Slavery in the West - Research Paper Example

May 11, Slavery in the West During the Mexico-American War (1846-1848), the Reserve Wilmot was a bill in Congress to prohibit slavery in new territories, never past problems, but much controversy. The Compromise of 1850 prevented an immediate political crisis to solve territorial problems arising from the war with Mexico. However, he raises the issue of fugitive slaves. The Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 beat the previous commitments and intensely inflamed the issue that divided the slave power, Republicans denounced the alleged slave control over the national government. Republicans responded with a plan for long-term abandonment of slavery: to prevent its spread, and wither in the face of the policy more efficient and effective freedom to work. In fact, slavery was already in rapid decline in the Border States and cities, because they could not compete with free labor. In the 1850s, tensions between revived by the same problem that produced dating back to the Missouri Compromise of 1820: slavery in the territories. Northerners and southerners in fact came to define "Manifest Destiny" in different ways, undermining nationalism as a unifying force. The Compromise of 1850 relating to the acquisition of territory after the Mexican-American War. It includes a provision for the execution of fugitive slave who led a series of small local events in the North, which has expressed concern about slavery. Most people think of the compromise amendment was finished as a regional problem, but Stephen A. Douglas again in 1854, and the name of democracy. Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Bill aims to open a huge new range of high quality, clearing and settlement. As an American of Chicago, Chicago was particularly interested in the track link in Kansas and Nebraska, but it was a moot point. More importantly, Douglas was a firm believer in democracy at the grassroots level that the actual settlers have the right to decide on slavery, not politicians from other states. Finally, the popular reaction has come, but the leaders had the spark. Chase Appeal of Independent Democrats "did much to educate the public. In New York, William H. Seward finally took charge of organizing a demonstration against the Nebraska bill, since none had arisen spontaneously. Press as National period, the New York Tribune, and local magazines free of soil, condemned the bill. Convinced that Northern society was better than the south and more convinced than ever a threat to the efforts of the South to expand the slave power of its current borders, the north has been a global approach, which has a risk of conflict, but conflict required power of the Republican Party. Republican Party - a people's campaign, emotional release of "free country" is the border - took over the White House after only six years of existence. The Republican Party was born of the controversy over the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Once the Northern reaction against the Kansas-Nebraska Act took place, its leaders have acted to promote a different political reorganization. Henry Wilson said the death Whig Party and vowed to oppose any attempt to revive it. Horace Greeley Tribune has called for the formation of a new party of the North, and Benjamin Wade, Chase, Charles Sumner and others have talked about the union of all opponents of the law of Nebraska. Tribune Gamaliel Bailey was involved in calling a caucus of anti-slavery Whig and Democratic Party members of Congress in May. Meeting in a church in Ripon, Wisconsin, congregations, February 28, 1854 some thirty opponents of the law of Nebraska called for organizing a new political party and suggested that "Republican" would be the most appropriate name ( to link their cause with the Declaration of Independence). rights activists, the mind has played a leading role in creating the Republican Party in most northern states during the summer of the 1854th While conservatives and moderates were content to call for the restoration of the Compromise Missouri or prohibition of slavery extension, radical supporters of repealing the Fugitive Slave Laws. But without the benefit of hindsight, would the 1854 election suggests the possible victory of know-nothing movement, rather than fight against slavery, with the Church Catholic / immigrant question replacing slavery as the issue is capable of mobilizing mass appeal. Knowing little things, for example, captured the candidate of Mayor of Philadelphia with a majority of more than 8,000 votes in 1854. Even after the opening of the controversy with his huge Kansas-Nebraska Act, Senator Douglas began speaking of things to know little, rather than Republicans, as the main threat to the Democratic Party. When Republicans spoke of themselves as part of "free labor," they appealed to a base growing, primarily middle class, not permanent employees or unemployed (working class). When they extolled the virtues of free labor, they were merely reflects the experience of millions of men who had "succeeded" and millions of others who had a realistic hope of doing so. Those who had not been "included Irish immigrants, who made a large proportion of workers in plant growing in the North. Republicans often saw the Catholic working class because they lack the qualities of self-discipline, temperance and sobriety essential to his vision of ordered liberty. Republicans insisted that there was a strong correlation between education, religion, hard work and values ??of the "Protestant work ethic" and vote Republican. "When Free schools are considered a nuisance, where religion is the lazy man is honest and lavish state, "said an editorial in the pro-Republican Chicago Democratic Press after the defeat of James Buchanan, John C. Fremont in the election U.S. President 1856, "Buchanan has received his strongest support." Events over the next two years, "Bleeding Kansas" sustained the popular fervor initially aroused in some northern Kansas-Nebraska Act They encouraged the printing of the North and the pulpit, and a powerful propaganda organs of the death penalty. Often they received financial assistance to support organizations like the Massachusetts Emigrant Society. Those in the south are often financed by the communities they left behind. South tried to defend their constitutional rights and to maintain sufficient political strength to reject "the hostile and destructive legislation." The problem of slavery has exploded into violence in Kansas in 1855. Most new residents wanted a good country, not a political debate. elements of pro-slavery encouraged immigration at the Missouri, these immigrants were poor peasants who did not own slaves. anti-slavery forces in New England to fund and organize the migration of anti-slavery settlers. Then abolitionist John Brown brought his son to fight for the name of God against slavery. They killed several men known to be in favor of slavery (even if it did not own slaves) and the "Pottawatomie Massacre" of 24 May 1856. Template: Quote box "Bleeding Kansas" reached a symbol of the cross-sectional area of ??controversy, and it seemed to disprove the idea that democracy cannot allow people who start their own solutions. However, the 1856 campaign was conducted almost exclusively on the issue of slavery, irregular as the struggle for democracy and aristocracy, focusing on the question Kansas. Republicans condemned the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the extension of slavery, but an advanced program of internal improvements, combining idealism of the anti-slavery with the economic aspirations of the North. The new party rapidly developed a powerful partisan culture, and the energetic activity has pushed voters to the polls with unprecedented numbers. People react much. Young Republicans organized in "Wide Awake" clubs and chanted "Free Soil, Free labor, free men, Fremont" Southern fire-eaters and even some moderates uttering threats of secession if Fremont won the Democratic candidate, Buchanan, has benefited from fears for the future. References The Question of Slavery in the West, http://www.nobleednews.com/westward_expansion_and_slavery.htm Read More