You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Brief the case of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)
Finance & Accounting
Pages 3 (753 words)
Case of Holmes v. South Carolina Criminal Law Hypothetical Facts: In the year of 1989, a woman of 86 year of age was assaulted, raped and robbed at her residence in South Carolina. The injuries resulted from attack led to the death of the woman in the following year.
However Holmes denied the charges and confessed that the crime was committed by a third party named Jimmy Mc Caw White. Holmes was of the opinion that the police framed him in this crime. Defendant also produces several witnesses who claimed that the third party was found in the premises of the crime scene during the hours of crime. Holmes produced several witnesses to prove that he was innocent in this case and was trapped by the police. He also asserted that the forensic results were manipulated by poor handling by the police officer. Issue: Is Holmes guilty for the death of the old women in South Carolina? Any case in order to be justified needs solid evidence against the person who is guilty. Moreover there is argument from the defendant that police his trying to frame him .Holmes suggested that The crime was committed by a third party and also produced witnesses for the same. The only proof against Holmes was the palm print, fiber of clothing and DNA elements found at the vicinity and on victim respectively. .It was a known fact that the police officer handling the case dealt with evidence collection in a negligent manner. He collected the samples with bare hand and henceforth the results were not trust worthy. The issue before the court is that, on what basis they can prove the guiltiness of the defendant as to the crime. ...
Not exactly what you need?