Animals are Friends, not Scientific Experiments For decades, animals have been used by scientists in their research. Mostly, these animals have been instrumental in medical research and testing. Animal experimentation has helped scientists in finding solutions to various emerging and currently existing diseases…
This paper seeks to quickly review animals as friends of man, and not scientific experiments. Animal research is a practice that has had an inhumane impact on animals. It is a cruel process which often involves discomfort to the animals, and in some instances, pain and death. Pain is a mental process which often cannot be observed, but it does not mean that it is not happening. Its physical impact can also be significant as observed from humans who manifest responses like screaming, crying, or even jerking away from the object or person causing them pain. If from the above-mentioned indicators we can deduce pain in humans, why is it that the scientists overlook the fact that animals also feel pain? When animals are stepped on or poked, they cry or jerk away. Animal testing involves hurting and painful procedures which include the injection of poisonous chemicals, the cutting of their abdomen, and the stressing of their bones until they break, and similar other procedures. All these painful acts are performed without anesthesia being administered. Scientists argue that anesthesia often interferes with the accuracy of their results. For which reason, they have no qualms about subjecting these animals to intolerable pain. Painful experiments on animals can make most people uncomfortable. For many years, much controversy has surrounded the practice of animal testing, and the subject of primates subjected to testing has been one of the core issues of this controversy (Conn, et.al., 2008). On one side, humans relate more to primates, more than any other animals and therefore, their eagerness on the use of such primates for experimentation is strong (Conn, et.al., 2008). The feelings of kinship with primates have often animal rights groups to express their protests against animal cruelty and testing. Those involved in primate testing however argue that these experiments are necessary in order to establish cures for diseases and the fact that primates have more in common anatomically to humans, make them the best candidate for experimentation (Guerrini, 2003). There are however inherent issues which are bound with this practice. It is evident that animals experience cruel and inhuman treatments through some of the experiments carried out on them. In some of these experiments, they are often forced to ingest household products and are then monitored to observe the results. Further, in other experiments, animals are often forced to ingest medicines before these medications are put into market. These experiments are carried out in order to ensure that they do not have any life-threatening side effects on human beings. To test corrosive chemicals, chemicals are often applied on the shaved backs of the animals and these chemicals expectedly burn the skins of these animals, often causing them much agony and pain (Larry, 2004 p145). According to the scientists, animals and human beings have a similar biological structure. This is a fragile foundation to base an argument on. Research has expressed that every animal species has a unique biological structure which may look similar to others, but are, in fact, very different. It has also been established that experimental results accrued from one species can have negative results on other species (Langley 2010). It is therefore wrong to conclude that the biological genetics of human beings resemble those of animals; and it is therefore wro ...
Cite this document
(“Animals are Friends, not Scientific Experiments Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/9916-animals-are-friends-not-scientific-experiments
(Animals Are Friends, Not Scientific Experiments Research Paper)
“Animals Are Friends, Not Scientific Experiments Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/9916-animals-are-friends-not-scientific-experiments.
Distributed in 76 countries internationally, it is the world’s largest grassroots environmental federation . It aims to achieve its goal by influencing government to include accountability and prevent any harm created to the earth’s natural environment in their policy-making, legislature and distribution of funds.
The Army had a saying before “you can talk to a horse, but you can also chat and whisper to a mule and to other animals” (Buttons, n.p.). In line with this, there are several theories explaining that man become associated with animals because animals think, feel joy and sadness, feel bored, desire, and even sexual feelings.
It talks of the pain and suffering that animals have to undergo as they are subjected to procedures that are cruel and prevent the animals from leading normal lives. These experiments are most often conducted for the development of drugs and cosmetics for the benefit of human beings.
Vivisection is another term for animal experimentation and it literally means the cutting up of animals. During the 1980s, the animal research has declined due to public pressure and restraint in finances. However, the fast-paced technology during the mid-twentieth century had greatly increased the number of animals used in research and experiments for the advancement of science and medicine (Animal Welfare Online).
In the textbooks of various disciplines of science, the history of science was described mainly as a linear development with gradual accumulation of knowledge about the universe. The current state of affairs in science is presented as a culmination of this development.
By the time he began his experiment in 1961, Adolf Eichmann, an infamous Nazi war criminal was on trial for sanctioning and participating in the murder and torture of many Jews during the Holocaust. Milgram was perplexed by the
These leaders had the power to facilitate the policies that Angelo deemed profitable for the firm. A key example of a leader that undermined the ethical expectations of his position was a California state appeals court judge called Richard Aldrich