Actus Reus and Mens Rea
8 pages (2000 words) , Research Paper
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus and Mens Rea Research Paper Introduction Majority of crimes demand whatlawyers call ‘mens rea’ in Latin, or ‘guilty mind’. Basically, what an offender was thinking and what the offender planned when the offense was perpetrated is important. The main purpose of ‘mens rea’ is to help the criminal justice system distinguish between an individual who did not intend to perpetrate a crime and an individual who deliberately planned to perpetrate a crime (Emanuel, 2007). Motive is a circumstantial way to verify that an act was carried out purposefully or deliberately. A suspect in an assault case, for instance, may say that he hit the victim...
Criminal Law Question: "To talk of actus reus as guilty conduct is to misunderstand English Criminal Law". Discuss (2000 words word limit
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus as guilty conduct is to misunderstand English Criminal Law". Discuss In order to understand the role of‘actus reus’ in English Criminal Law we should primarily refer to all aspects of the above term as they have been developed by theorists but also – mainly – by the judges in relevant conflicts. At a first level it could be noticed that ‘actus reus’ has been introduced in English law in order to describe specific terms under which a person should be considered as guilty of an action that is punished by particular provisions of English Criminal Law. The explanation of the content of the above term is of significant importance mostly because it can lead... Criminal Law Question: "To talk of...
A crime in English Law and Canadian Law
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea. It is important to note that concurrence of these two elements is mandatory to prove any offence. While existence of these two elements is common in English and Canadian laws, there are some major differences when it comes to their interpretation in these two laws... ?Running Head: A crime in english and canadian law A Crime in English and Canadian Law Teacher’s ID English and Canadian laws have some major similarities in general since Canadian law has drawn its genesis from the English version of criminal law like many other countries of the world. Criminal law has some major components that are required to exist in order to prove a commission of a crime. These two elements are...
Criminal law
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, mens rea and the absence of any defence. (Lord Diplock in R v Miller)2 The actus reus... Criminal Law The issue in this question relates to possible liability of Dot and Earl in respect of the Criminal Damage Act 1971. The liabilities of both the individuals would be discussed separately along with any defences that are applicable. The starting point for criminal law is Article 6(2) ECHR which states that “Everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law. The burden of proof is on prosecution who has to prove it beyond all reasonable doubt, or satisfy the jury of the guilt of the defendant. (Woolmington v. DPP)1 The main elements required to prove an offence are ac...
Criminal law problem question
6 pages (1500 words) , Download 1 , Case Study
...ACTUS REUS Actus reus, put simply, means 'a guilty act'. This must be present for an offence to have been committed. In the case of murder actus reus must be an act that results in death. In the case of manslaughter, this can be performed in a commission or an omission resulting in death. The most common definition of the actus reus in murder is provided by Edward Coke, who states - "When a man of sound memory and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the King's Peace, . . . so as the party wounded, or hurt, et cetera, die of the wound or hurt, et cetera, within a year and a day after... CRIMINAL LAW PROBLEM QUESTION -...
Criminal Law - Theft
6 pages (1500 words) , Case Study
Only on StudentShare
...ACTUS REUS while the state of mind of the defendant at the time of committing the criminal offence is referred to as the MENS REA. THE ACTUS REUS The actus reus does not just mean the act. It takes into account the circumstances and consequences aimed at establishing the liability of the defendant... INTRODUCTION The imposition of liability on a defendant charged for the commission of a criminal offence is generally based on the fact that at the time of committing the guilty act, the defendant possessed a guilty state of mind. There has to be a trail of malice afore thought. This is referred to as CONTEMPORANEITY RULE. Substantially, the act of committing a criminal offence is referred to as the ACTUS...
Criminology
5 pages (1250 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus while the corresponding mental state is called mens rea. It is the prosecutions duty to prove those... Criminal Liability Theory and Principles Introduction A crime is an act or omission forbidden by law or the penal code as a violation of the general public interest. The victim of a crime is the community. Prosecution is done by government attorneys representing the community. Unlike civil wrong where a person convicted of wrong doing can pay damages or compensate for the wrong, a person who is convicted of a crime is punished (Fletcher 31). Felonies are punishable by more than one year of imprisonment. They include homicide, rape, robbery, arson and others. Misdemeanors are less serious tha...
Criminal Law: principles
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus' and 'mens rea' as well as looking into the subjective and objective test given. The primary principle relating to criminal responsibility is actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea meaning an act cannot make someone legally blameworthy in the absence of a guilty... Imagine that you have been asked to write a lecture. Your audience will be people of average intelligence, but with no specialist knowledge of the law or legal system. Your objectives are to ensure that your audience understands:- The key requirements for criminal responsibility This paper looks at the fundamental concepts and principles of the system of criminal law. It give readers a better understanding on the concept of 'actu...
Introduction to Criminal Law and Legal studies (CRIMINOLOGY)
7 pages (1750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...ACTUS Reus” typically refers to the behavior comprising an offense, in addition to any necessary situations or consequences of the behavior. In addition, the conduct constituting the offence must comprise a deliberate act. In case a consequence is an offense constituent, evidence of the ACTUS Reus necessitates evidence... and ID ...................................................................................................................................................... Lecturer..........................................................................................................................................
Four Criminal Law Questions
1 pages (250 words) , Research Paper
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus and Mens Rea. Both mens rea and actus reus are both required for any criminal act, in general. Without bothm there can be no conviction, or crime. “Mens rea” is defined as “guilty thought,” or intent. The criminal must have the “intent” to commit the crime, to meet the specific elements of any crime. With no intent to commit a crime, there is usually no crime (there are many exceptions). The intent can be specific intent or non-specific, such as negligence, or recklessness, where a duty is owed to others, but not followed, or disregarded. “Actus reus” is defines as “guilty act.” The criminal... Unit 2 Questions. Assignment #624408 Please explain the importance of the general principles of...
Penal Law
2 pages (500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea" is depicted as. Since it's clear, Ian was the one involved in the actual physical act or termed the "actus reus", he should of course have to answer for his actions, as previously stated. This is especially true when considering the fact that Fred's' injury, lead to medical attention, which because of this treatment, lead to his untimely death (Wikipedia Encyclopedia 2005). As research goes further in this specific case, to determine Ians' state of mind and intent it will continue to utilize... You're 04 November 2005 Criminal Law Before this research can actually approach the incident that occurred between the twoadolescent's, (Ian and Fred) there first must be an...
The Main Aspects of Criminal Law
6 pages (1500 words) , Case Study
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, mens rea, along with defenses need to be considered upon. The main ingredients of an offence require a prohibited act or state (for example injuring someone) brought about with a prohibited state of mind ( i.e purely accidental conduct will not suffice) and there are no valid defences present. The prohibited act is known as the actus reus while the mens rea and defences are included in prohibited state of mind (Fletcher, 2000). The mens rea which will suffice is the intention or subjective recklessness. Intention can be categorized into direct... "Criminal Law" The fact based issues require an in depth assessment of matters related to criminal law. The main aspects of criminal law, i.e...
Essential Elements of a Crime
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus of a crime For a prosecutor to successful prosecute an offender he/she must prove beyond any reasonable doubt that a criminal cat was committed with a guilty state of mind. The physical act of crime is what is referred to as the actus reus of a crime and it does not only consist of the physical action but also circumstances and consequences that prevailed to amount to a particular offence (Clarkson, 2005:16). In other words, the actus reus of a crime is tantamount to all essential elements of a crime apart from the state of mind of the offender. This means that the actus reus under criminal law will include but not limited conduct, a state of affair, causation... or an omission...
Essential Elements of a Crime
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus of a crime For a prosecutor to successful prosecute an offender he/she mustprove beyond any reasonable doubt that a criminal cat was committed with a guilty state of mind. The physical act of crime is what is referred to as the actus reus of a crime and it does not only consist of the physical action but also circumstances and consequences that prevailed to amount to a particular offence (Clarkson, 2005:16). In other words, the actus reus of a crime is tantamount to all essential elements of a crime apart from the state of mind of the offender. This means that the actus reus under criminal law will include but not limited conduct, a state of affair, causation... or an omission...
The Principle of Correspondence in Criminal Law
11 pages (2750 words) , Download 1 , Essay
...actus reus) and must have acquired the mental state (mens rea) that propelled him to perform an illegal act. Actus reus is derived from Latin and means “guilty act” whereas mens rea means “guilty mind”. Under actus reus, the guilty act referred to could either be the commission or omission of an act that then leads to the violation of existing laws. Consider a case where a person, willingly and knowingly, drives over the speed limit. Here, the act of over speeding is done with total disregard to the existing law. An example of an omission of an act is a case where after adopting a pet, a person fails to care for and feed it thus leading to its demise... The Principle of Correspondence in Criminal Law...
Criminal law
6 pages (1500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea, although some crimes are crimes... What constitutes a crime varies across people, places and time. You are required to examine different definitions of crime and comment on the function of the criminal law in addressing crime levels in the UK.  One definition of crime defines it as “an act or omission that leads to penal sanction in accordance with the constitutionally valid procedures of that nation state” (Morrison, 16). Another definition states that crime is “any act or omission proscribed by the criminal law and thus punishable by the state through the criminal justice process” (Davies, 40). Both describe crime in its broadest sense but it does not tell us what constitutes...
Criminal Law
2 pages (500 words) , Coursework
Only on StudentShare
...Actus reus is defined as a criminal law that has all the elements of crime apart from the state of mind of the defendant. Strictly liability is defined as those crimes that need no proof of mens rea that is in relation to one more elements of the actus reus. The crime requires both mens rea (the mental element) and actus reus (physical element) of the crime. 2. a) Here the business was charged with a crime. b) Here the civil law was utilized to address the illegal acts. 3. a) Crime against health – These are actions that can cause may violate the health issues of the employees of the business. Both the business owner and the business would be charged for the crime... Criminal Law a) The main...
Principles of criminal liability
7 pages (1750 words) , Term Paper
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, concordance and causation. These principles are related to one another in a significant way as if one doesn’t satisfy, then it can change the whole scenario, and thus all should collectively... ? Principles of Criminal Liability Principles of Criminal Liability Criminal liability is the base through which we are able to form the logical structure on which the Criminal Law is standing. The principles of criminal liability are those elements of crime that have occurred or not but have to be proven by the prosecutor. Some of the crimes involve a subset that includes all the principles of the liability and thus, these are known as “crimes of criminal conduct”, whereas some of the crimes involve...
CRIMINAL LAW
2 pages (500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea” is depicted as. Since it’s clear, Ian was the one involved in the actual physical act or termed the “actus reus”, he should of course have to answer for his actions, as previously stated. This is especially true when considering the fact that Fred’s’ injury, lead to medical attention, which because of this treatment, lead to his untimely death (Wikipedia Encyclopedia 2005). As research goes further in this specific case, to determine Ians’ state of mind and intent it will continue to utilize... You’re 04 November 2005 Criminal Law Before this research can actually approach the incident that occurred between the two adolescent’s, (Ian and Fred) there first must be an...
Crime Movie Review
4 pages (1000 words) , Movie Review
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus (Lord Lane, C.J. in R v Nedrick [1986] 1 WLR 1025) of killing a person 2. The state of mind mens rea (Gammon Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong,1985) of intentional, purposeful, malicious, premeditated, and/or wanton. Murder is considered as the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought. English law defines murder as: "The unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen's Peace, with malice aforethought" Actus Reus: (Lord Lane, C.J. in R v Nedrick [1986... Business Law: 'A Time to Kill' is a Joel Schumacher film released in the year 1996. The story is about a lawyer and his assistant trying to save a father, who is on trial for murder. Carl Lee Hailey is a poor farm...
Criminal law
7 pages (1750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea, although some crimes are crimes... What constitutes a crime varies across people, places and time. You are required to examine different definitions of crime and comment on the function of the criminal law in addressing crime levels in the UK.  One definition of crime defines it as “an act or omission that leads to penal sanction in accordance with the constitutionally valid procedures of that nation state” (Morrison, 16). Another definition states that crime is “any act or omission proscribed by the criminal law and thus punishable by the state through the criminal justice process” (Davies, 40). Both describe crime in its broadest sense but it does not tell us what constitutes...
Mistake of fact
7 pages (1750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, mens rea and mistake of fact I. Defense for Johnny Juneau Johnny Juneau must be an unfortunate chap. Aside from not making much out of his life, he is now facing serious criminal charges of which he does not have the intention to commit. The charges hurled against him ranged from the possession of the nutria, theft of the gas, and the murder of the neighbor and faces long if not life jail term if convicted. The two charges, namely, murder and theft are the most serious of the three because if convicted, Johnny could be imprisoned for life. To begin with the defense of Johnny, it is important to stress the elements of a crime. Crime should... constitute...
Criminal law problem question
3 pages (750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...Actus reus; whether Archie had committed the act that led to the destruction of property in the garage. Analysis Proving the mens rea in this case would be simple as the events that led to the destruction of $6,000 worth of property were triggered with Archie catapulting the stone. As set out in Roper v Knott 2any diminution in value of property due... Criminal law Problems Is Archie liable to any criminal charges for his conduct? Issue In the case, Archie aims at a bird withhis catapult. However, the stone Archie catapulted misses the bird and accidentally land onto the windscreen of a passing bus which as a result veers off the road and clash into a garage. Subsequently, the crash triggers a chain of...
Johnny Juneau Case
7 pages (1750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, mens rea and mistake of fact I. Defense for Johnny Juneau Johnny Juneau must be an unfortunate chap. Aside from not making much out of his life, he is now facing serious criminal charges of which he does not have the intention to commit. The charges hurled against him ranged from the possession of the nutria, theft of the gas, and the murder of the neighbor and faces long if not life jail term if convicted. The two charges, namely, murder and theft are the most serious of the three because if convicted, Johnny could be imprisoned for life. To begin with the defense of Johnny, it is important to stress the elements of a crime. Crime should constitute actus... Johnny Juneau Case: illustrating...
Criminal Law (Advise Katarina, Paula, and Jenny as to their potential liability for homicide)
5 pages (1250 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, the defendant will not escape from conviction, no matter how noble his motive is (Ormerod 2011). In this respect you may please refer to the cases of Hyam vs DPP (1975), R v Ried (1992), State v. Asher (Ark. 1888). Actus Reus The other way round, actus reus in accordance with the broader definition of criminal law comprises all ingredients of a crime other than the state of mind... ? Criminal Law No: Advise Katarina, Paula, and Jenny as to their potential liability for homicide.Introduction The aims of criminal law do not culminate to punish people for their evil thoughts. An accused should be responsible for his misconduct / misdeeds, prohibited by the criminal law before liability may come...
CRIMINAL LAW
8 pages (2000 words) , Coursework
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus is an unlawful and dangerous act. In R V Slingsby (1995), a woman died when a man conducted dangerous sexual acts on her. Although the defendant argued that it was an ordinary sexual act that had gone out of scope, it was held that he was guilty because the act was dangerous and unlawful. In R V Church (1965), the term 'dangerous' was interpreted to mean that it exposes another person to a risk... ?Introduction This paper examines three questions that relate to criminal law. In each of the questions, there is an analysis of the main issues laidout in the requirements. This is followed by an evaluation of the relevant laws and cases that define the framework of the issues raised in English law. ...
Criminal Law
7 pages (1750 words) , Case Study
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus, mens rea, and defenses; b. The fire damage to the pub... Question: Alan has a paranoid personality and is prone to depression. Betty is Alan's girlfriend. She is having an affair with Clive and does not conceal this fact form Alan who feels demeaned and angry. Betty comes home form the pub one day and announces to Alan that she is going to leave him for Clive. She packs her bags and goes. Not knowing what to do, Alan picks up a hunting rifle and goes in search of Clive. He looks through the pub window and sees both Betty and Clive together. Whilst taking aim at Clive with the rifle, Dennis, an old friend from the pub, staggers over Alan and gives him a hard slap on the back. Alan stumbles...
Criminal Law LLB
3 pages (750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus of the offence/s you have identified. Firstly, Bob’s taking aim at Aran and his firing of a shot at the victim constitutes the actus reus or guilty acts that were intended to harm the victim. The objective element of Bob’s actions was to use his firearm to either murder or cause GBH upon Aran to an extent where he could no longer tease him. Although, the general impacts of his actions may be scanty considering that Aran escaped unhurt, Bob’s actions can be construed as physically well-intended to silence the victim hence the existence of the actus reus... Criminal Law Case Study Number Department Identify and define any homicide offences committed by Bob.There are three homicide offenses...
Criminal law
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus of theft, then mens rea, then conclude. Introduction: s1. Then, analyse the Actus Reus in s3(1), s4(1), s5(1). s3(1), s4(1), s5(1) need analyse too. Look at the scenario, and begin to identify what facts apply to the sections, with the relevant cases Then you do the same thing for mens rea: (s2) then s6, describe them, state that Roxy is dishonest and intends to deprive, then apply the ghosh test, and your outcome should be that she is guilty, and the prosecution will succeed here. This is a basic structure. However you can add whatever you need in order the answer... ?Assignment Roxy visited her local library to see if she could find the latest Agatha Banks detective novel. She intended to...
Concepts of Criminal Law
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus, which means a guilty act, Mens Rea, which means a guilty mind, mistake of fact and the mistake of law. This case presents ground for heated debate on the concepts of mistake of fact and mistakes of law. Key words:Mistake of fact, Mistake of Law, Mens Rea, Actus Reus. Concepts of Criminal Law The Defense Johnny Juneau is being charged with three crimes, the possession of Nutria, theft, and the murder of the neighbor to the store. Certain defenses arise from these acts which led... outlines that the level of Mens Rea required to convict Johnny does not exist. Johnny was acting under a mistake of fact, and good intentions. Due to this reasons the Jury should not convict him for the...
Criminal law
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus are the two core requirements that must be present at the same moment for a successful conviction. In other words, a criminal case cannot stand strong if mens rea and actus reus occur at different times, even if sequentially. On the other hand, strict liability refers to the criminal liability faced by a defendant, regardless of mens rea3, i.e. where it is absent. This paper explores the statement that “Theft... ? Criminal law By of 2966 Words Introduction The law that deals with crimes is referred to as criminal law. The shapers and foundations of criminal law are the numerous social standards and conducts set in different jurisdictions. This definition implies that criminal law seeks to...
Criminal Law: Grievous bodily harm
6 pages (1500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus of Joe was shown by his punching and kicking Pete. The broken ribs sustained by Pete certainly fall under the definition of grievous bodily harm as set forth in the statutory provision and in numerous cases. The mens rea of Joe is further manifested since he already saw Pete fall to the ground yet he "carried on kicking Pete, breaking several of his ribs." 2) Incitement of Tracey Minem for Joe Mack to continue inflicting harm on Pete. The liability of secondary parties is governed by s8 of the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861: "whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel or procure the commission of any indictable offence shall be liable to be...
Causation
6 pages (1500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus) combined with the state of mind (mens rea), and the actus reus plus the mens rea must have caused the actual crime.6 Moreover... ?  Criminal Responsibility and Causation There are many ways that causation is implicated in criminal cases. The general rule in English law, is thatthere must be a direct link between the behavior of the defendant and the person who was harmed by the defendant. One can look at English negligence law to find out how this works, because the rules are similar between English tort law and English criminal law. There are different tests for English causation in torts law. One is the but-for test, which means that the defendant is only liable if, but for his actions, the ...
Causation
6 pages (1500 words) , Download 1 , Essay
...actus reus) combined with the state of mind (mens rea), and the actus reus plus the mens rea must have caused the actual crime.6 Moreover... Criminal Responsibility and Causation There are many ways that causation is implicated in criminal cases. The general rule in English law, is that there must be a direct link between the behavior of the defendant and the person who was harmed by the defendant. One can look at English negligence law to find out how this works, because the rules are similar between English tort law and English criminal law. There are different tests for English causation in torts law. One is the but-for test, which means that the defendant is only liable if, but for his actions, the...
Law Essay - Criminal Law
9 pages (2250 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea of homicide, moving on to causation and eventually and analysis of the defences would be made. In accordance with the firmly embedded principle laid down by Article 6(2) ECHR it is evident that “Everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law”. This makes it quite clear that there is presumption whereby a person is deemed to be innocent unless the court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the criminal liability of the person, proved... Criminal Law The problem in this question relates to the law on homicide, causation as well as defences that may be available. In respect of the homicide the first and foremost discussion would be in respect of the...
Criminal Law - Homicide:Murder Problem
6 pages (1500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea. Briefly explain these two terms. {20 Marks} b) Discuss the criminal liability of Gordon for the offence he has committed against Thomas. {20 Marks} c) Consider whether the current law on Murder is satisfactory and discuss the possible reforms to murder which have been suggested. {40 Marks} The term actus reus refers to the act of the accused which when combined with either intention on the part of the accused or recklessness causes a crime to be committed. The actus reus for an offence will alter depending on the crime committed... Gordon decides to go out to the Tank Engine - a local pub. In the pub he stands at the bar but is distracted by Thomas, Annie and Clarabelle, ...
Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus. Mens rea is the guilty mind, the will to do that which was committed. Actus reus, on the other hand, refers to the actual act of committing the offence. Actus reus is the major component because a will to do something without the indication of the will does not amount to any offense (Herring, 2013). The consideration of mens rea is important because... Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law Feasibility of a conviction When a crime has been committed, the perpetrator of the crime will be called upon to answer for his acts. The law has come up with ways to ensure that a person who commits a crime is convicted for the crime. The primary components of any crime in most jurisdictions are mens rea and...
Offences Committed and Charges
15 pages (3750 words) , Download 1 , Case Study
...actus reus, b)mens rea, c)any possible defences d)apply them to the facts e)Give supporting authority-case or statute,or both f)Also ensure that you prove the actus reus, mens rea etc. don't juststate the ofence/defence,prove them.e.g.for provocation you would need to prove that the D suffered a sudden and temporary loss of self -control and that the provocation was sufficient to have caused a reasonable man to have acted similarly(all the while you support your statements with authority-case law or statute or both and apply to the facts before you... Mary and Rose were lovers. One evening Mary and Rose had an argument. Upset, Rose stormed out of the house and went to see her next-door neighbour,...
Criminal Law
14 pages (3500 words) , Coursework
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea for each of the elements would be discussed along with the defences. It is important to mention that for any offence to be proved it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and the burden of proof is on the prosecution. Another important point that needs to be raised is that the actus reus and mens rea of the offence must coincide, however a broad approach int his respect has been adopted by the courts. The first point of homicide is murder. The actus reus of mens rea was provided by Sir Edward Coke... in rerum natura is concerned it means that a human life is taken. Clearly this is satisfied as the child has died. Finally Queen’s peace means that it must have been...
Concept of Criminal Intent
2 pages (500 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus) and mental (mens rea) that includes causation and proof of intention, respectively (Azuelos-Atias, 2007, p. 16). Actus Reus. Actus Reus or the factual element of a crime is the act of the commission of the crime itself and the events surrounding it, which includes the person’s behavior, the circumstances of the commission of the crime, and causation (Azuelos-Atias, 2007, p. 16). “The circumstances may exist prior to the committing of the act, simultaneously with it, and sometimes it may even come into existence after it” (Bein, 1995 cited in Azuelos-Atias, 2007, p. 16). Causation involves the establishment that the result, for instance brain damage due to grievious bodily harm...
Domestic violence Case Study
8 pages (2000 words) , Case Study
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus is the act, which, in combination with a certain... Domestic violence consists of a series of abusive incidents, used by one person to control and dominate another with whom they have, or have had, a family relationship. The occurrence of domestic violence is independent of background and circumstance, sexuality, age, disability and gender; nonetheless, the majority of the offenders are male. In 2004, the Government defined domestic violence as: Any incident of threatening behaviour, violence or abuse [psychological, physical, sexual, financial or emotional] between adults who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality. Some of the tactics employed ...
Interpretation and Application to Facts of Extracts from Three Statutes
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus (the voluntary and wrongful act or wrongful omission that makes up the physical aspect of a crime). This is clearly seen in Alec seizing the sniffer dog, Bruno by the collar towards the van, with the intent of destroying the dog’s sharp olfactory senses. He intends to do this by exposing the dog to a chemical-impregnated rag. Just as is usually the case, there are several acts... Interpretation and Application to Facts of Extracts from Three Statutes Number Department Case A: Alec’s Criminal Liability for Attempted Criminal Damage to Bruno, under the S1 Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and the Criminal Damage Act, 1971 There is a solid ground for this case. In the first place, there is the Actus...
This question involves the interpretation and application to facts of extracts from three statutes
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus (the voluntary and wrongful act or wrongful omission that makes up the physical aspect of a crime). This is clearly seen in Alec seizing the sniffer dog, Bruno by the collar towards the van, with the intent of destroying the dog’s sharp olfactory senses. He intends to do this by exposing the dog to a chemical-impregnated rag. Just as is usually the case, there are several acts... Interpretation and Application to Facts of Extracts from Three Statutes Number Department Case A: Alec’sCriminal Liability for Attempted Criminal Damage to Bruno, under the S1 Criminal Attempts Act 1981 and the Criminal Damage Act, 1971 There is a solid ground for this case. In the first place, there is the Actu...
Analysis case about death
4 pages (1000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus. Mens rea refers to the intention of the accused or rather what the accused is thinking at the time of committing the crime... Criminal Law Death Case Analysis Betty’s liability for the death of Chloe Liability is the legal responsibility for acts committed or omissions. In criminal liability, the accused is found responsible for their acts which constitute a crime that leads to prosecution by the state, convicted and the appropriate punishment given. It ensures that justice is pursued and remedy or damages awarded. From the case at hand and facts therein, Betty is criminally liable for her acts. The requirements that constitute a crime are satisfied. That is, there is both mens rea and actus ...
Criminal Law
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reas? First, did Derek cause death or great bodily harm to Alan? The answer to this is yes, so the actus reus for homicide has been established. Second, can we... ?Introduction Derek killed Alan when Derek set fire to Alan’s flat while Alan was sleeping there, and Alan went to the hospital where he was given a transfusion of the wrong blood type. However, Alan called Derek a “worm” at the bar where Derek spotted Alan with Derek’s ex-girlfriend, so it is possible that Derek was sufficiently provoked to commit the act. However, the provocation occurred four hours before the actual act, so it is doubtful that provocation would be a valid defense. Another factor is that Derek was suffering from...
Is the current law on murder still acceptable?
6 pages (1500 words) , Assignment
Only on StudentShare
...Actus reus” and “Mens rea” are conducted at a time. A person is not liable of a crime unless the two elements are present i-e Actus reas and Mens rea. Both these terminologies have different meanings (explained in the next page of this document) according to the crime. Not only this but it hinges... ? ASSIGNMENT - LAW IS THE CURRENT LAW ON MURDER STILL ACCEPTABLE? S 5TH January 3, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document is a detailed study on laws against murderer. For the reader’s convenience, various legal citations have been stated. Legal system of England and whales are very briefly looked upon. In the end the laws for defences to murder and reforms in its reference are debated. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive...
Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub
3 pages (750 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...Actus Reus, Actus Menus and concurrence. In legal terms the, Actus Reus refers to the conduct of the accused and in order to declare the accused as criminal it is necessary to investigate the reason behind the act which causes the harm to the victim and the act must be a voluntary in nature . In the case of Mohammad vs Rajoub, it was found out that the officials in the custody had carried out their brutal act based on their own will and there was no force or compulsion which guided them to the killing process and during their trial the officials also did admitted the fact. So they were also held as guilty... ? Running Head: CASE OF MOHAMAD VS RAJOUB Case of Mohamad vs Rajoub Case and Summary The case of...
LL1014 CRIMINAL LAW I
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus me invito factus non est mens actus" which means "an act done by a person against his will is not his act at all". Actus reus: " Actus reus" is such result of human conduct as the law seeks to prevent. The act done or omitted must be an act forbidden or commanded by some law. Russel calls "actus reus" as the physical result of human conduct ( Russel, Crime,vol.1,p.20). Actus reus includes negative as well as positive elements. Actus reus by omission is well illustrated in an English case of Gibbins V. Proctor (1918,13 Cr Appeal Rep.134 ). Mens rea : It is defined as " the mental element necessary to constitute criminal liability... on the subject. The conception of mens rea was...
Robbery
1 pages (250 words) , Coursework
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus... Crime of Robbery Kazim Rizvi Crime of Robbery Yes, the defendant can be convicted of the crime of Robbery, since he went to the house of the Plaintiff and used his rifle to steal it away from him. Arguments for Defendant A man cannot be convicted of robbery if he can prove in the Court of Law that the purpose for which he was involved in the situation of ‘robbery’ does not in fact amount to robbery in the first place. Over here, the defendant went to the plaintiff’s house not with the intention to rob the plaintiff off his gun. His motive was not to steal a gun, and in criminal law the concept of mens rea, which is the guilty mind is extremely important to convict a man of a crime. Since the...
Criminal Law Assignment
8 pages (2000 words) , Essay
Only on StudentShare
...actus reus and mens rea for each of the elements would be discussed along with the defences. First Barry’s liability for Alice’s death will be considered. The starting point for criminal law is Article 6(2) ECHR which states that “Everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the law. The burden of proof is on prosecution who has to prove it beyond all reasonable doubt, or satisfy the jury of the guilt of the defendant. (Woolmington v. DPP)1 It is important to mention that for any offence to be proved it must be proved beyond... reasonable doubt and the burden of proof is on the prosecution. Another important point that needs to be raised is that the...
1 - 50 results of 299 items