Name Professor Class Date Should the companies proclaim policy for protect the worker's family? And what's the effect? Business entities are also part of society and being such, it has an obligation to proclaim and enforce policies that protect the worker and the worker’s family…
Failing to protect the worker and the worker’s family could be very disadvantageous to the company in terms of image and brand because the general public will be appalled with a company’s labor practice that disregard the welfare and protection of its employees and its immediate dependents. When the general public will perceive the company as uncaring, they will be turned off with the company and will cease patronizing its products. When customers no longer patronize or buy a company’s product or service, its sales will decline and it follows that when sales decline, the profitability of the company will also decline and it will not be long before the company will go bankrupt. In addition to customers who would be put off with a company that does not proclaim the protection of its employee and their families, investors and the general public will begin to have a negative perception of its shares of stock and it will follow that its stock price will decline due to the negative perception of the market. When that happens, returns to the shareholders will also decline. When the returns of the shareholders investment will decline, they will withdraw their money from the company and will look for other companies to invest it in where it could be more profitable. Thus, the evil cycle will begin with shareholders leaving the company aggravating the already negative perception on the company. In the end, the company may even go bankrupt just because of the market’s negative perception of the company with its uncaring labor practice with its employees and their families. The refusal or failure of the company to protect the worker and their families come in many ways. For the worker’s family’s refusal or inability to protect them by the company, this could come in the form of non recognition of health insurance coverage and in today’s case refusal to implement Obamacare. In effect, this law mandates that companies are all required to protect all their workers and their families from rising medical cost despite their medical condition. Failure to cover its employees would tantamount to paying fines which the law will impose on the company. This is important to mention because this is the new context that businesses will be operating in terms of providing health insurance to their employees and their employees. It meant that companies will have to cover all of its employees including those who were previously uninsurable and those who have pre-exisitng conditions and that includes their families. This may mean an added cost in terms of paying premiums as employees who were not uninsurable has to be insured now that companies may be tempted to renege it to save on cost. The consequence proved to be more expensive because companies who refused to provide medical insurance protection to their employees and their families were fined heavily such as the case of big companies such as AT&T and Caterpillar who decided to stop providing health coverage for their employers because of its additional cost. As a result, it was slapped with penalty and mandated to pay heavy fines that were very costly (Colvin 125). Big companies are considering this option because the forced coverage of the new law on health insurance on all of its employees including those who were previously uninsurable would mean huge addition of cost due to the scale of its employees. Such, they deemed it more ...
Cite this document
(“Should the companies proclaim policy for protect the worker's family Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/88619-should-the-companies-proclaim-policy-for-protect
(Should the Companies Proclaim Policy for Protect the Worker'S Family Essay)
“Should the Companies Proclaim Policy for Protect the Worker'S Family Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/88619-should-the-companies-proclaim-policy-for-protect.
Sandy is at a very important post in her school as her job has a huge role to play in developing a caring community. Sandy chose this particular profession because she feels strongly about the development of a healthy environment around her. She wants her community people to be closely bonded, safe and caring.
Play as well as movie writers also utilise this style in their literary work in order to make it more appealing to the targeted audiences. As such, this paper has been designed to explore the cause and effect of the use of metaphors in movies in some manner.
Throughout human history, several groups of people have experienced harsh, unjust, and inhumane treatment due to their dissimilarities from the mainstream society. The dissimilarity has been largely based on race and hence it is correct to describe violence which is committed based on ethnicity as racial violence (Browne-Marshall 15).
In general, service as a business offering, perhaps, embarrasses when thought of as an act of enslavement to the customer. The notion of service is, as a result, revised or specialized in ways that avoid that harsh association with inferior status.
Pfeffer and Salancik (1978) described the relationship between an organization and its environment as a quasi-marketplace, in which representatives of the focal organization are continually negotiating and allocating organizational control with members of critical publics on whom the focal organization depends for its survival and success.
In the post-war America when television was first introduced in the market, only local channels were broadcast and it had not penetrated into the depths of the society. But as time passed and technology developed, it has now become a part of every home even in remote corners of the world. Today most people are patterned by the programs on TV.
Whether to pay dividends or not and if yes by how much is determined by the dividend policy of the firm.
Dividend Policy of a firm depends on several factors like Firms Financial needs, its future growth plans and earnings and investment opportunities, investors need for income or dividends, firms fund raising capacity and control of authority as well as government decision on incomes from dividends and capital gains.
Family policy's primary aim is to give for the 'well-being' of the family. The collision of family policy is diverse. It manipulates the structure and the functions of the family: Dumon (1987) illustrates family policy as a mechanism used by the government to retain, support or change equally the structure of families and family life.
Its effects, ranging from physiological to psychosocial, on the problem drinker as well as the entire family are devastating.
Children of alcoholics are exposed to both physical and psychosocial challenges. For instance, an alcoholic pregnant woman places the fetus that she carries in great risk as it is known that alcohol affects the fetus in utero.
The family is implicit to be observed in all West European country logically leads to questions concerning, first, what makes up society's social and political order and, secondly, how the family fits into this system. Separate phases have exemplified the expansion of family policy political, economic and a social framework.