StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Since the Confederation of the Canadian nation in 1867, a fierce debate has been raging whether Canada should dissolve its constitutional ties to the monarchy or whether it should continue to retain them…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy"

of the of the Concerned 14 May Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy Since the Confederation of the Canadian nation in 1867, a fierce debate has been raging whether Canada should dissolve its constitutional ties to the monarchy or whether it should continue to retain them. Any stance on this issue needs to be well informed, democratic, in consonance with the aspirations and spirit of the Canadian people, culture and traditions and inevitably must portend propitious tidings for Canada as a country and a responsible member of the International community.

Time has come to question the cultural and political role of the Monarchy in the Canadian way of governance and in the Canadian social and cultural life. People need to think that does Monarchy has a pragmatic and viable role in the decision making and policy charting in Canada or is it merely limited to being a face on the Canadian currency? A thorough analysis of the wish of the Canadian masses, an in depth understanding of the Canadian culture and ethos and a strong affiliation to the local and international interests of the Canadian nation, do lead to a firm conclusion that Canada should dissolve is ties to the Crown at the earliest.

Now is the time for the Canadian people to do away with their anachronistic colonial past by establishing themselves as a sovereign republic. The very fact that a Queen located in some distant land and catering to the wishes and aspirations of the people of her land should try to or should be allowed to have a jurisdiction over the political life, law and order institutions and courts of a nation of freedom loving people like the Canadians sounds absurd and irrational. Monarchy is a feudal way of governance, and luckily neither the UK nor Canada claim to be feudalistic societies in a contemporary context (Wilson: Online).

The very idea that a man or a woman who has been granted divine rights by some God in the sky automatically commands a share in the taxpayers’ money is ridiculous. In the year 2007, the Canadian people spent or rather say splurged $ 55 million to support the way of life and the activities of the Queen’s representative in Canada that is the Governor General (Wilson: Online). It seems really atrocious to realize that a person commanding unwarranted authority on the behalf of a foreign queen should have the theoretical powers to depose Canada’s government or dissolve Canada’s democratically elected parliament (Wilson: Online).

Even stranger is the power of the Privy Council to pass laws that are not subject to Parliamentary review (Wilson: Online). Even the humblest and gently endowed of the Canadian citizens or even say a denizen of some other free and democratic country will take no time to understand that such draconian and feudalistic powers are a sophisticated way of continuing the vestiges of a bygone way of governance that has become redundant and vestigial in a modern world. It’s time for the monarchy to go.

Even if say the monarchy has historical ties with Canada and thus should be allowed to have constitutional ties with this nation, the primary premise is that Canada like Britain is a democratic nation and hence if such a relationship with the British monarchy is to exist, it should be in consonance with the wishes and aspirations of the Canadian people. Yet, the facts point to the contrary. A poll conducted by Ipsos Reid in October 2009 showed without an iota of doubt that roughly 53 percent of the Canadians wanted Canada to dissolve it constitutional ties with the monarchy and almost 49 percent wanted Canada to be a Republic (Wilson: Online).

Moreover, 60 percent of the Canadians considered the royal family to be mere celebrities, of no relevance to the Canadian culture and way of life (Wilson: Online). The point is that the Canadians do not need a queen. Some say that Canada is a new country with no past and traditions and hence it should be allowed to have ties to the monarchy (Tidridge 11) . Yes Canada is a young nation, but no, it does not mean that it should as a compensation stick to the outdated systems of Europe. The good thing is that being a relatively new nation, Canada can learn from the histories and mistakes of other nations and can build new traditions and practices that are more current, pragmatic and based on democratic ideals.

Is Canada averse to making a Canadian the constitutional head of the country? Certainly it is not so. At least the public opinion, Canadian ethos and national interest do indicate to the contrary. So Canada should dissolve its constitutional ties to the monarchy. Works Cited Tidridge, Nathan. Canada’s Constitutional Monarchy. London: Dundurn, 2011. Wilson, Terry. “Why we Need a Republic of Canada”. Canadian Awareness Network. 17 April 2011. 14 May 2011 .

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421740-1-canada-should-abolish-the-senate-as-the-ychupper-houseyie-of-parliament-or-2-canada-should-end-its-constitutional-ties-to-th
(Canada Should End Its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy Essay)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421740-1-canada-should-abolish-the-senate-as-the-ychupper-houseyie-of-parliament-or-2-canada-should-end-its-constitutional-ties-to-th.
“Canada Should End Its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1421740-1-canada-should-abolish-the-senate-as-the-ychupper-houseyie-of-parliament-or-2-canada-should-end-its-constitutional-ties-to-th.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Canada should End its Constitutional Ties to the Monarchy

The United States Form of Government and that of Britain

Notably, the founding fathers who wrote the US constitution had the British political system to draw on; however, they avoided any form of concentrated power that resembled the monarchy because it is one of the chief things that they rebelled against.... hellip; The US has a constitutional republic and federal form of government while the UK employs the constitutional monarch-parliament form of governance.... On the other hand, the UK has its monarch acting as the head of state; however, supreme authority is not vested unto the monarch because there is a separate head of the government elected by the people who exercise political powers....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Written Constitution of the UK

Written Constitution of UK Name: Course: Date Written constitution is referred to a formal document which posits the constitutional setting, governing rules over political system and rights and duties of citizens in a codified form (Hamilton, 2005).... Magna Carta may perhaps be a first signed document of constitutional nature.... Absence of constitution does not mean that United Kingdom does not have any constitution; rather it means the absence of a complied document that could conjoin the contemporary practices of constitutional nature such as from Magna Carta, Bill of rights and parliamentary acts plus the unwritten conventions which are followed broadly....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Constitutional Monarchy in the UK

the monarchy of United Kingdom (UK) also known as British Monarchy is the statutory monarchy of the UK and its foreign terrains.... As the monarchy is constitutional, the monarch is constitutional and the power of the Queen is restricted to impartial functions such as bestowing honours to individuals and appointing the prime minister of the states under the monarchy.... Constitutional monarchy is considered to be a form of administration in which a King or a Queen acts as the head of the state, country or a group of nation....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Written and Unwritten Constitution

(Smith, 2001, 80) The distinction between written and unwritten constitutions was pointed out for the first time by Bryce, and has now become a fundamental concept of constitutional law and practice.... 1 It, therefore, occupies a privileged position and possesses a greater guarantee of permanence: a situation which French jurists have described as constitutional super-legality.... A State is deemed to have a written constitution when the basic principles and institutions of its political organization are to be found in a document or a series of documents....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Main Problems with the Royal Prerogative

As per the Royal Prerogative vested on the monarchy, the Queen has the right to appoint and dismiss a prime minister.... Wikipedia describes the Royal Prerogative “as a body of customary authority, privilege, and immunity, recognized in common law jurisdictions possessing a monarchy as belonging to the Crown alone.... As part of the common law, the Queen represents the British constitutional monarchy that is apolitical, symbolic and impartial....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Written and Unwritten Constitution

(Smith, 2001, 80) The distinction between written and unwritten constitutions was pointed out for the first time by Bryce, and has now become a fundamental concept of constitutional law and practice.... A State is deemed to have a written constitution when the basic principles and institutions of its political organization are to be found in a document or a series of documents.... The idea of permanency is closely associated with the concept of constitution so much so that stability is considered to be one of its main attributes....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Difference of Political System Between Canada and China

The article “The Difference of the Political System between canada and China” analyzes in detail and compares in various aspects the political structure of countries as diverse as canada and China.... hellip; However, from the institutional perspective, where documents are analyzed to discern the collective behavior of political institutions, canada has a new and distinct political culture formed by the combination of the cultures of the two major founding groups as well as the cultures of immigrants....
9 Pages (2250 words) Article

Political Issues

otably, the founding fathers who wrote the US constitution had the British political system to draw on; however, they avoided any form of concentrated power that resembled the monarchy because it is one of the chief things that they rebelled against.... The main purpose of the paper "Political Issues" is on contrasting the difference between government systems of the US and the UK, as well as other countries referring to three articles and the difference between presidential and parliamentary systems of government....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us