt are regions full of resources and riches. But it was religion which drove the Jews towards the Holy Land of Jerusalem. It goes without saying that the means adopted by the Israeli forces to date are highly illegal although the Arab neighboring nations are not reciprocating the way they should be doing politically (Dowty 2004). Unfortunately countless number of people are killed ruthlessly every passing day. Many billions have already died in the past but the issue of Palestine remains until the followers of all the main religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam come together to put some sense into each other. It is also observed that when the solutions are presented for the conflict between the two nations there is a one sided image portrayed greatly depending upon the opinions of the UN, British, American or Israeli government. The conflict worsened as the Israeli forces pushed them next to the Arab state so that it could meet a larger end. The agreement to join hands with the opposing party meant a great deal of chaos. This was however overlooked because Israel’s demand for the partition depended upon the initial behavior of the Palestinians when they first offered some joint endeavor (Beinin & Stein 2006). On being interviewed for the New York Times in Paris, Mahmud Darwish, the “poetic voice of Palestine” who was awarded the Lannan Foundation Prize for Cultural Freedom, says quite helplessly and innocently that he fails to choose his own reality because he feels that instead of having a peaceful and serene mind to write poetry his poetry is colored with a constant tension of bloodshed, fire and occupation. The feeling has grown so much over each and every Palestinian exile that he believes that they are rather addicted to this notion of exile. Speaking on behalf of all the Palestinians, he claims that the U.S. call for war especially after the September 11 attack is not the clash of cultures but purely a political war and the main problem that keeps the Palestinians at disparity with the enemies is not their lifestyle but their double standards (Beinin & Stein 2006). The above mentioned issues still remain among the two nations. Palestinians were conveniently swept away from politics especially those who had a business approach to politics. Since the regions of occupation are of interest for all the three religions there is no reason why the people should be callously treated. With the end of World War II there were more than sixty thousand Jews who entered the land and started taking over the farmers and Bedouins who induced fear among the Jews for causing disturbance in the hierarchy the Muslims (ProCon.org 2004). Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Jordan came to the rescue of Palestine. The war of 1948 was fought bravely and with complexity. But this led to a series of events which threatened the entire Arab world and indirectly affected the political structure bringing them to a rapid decline. The powerful Israeli forces refused to stop at this point because it was only the beginning for them. The Palestinian population living in the Israel is in segregation with the Jewish community. Hence they have undergone a conspicuous modernization process reflected especially in the field of education (Dowty 2004). Israel must recognize one critical point that whatever maybe the solution of these problems, any decade long period of war can bring peace in one of the deprived nations provided that they go according to according to the legitimate international law which can keep strong moral ground for the generations to come. This is crucial for any kind of nationalism to reside in a country. Realities need to be faced by the world instead of being swept under the rug. Critics must understand that people in the Arab world are more deprived than their counterpart. Israelis ask for aid from America and Britain (ProCon.org 2004). They should be ready to ask for the same thing from the already existing forced such as the Arabs and Palestinians. The Palestinians will not be getting any kind of national security in a single state dominated by the Jews and surprisingly the Jews are never going to have democracy, inner harmony or for that matter approval from the world for as long as they continue to obstruct the rights of the Palestinians. The conflict is so sensitive that it may arise at any foolish thing related to settlement (ProCon.org 2004). References Beinin, J., Stein, R. L., & Middle East Research & Information Project. (2006). The struggle for sovereignty: Palestine and Israel, 1993-2005. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. Caplan, N. (2010). The Israel-Palestine conflict: Contested histories. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell. ProCon.org (Organization). (2004). ProCon.org: Pros and cons of controversial issues. Santa Monica, CA: ProCon.org. Dowty, A. (2004). Critical issues in Israeli society. Westport, Conn, Praeger. Read More