The paper “Evidence from Privatization” seeks to evaluate the transfer of ownership and the management of state-owned enterprises to private firms. Governments should be less corrupted so as to increase the efficiency of state-owned corporations and the public sector…
However, due to limited budgets, governments have been unable to develop all part of the economy equally. Further problems like inadequate use of knowledge, experience and specialization in the management of the various sectors occur and citizens may not receive goods and services from the public enterprises effectively. Lack of competition in the public sector contributes a great deal in the inefficiencies, corruption and lack of motivation in public enterprises (Khan et al., 2012). The main reason governments have opted for privatization is the belief that private firms can make a more efficient and effective use of available resources than governments and at the same time profit the government from the higher revenues privatisation creates. It is also believed that privatisation may result to increased efficiency productivity and liquidity in the financial markets but on the other hand, lead to unemployment and dependency on foreign capital from multinational companies hence decline in a nation’s wealth and social welfare (Han, 2012). Full privatisation may have occurred especially in the services sector but it is generally not ideal for governments to conduct a full privatisation. Where natural resources and sensitive goods and or services for instance nuclear energy, partial privatisation is preferred. In this case, the government gives part of the ownership to a private firm, so that it can still have active control in the operations. Privatisation can take place either through share issue privatisation (SIP) which involves selling shares on the stock market or selling the whole firm or part of it to a strategic buyer by auction, asset sale, voucher privatisation or shares of ownership distributed to all citizens (at a low fee or even for free). SIP is the most common and it extends the domestic capital markets and increases the investment opportunities which in turn will stimulate economic growth though some risk is involved. Finding enough buyers could be a problem and as a result the prices drop and the capital gains become insignificant, in turn the transaction costs become high. Asset sale privatisation is common in developing countries. Voucher privatisation was common in the former socialist economies during the transition process. Asset sale and share privatisation are usually beneficial to the government as bidders normally compete and hence offer a high price which makes more money for the government (Walailuck and Christian-Oliver, 2011). Evaluation of privatisation should be from a point of view of the society’s well-being, not from the profit maximisation of the firms. The welfare of the people and the country in general and the state of its economy should be continually improved. There is a general view that all government involvement in the market represents some restrictions to business liberty so it has become intrinsically detrimental. Privatisation is a form of withdrawal of government involvement in business. Since 1980, many European countries have launched privatisation programs with the Great Britain being referred to as the origin of modern privatisation (Ioannis, 2012). Privatisation leads to enhanced economic performance. ...
Cite this document
(“See attached file Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/106022-see-attached-file
(See Attached File Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“See Attached File Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/106022-see-attached-file.
Privatization of public enterprises has been a much debated subject over the years. To define, “privatization is the procedure of transferring possession of a business, enterprise, agency, or public service from the public sector to the private sector” (Times of Switzerland).
This has guided to the growth of an imposing body of jurisprudence which is both in the Strasbourg and in the United Kingdom. In any criminal actions there can be opposing interests, for instance national security or they require to defend the observers who are at risk of reprisals or to maintain the secret police techniques for examining crimes, which have to be weighed against the liberties of the accused.
According to Weingarten, Gene’s: "The Police Couldn't Hide Their Lying Eyes” case, it would have certainly not be possible to understand that the “Eye” police officer was lying in his testimony, until the fine details were given regarding the clothing and the item that the defendant was described to have been possessing (Weingarten, n.d.).
In industries such as electricity, gas water, telecommunications- more extensive regulation, with regard to structure not just conduct, is required whenever international competition is not vigorous. (Stiglitz 1994, 307-323)
Privatisation was a response to the view that some state companies were not natural monopolies, and that even natural monopolies were better handled by arms length regulation that committed the government not to intervene perpetually.
Airport privatization is a significant part of the aviation industry and the participation of private sector in the development and operation of airports is quite a conventional notion world-wide. This approach for privatization of airport and facility development is increasingly relied upon countries who find it intricate to develop and maintain their own airports.
As the benefits of modern medical practices percolated through the system, more and more people looked to medical care as a right. This made medical care a socio-economic issue, forcing the government to take responsibility for medical services under various schemes such as Medicare and the National Health Service (NHS).
Privatization is a process in which government functions and responsibilities are transferred to private entities. The transfer can be either a complete one or it can be a part of a government function.
Privatization is not new to United
In New Delhi, India, the large number of population increased the cost of solid waste management in the city leading to poor services by the municipal authorities. This research paper discusses such problem and analyzes the waste management costs in India as well as it's benefits and it's disadvantage for country, government and citizens.
The term Privatization has several meanings. It is the transfer of some sort from the government to the private sector. It is the transfer of government-owned organizations to the private sector, either to a business making profits or even not-for-profit organizations. This term also refers to the sale of shares in government-owned industries.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Evidence from Privatization for FREE!