However Holmes denied the charges and confessed that the crime was committed by a third party named Jimmy Mc Caw White. Holmes was of the opinion that the police framed him in this crime. Defendant also produces several witnesses who claimed that the third party was found in the premises of the crime scene during the hours of crime. Holmes produced several witnesses to prove that he was innocent in this case and was trapped by the police. He also asserted that the forensic results were manipulated by poor handling by the police officer. Issue: Is Holmes guilty for the death of the old women in South Carolina? Any case in order to be justified needs solid evidence against the person who is guilty. Moreover there is argument from the defendant that police his trying to frame him .Holmes suggested that The crime was committed by a third party and also produced witnesses for the same. The only proof against Holmes was the palm print, fiber of clothing and DNA elements found at the vicinity and on victim respectively. .It was a known fact that the police officer handling the case dealt with evidence collection in a negligent manner. He collected the samples with bare hand and henceforth the results were not trust worthy. The issue before the court is that, on what basis they can prove the guiltiness of the defendant as to the crime. How can the court claim that Holmes committed the crime on the women? Court draws conclusion based on evidence found at the crime scene .With regard to this case all the forensic evidence provided was unreliable due to the poor handling of samples by the police officer. Rule: According to federal rule of evidence, rule 702 is a key one. Cornell University of law(2010) states that “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case”. Analysis: The Federal rule of evidence is crucial here as the whole case is centered around the validity of the forensic evidence found on the vicinity and victim. Once a crime is committed there should be strong evidence against the defendant in order to sentence the defendant. Even though, the evidence is found, the authenticity of it cannot be established due to the manipulation of them by the police officer. . The forensic result of the crime scene was not authentic as the police officer collected the samples without using gloves. This is against the law as samples are not obtained following the principles laid down by the civil procedure. Since the reliability of the evidence is very questionable, the court cannot pass any order against Holmes which prove him guilty Conclusion: Since the U.S. Supreme Court was not satisfactory about the credibility of the forensic results, there are no grounds to accuse the defendant of the crime. At the same time the probability of the involvement of the third party was ruled out on the basis of evidence found on the crime scene. Finally it can be concluded that Holmes involvement in the rape and murder could not be established due to lack of genuine evidence. Work cited Law School, Cornell University. (2010, December).
Case of Holmes v. South Carolina Criminal Law Hypothetical Facts: In the year of 1989, a woman of 86 year of age was assaulted, raped and robbed at her residence in South Carolina. The injuries resulted from attack led to the death of the woman in the following year…
The current paper discusses various political, economic, socio-cultural and technological conditions that have an impact on Google’s international strategy, particularly in maintaining its spot as a well-known search engine service provider all over the globe, while endeavoring to penetrate the booming South African e-commerce market.
We will mainly target influential people in these departments and agencies, such as the Secretary of Transport and the heads of the other agencies (Walker, 1997 and BBC, 2003).
My firm will endeavour to persuade
t can be performed by the company was often defined by the Companies Act 1989 and today effectively removed by the Companies Act 2006 (ultimately implemented from 1st October 2009)2. Earlier, any kind of contract or agreement that was entered with any other party beyond the
represents Teresa and Kurt R. Welterndorf is the representative for Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. in the Court of Appeal. Therefore, Teresa is the plaintiff/appellant and Pfeil is the defendant/appellee.
The case, Teresa D. Oglesbee v. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. is a premises
In the facts of the case, the plaintiff had contracted the defendant to take a component of his mill’s steam engine to Joyce & Co after it broke down. The breakdown caused the plaintiff to close down the mill
animous ruling on the case on May 17, 1954 did not only overturn previous rulings on the same subject matter but also set precedence for other numerous similar cases to in the country. the ruling on the case marked the beginning of change of mind, social perception and legal
In 2011, the world’s population was estimated to have reached 7 billion; a remarkable rise given that only 60 years ago it was pegged at around 2.5 billion (Weiss). This by itself is however not alarming given
Ideally, people have to work on meeting their common needs while working on the best means of presenting their communication. The role of any brief is to pass on important information to the intended audience within the required timeframe. Though brief one can be said to be
2 pages (500 words)Coursework
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com