My experience in writing - Essay Example

In his writing process, he addressed different audiences from essay one to essay three. I had the mandate of addressing an academic audience in the controversy essay and the general audience on the public argument essay. As such, in addressing the different audience distinct writing techniques had to apply. In the academic audience, I dedicated my time and works to informing audience on the different controversies that exist I relation to reference topic. For example, I shared the arguments and counterarguments on increasing fuel prices with an aim of reducing global warming.

This I did with an open mind, gave facts, and assumed a neutral position. In addressing, the public on the public argument essay, I changed the vision of my audience by using a convincing tone to make them support my views. I did this by narrowing my information to a shorter topic befitting my position. For instance, I detailed all the benefits of increasing fuel prices for purposes of controlling global warming. Moreover, the two audiences adopted distinct introductions. Indeed, I used facts and background information to address the academic audience in the introduction of the second essay.

Furthermore, the context of the information changed with the audience. For example, in the public argument essay, the context changed to only the benefits of increasing fuel prices. Actually, in this context, the demerits of increasing fuel prices for controlling global warming did not surface.. In fact, in my controversy essay, the purpose of the information was to draw the attention of the audience to the different arguments relating to increasing fuel prices for controlling global warming.

In this context, I did not take sides with any argument. However, to remain effective to my second audience, I had to change the purpose of the writing. In this context, my purpose was to convince the audience to support my claim. This is quite clear where I ignored the demerits of increasing fuel prices as seen in the controversy essay and concentrated on only the merits of the reference topic in the public argument essay. In addition, in my writing process, I had to change my rhetorical strategies.

In my first assignment, I was quite general in writing. However, in the second assignment I introduced the open letter strategy. This strategy was significant in drawing attention, personalizing the information, and establishing conviction to my claim. More so, it helped me to address the new audience with more certainty. At the same time, I used diction to address the different audiences and defining the purposes of the two essays. Notably, in the controversy essay, I chose a neutral diction and used a more academic language in informing my audience on the arguments surrounding the increasing of fuel prices for the purposes of controlling global warming.

This was quite relevant in removing bias and deriving logic in my writing. However, in addressing the public, I had to change the diction to suit the purpose and audience of my writing. I adopted a less academic language and used examples that are more practical. For example, that of reducing traffic jams by increasing fuel prices. This aims