The French and the Anglo-Saxons - Research Paper Example

English as a Creole Introduction Variable theories have been developed to formulate the origin of the modern English language. These have all been presented to offer justification of the process that had been involved in the creation of the witnessed process. Majorities of the formulated processes have included the origin that the language had advanced from a different ethnicity to witness adoption and inclusion into the modern system of speech. The language has undergone modification to witness the advancement from Old English to the Middle English system. The developments in the English language that witnessed the advancement of the period had been found in the Middle English realized in the four centuries between 11th and 16th century. The argument in the advancement of the English language had been placed that the entity developed from the manipulation of pidgin. The argument had been placed that the language had witnessed manipulation and inclusion of creolisation to realize the changes in the language. The progression had been witnessed in the language as it transformed from the Old English to Middle English. These terms had been applied to suggest the advancements that had existed in the language and the definitions accorded, as various events brought transformation witnessed and inclusion of Creole effect on English. The result saw the inclusion of variable verbs and sentence structure that had resembled the influence from a foreign entity that had prompted the suggestion of Creole. To articulate the steps that had been involved in the transformation, there needs to be an analysis of the changes that were realized in the Old English system as it advanced to Middle English. The argument is placed to link Creole to English and the connection shared in the history of the English language. History of English Language The origin of the language had been realized from West Germany that had been incorporated within the British society through invasion. Old English had been initially developed to reflect the Anglo-Saxon Kingdom backgrounds as realized in England. Of the available dialects that had formulated the composition of Old English had been the Late West Saxon, which had been the most dominant among the available groups. The changes that had been introduced in the English language had been more prominent during the Middle Ages. The resemblance of Old English of the AD 1000 period had resembled the ancient Germanic languages. Furthermore, the language had been noted to fail to meet the intelligent expectation of the speakers as compared to the Middle English established during AD 1400. The transformation within the language had been advanced in varied measures that had been developed in colonization by both Scandinavian group and Normans. The presentation would lead to the inclusion of the effects of the Anglo-Norman within the spoken English vocabulary as presented in the modern society. The Scandinavians, on the other hand, contributed to the witnessed simplicity of the vocabulary in the language that had been profoundly influenced by the Anglo-Norman origin. These changes had been on a limited platform and failed to spread to South West England that saw advancement of Old English into a recognized literal language. The Normans had invaded in 1066, a development that saw the enhancement of the literal English from the influence in London. The leading societal institutions adopted the trend to include the technical aspect in the language that had been influenced tremendously by the Old Norman system. The Renaissance adopted the provision to develop the language based on the desire to incorporate aspects within the development as had been with the other leading languages. The development saw advancement of the English vocabulary that had relied on other languages to achieve the noticed developments. This had been witnessed in the inclusion of Norman and French to present the platform and source to derive foreign vocabulary. Proto-English The group recognized as the Germanic people who participated in the colonization and expansion process led to the development of the English language. The interaction process and inclusion of practices within the meetings gave rise to a communication platform that had been termed the source of English language. Old English After the witnessed invasion under the influence of the Anglo-Saxons, the language that had been more dominant had been Germanic, which influenced the colonized territories that had developed into the modern England. Scotland, Wales and the Cornish Capital retained the recognized Celtic languages that had late offered the evidence of integration of the languages. Furthermore, Latin had been retained among the few highly placed individuals as a communication venture among the individuals. The language was later reintroduced into England to offer influences on the English language. Old English had been developed from the interaction of the available tribes to accord a distinct language leading to the invention of a varied civilization (Lenker 156). Old English would witness the inclusion and origin of the modern language despite presenting unintelligent formats. English had been derived from the Germanic language and witnessed the development of words like Water and Strong included in modern style. The Old English style saw dominance until the 13th century when developments had been made to transform the language into a different format. The Germanic influence within the Old English speakers had been obtained from the interaction with the Norse colonizers, and the provision led to the introduction of simplistic elements that had been included within the language to be adopted within the regions. With Christianity developed in the later stages of the sixth century, more Latin words had been added into the language favoring few Greek terminologies. The Norman influence led to the decline in the language when the provision noticed the conquest of the French speaking dialect group. Middle English After the Norman dominance, majority of the higher officials spoke the French language known as Anglo-Norman that had been witnessed to originate from the northern dialect (Lenker 156). Both the Anglo-Norman and Anglo-French languages had influenced the developed language after Old English. The persistent of the French influence had been the provision witnessed to lead to the majority of the contribution to the developed language, long after the fall of Norman-French. The French influence had been marked to contribute to the introduction of variable vocabulary within the English language as recognized in the modern century. The pronunciation bore similarities in the languages and the incorporation of the similar style presented the platform for development of vocabulary. Norman style had significant contribution towards the Old English that had been eventually transformed into the Middle English style (Nadler 11). The style of development in vocabulary had been reintroduced after the decline of Anglo-Norman to favor advancement in the developed language. Provision of Oxford had been the first document produced to reflect the English language after the demise of Norman reign in 1258. After the event, a first public address had been made in English in 1362, presenting Edward III’s intention to the citizens. The century ended on a high to promote the language in the adoption of the trend by the royal family. The period with numerous contributions to the language changed and developed English. The grammar and vocabulary applied in the language changed the process to witness the inclusion of the endings to the –e. Plural setting of the included words that had been in the form of –en had been altered to accommodate –s, discarding the element of grammatical gender (Ryan). The number of French words in Middle English elevated as the Norman effect continued to dominate the developed style. Spelling and pronunciation had also been altered to accord a style that developed the language as noticed in the present vocabulary. Middle English Link to Creole Majority of the argument has been placed to relate Middle English to Creole with the distinction accorded in the history of the language. The Celts had been the natives of the British Isles who dominated the area from Ireland to Gaul. In the later years, some areas of Southern England had been colonized by Julius Caesar to acknowledge the development of Britannia. The Romans dominated England for the preceding centuries and exert dominance before their fall and occupation of Saxons within the land. The Saxons incorporated the element of the Runic alphabet in the land and integrated with the German populations to formulate Anglo-Saxons. After the invasion, the developments saw integration where French soldiers had been influenced to dominate the Saxon wives. The barrier presented had been in the language that the two groups had not spoken on a similar platform (Nadler 12). The women were not allowed to speak French, and the Soldiers had been barred from learning English as they formulated a new language in pidgin. This condition had been the solution presented to offer communication between the couple who needed a link to relate. The evidence suggested the influence of class and nobility in the development of a language. Names had been shared and presented the challenges in explanations accorded of variable entities within the social setting. The Norman French invented the naming presented the variation and recognition of foods while some animal identities had been from the Anglo-Saxon recognition. The commonly known pork had been from a French language while the animal pig originated from the Anglo-Saxon. The reflection in the nobility differences, in the language completion, saw the rich and higher class speak Norman-French as compared to the other common individuals who adopted Anglo-Saxon. The interaction between the two groups realized the adoption of a new trend that had noticed a regime ruled by the French who did not speak English. The writers and creators had been targeting an increased audience who failed to understand the language applied. Some writers saw the inclusion of separate dialects to satisfy the needs of the users. This saw the inclusion of a communication measure that had incorporated both French and Anglo-Saxon languages to generate the understanding that had been required. The sound developed had been related to the inclusion of the integration of both languages within the dialects to generate an added provision to the development of the English vocabulary. The famous writers of the time had been Chaucer and Caxton who developed the grammar that had been related to the current spelling (Garret 12). Their developments saw application of the peculiar writing style in the works of renowned personalities in the Shakespearean writings. The developments had been included in the providence that contributed to the influence that created the avenues to the noticed Early Modern English. However, the developments in the period had held minimal evidence that English had been developed from Creole and suggested the adoption of the language from the evolution of the vocabulary applied. The shift in the period had been evolved from the need to articulate a communication measure for the developing groups. These had held the significant development to ascertain the need of presenting a uniform platform that would increase understanding (Ryan). The developers of the language sought the solution for the language developed from their motive to market their ideology to both classes and focus on the challenges within their society. The difference in Anglo-Saxon ad Middle English had been varied and accorded the variation that differentiated the two entities. The leading differences in the languages had been in vocabulary, grammar applied and the pronunciation of the available terms. The mostly evident variation had been included in the variation that had existed in the dialect as the Middle English era offered different provisions. However, the development of Middle English from the Old English realized not only vocabulary differences, but also in the pronunciation. Anglo-Saxon, on the other hand, had developed from Old Saxon to retain the sounds that the former language had utilized. The Old English had undergone the shift into the different dialect that reflected the High German Consonant alteration. The other difference saw Saxon vocabulary apply the Runic alphabet that had been utilized before the inclusion of the Latin writing style. The most outstanding writing during the era that explained the development in the language had been reflected in the creation of Beowulf that explained the advancement in Anglo-Saxon style (Ryan). Latin influence had been more dominant in the era and saw the provision to create avenues that would change image needed to advance the English language. The spellings in the Latin language that influenced the former English had been varied from the developments in the modern English, but held a resemblance with the style that had influenced the development in Old High German, Saxon and the Norse style. Anglo-Saxon had been developed to be based on varied principles and rules similar to the modern Icelandic. The words had been varied from the Old English to be presented into the Middle English style. The integration of the Anglo-Saxon and Old French developed a language that witnessed the loss of vowels, alteration of nouns and adjectives. For the two groups to establish a communication platform there had to be the formulation of an understanding that developed pidgin. The development of the pidgin offered the needed evidence that Middle English had been advanced from Creole. The Creole aspect had been advanced from the developed new language indicated to be related in the establishment of pidgin. This presentation had been the established relationship that accorded the form needed to complete the interaction with the failure of the Anglo-Saxon and French to establish a relationship. With the silence presented within the English language during the era, there had been minimal evidence of the evidence in the pidgin style. The evidence of the existence of the pidgin language had been in the interaction witnessed between Anglo-Saxon and French (Garret 9). Within the marriage settings, there needed to be a language for interaction and exchange of the ideologies. Therefore, the natives developed pidgin to offer the needed ventures to satisfy the provision of the new language. Pidgin had been the language applied by the majority of the illiterate, and the Anglo-Saxon advanced their own vocabulary on interaction. The literate class within the society had been the individuals who could speak Latin and French with the pidgin developers failing to offer a record of their language. The society presented few individuals who had been educated and could record the Anglo-Saxon language. The relationship of Middle English and Creole had been included in the definition of the later. The terms Creole and Pidgin had been developed from the preceding century linguistics that developed the terms from advancements in the changed languages. The leading evidences have suggested that Creole had been developed from a group of languages that had been developed from native speakers. The recorded contribution had been witnessed in the evidence offered by linguistics that had been able to identify with the group. With the identification of their language, the developments in the progressed vocabulary contributed to enhancing the style to offer easier understanding among the established societies. With advancement in the linguistic ideology, the recognition had been issued in distinguishing the image of the developed Creole language, in which the natives of the Middle English era could not identify. The evidence offered that Creole had been a singular language apart from the Middle English development without a relation. Creole had been defined as the progress obtained from the advancement of the Pidgin English passed from a generation to the other (McArthur 160). The language would then be advanced to become the first language applied to increase the interaction measures to promote the understanding between the speakers. The adoption of Pidgin within the language had been noticed as some communities learned the language to be involved with the speakers of the language. With the aspect defined and incorporated within the system, the term developed the concept of creolization that saw adoption of the style into the system. Children born from the community that adopted the language grew up with the language amongst their vocabulary and became their mother tongue. Creolization had been the result of a primitive language advanced to be accommodated within the civilization in society to become recognized as an advanced language (McArthur 160). The language had been matured to become a leading provision and communication channel in the community to gain recognition as a new language, hence Middle English as a Creole language. Conclusion With the challenge developed between the French and the Anglo-Saxon, there had been the need to invent the communication channel, which would offer a solution to the barriers developed. The English language had advanced from the interaction of the colonizing communities and the natives to dominate the civilization that had been presented. The French and the Anglo-Saxon developed the pidgin language that had advanced to occupy the definition of Creole. With the passage of the language from a generation to the next, the incorporation into the culture had been evident. Modern English was related to Creole because the people in the Middle English civilization failed to accord their style the needed identity. Works Cited Garret, Paul. Is Middle English a Creole? January 2009. Web. 30 May 2012. Available at: Lenker, Ursula. Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010. Print. McArthur, Tom. The English Languages. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998. Print. Nadler, Aleandra. Creoles, Pidgins and the Middle English Creolization Hypothesis. Santa Cruz: GRIN Verlag, 2007. Print. Ryan, Brandy. Middle English as Creole: “Still trying not to refer to you lot as ‘bloody colonials’” utoronto. 200s. Web. 30 May 2012. Available at: Read More