Same-Sex Couple Families - Article Example

Same-Sex Couple Families This paper reviews the article d “Same-Sex Couples' Kids Less Likely to Have Private Health Insurance: Study” by Amy Norton, drawing few noteworthy inferences regarding the stressors inhibiting the confidence level of same-sex couples to raise their children. Accordingly, the paper critically evaluates the narrated facts in the article to obtain a thoughtful understanding to the problem exhibited throughout the discussion. Summary The article titled “Same-Sex Couples' Kids Less Likely to Have Private Health Insurance: Study” by Amy Norton made an attempt to depict about the challenges faced by Same-Sex Couple Families in today’s society.

The article illustrates with precision about the fact that children of same-sex parents are more likely to be restricted from getting private health insurance for themselves. The study mainly highlights about the less talked about facet of Gay marriage. Subsequently, it has been depicted in the article that access to health insurance results in deep impacts on health conditions of children in same-sex couple’s families. However, this benefit is not assured by employers to children of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) employees.

In order to get precise and firm understanding about the fact, the article emphasizes the results of federal survey on children of same-sex parents. The survey presented that children living with same-sex parents are 39 to 45 percent less likely to get health insurance as compared to kids living with their a heterosexual parents. However, in states where same-sex marriages are found legal, kids with same-sex parents should have the benefit of getting private health insurance under specified conditions.

Furthermore, in-spite of having legal approval from law, these same-sex couples involving two mothers are deemed as ineligible to have the benefits of health insurance for their children, which is thus only restricted to the male couple (U.S. News & World Report, 2013). The article also depicts that in some of the states, in-spite of the legalization of marriage among LGBTs, employer-sponsored health benefits are not provided to such same-sex families. This is because of the fact that federal laws in those nations or states do not recognize health coverage of children of such parents legal and it comes under the tax slab enacted by the government.

That is, if employers provide health coverage to these couples or their family members, they will have to pay extra tax to the government, which in turn discourages them to provide equal benefits to same-sex families. It has been specifically mentioned in the article that in the absence of tax barrier, same-sex parents would have enjoyed a good time around (Norton, 2013)). Review of the Article With reference to Norton (2013), it has been ascertained that only two-third of the US children of same-sex parents enjoy the facility of private health insurance, which if compared to that of heterosexual couple’s families depicts around 78 percent.

This fact clearly advocates in favor of disparity persisting within the family welfare benefits attained by same-sex couples and heterosexual couples. On further analysis, the article focused on the hurdles faced by the same-sex couples even if this homosexual marriage is legal in their state. The fundamental reason behind it is that the Federal law is yet to legalize LGBT marriages, which causes dismissals at the state level in terms of uniformity and thereby, encouraging the involved participants to treat same-sex couples with equal benefits (Norton, 2013; Anisma & Merali, 1999).

The article unambiguously addresses the effects of various stressors on the same-sex family context, rendering due significance towards the loopholes persisting within the enacted legal framework for LGBT marriages, by presenting the issue as a noteworthy one with the aid of news media. Basic characteristics related to stressor comprise of the type of stressor and its controllability. In relation to the inferences drawn by Norton (2013), same-sex couples face social stress to a greater extent.

It has been comprehended correspondingly that society still restrains itself from accepting same-sex marriages with equal integrity as in the case of heterosexual couples, even if it has become legal in many countries. As a consequence, same sex couples face immense problem when mingling with the society, which is not ready to accept them openly. Children of such couples also undergo the same stressors and challenges, which often hinders their healthy psychological growth generating a feeling of segregation and humiliation among them.

Apparently, societal stressors faced by same-sex couples and their children need immediate control measures (Anisma & Merali, 1999). If argued from a critical point of view, the main reason for such stressors to be acting in the society even after the legalization of same-sex marriages is the setback of the laws enacted by the government. No doubt, same-sex couples feel humiliated owing to their segregation from the mainstream of life irrespective of the open acceptance made by law. This further raise many questions regarding the challenges today same-sex couples are facing.

For example, what is the fundamental reason of enacting laws that has failed to attain its determined objectives without further amendments; if same-sex marriages are yet not accepted whole heartedly in the society is there any scope for such laws; does not the enactment of such laws hinder the pride of the law enforcers and simultaneously humiliate the expected beneficiaries. References Anisma, H., & Merali, Z. (1999). Understanding stress: characteristics and caveats. Retrieved from http://pubs.niaaa.nih.

gov/publications/arh23-4/241-249.pdf Norton, A. (2013). Same-sex couples' kids less likely to have private health insurance: study. Retrieved from http://health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2013/09/16/same-sex-couples-kids-less-likely-to-have-private-health-insurance-study