Running Head: Direct and Representative Democracy Direct and Representative Democracy [The [The Name of the Institution] Direct and Representative Democracy Democracy, in Greek, is derived from demokratia, the root meanings of which are demos (people) and kratos (rule)…
It is perhaps better conceived as two aspects of the same thing that can not be separated with clear lines. First, it is a practice or method of government, a set of forms and procedures. Second, it relates to ends rather than means, to an ideal or set of ideals. A direct democracy is a political system in which all citizens are allowed to influence policy by means of a direct vote on any particular issue. However it is impracticable except in a very small polity. Even though it was practiced in Athens, it didn't involve all the people, only adult male citizens. Representative democracy can simply be defined as an indirect democracy in which the people do not themselves govern but elect representatives who govern them. As for the relation between electoral and representative democracy, it will suffice to note that the former is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition of the latter. This is also to say that the concept of representative democracy comprehends electoral democracy; but the reverse is not true. While modern democracies are jointly electoral and representative, an electoral democracy that does not elect representatives is a distinct possibility. The other two notions--direct democracy and referendum democracy--require a somewhat more detailed explication. Although a direct democracy can be simply defined a contrario, that is, as a democracy without representatives and without representational transmission belts, yet this specimen displays subspecies that command separate recognition. Any direct democracy is, in some sense, a self-governing democracy. But we know that the meaning of self-government crucially hinges on the size factor; (Banducci, 1998, 116) so does the meaning and reality of direct democracy. A literal, authentically self-governing direct democracy can be said to exist only with reference to relatively small groups--say, up to assembly-size groups. Beyond the assembly size, the most meaningful distinction is between observable direct democracy, and a direct democracy whose size escapes direct observability, that is, a greater than observable one. The democracy of the ancients qualifies as observable, for it resolved itself not only in the gathering of the citizens in a single place but in an observable behaviour of the participants. But the magnitude that allows for such observability is in the order of a few thousands. And that order of magnitude already brings about a great deal of indirectness in a direct democracy. Only in part was Greek democracy truly and authentically "direct." And when we come to a greater-than-observable direct democracy, what makes it direct is only, or basically, the inference that it is not a representative kind of democracy. The notion of referendum democracy will help to qualify this last assertion. The original idea of a representative was of a person elected to express or reflect the views of his constituents. (Raphael, 1990, 91) However, this does not seem possible, the representative needs to gather his constituents and get the view of them on every issue. Therefore the representative chosen is not obliged to mirror the ideas of his constituents rather he is elected as a man of good judgement. This is a doctrine often known as Edmund Burke's Principle, which states that representatives should act upon their own conscience in the affairs of a representative democracy. Nevertheless in practice, the inevitable rise of the well disciplined party system has caused representatives to decide under the ...
Cite this document
(“Political ideas, under international relations Coursework”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/19622-political-ideas-under-international-relations
(Political Ideas, under International Relations Coursework)
“Political Ideas, under International Relations Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/19622-political-ideas-under-international-relations.
People belonging to racial groups or the racial groups themselves are not stigmatised at all, the terms used to describe them is what makes it so stigmatising. The context in which the terms are used is even more discriminating than the term itself.
The philosopher observed that the human ideals and morals that would be desirable for the smooth running of operations in a society might not be easily put into place (Thorsen, 2004, p.5). The divergent human values experienced in a given society often conflict with each other and the choice as to which of the values should be appropriate may not be easy to make.
Academic discourse on the topic has often been framed within the polarised international relations theory paradigms of neo-liberalism versus realism (Randin, 2006). This paper critically evaluates the fundamental elements underlying traditional and contemporary international relations and considers which theoretical model is more persuasive.
The international relations theory has been introduced aiming to explain the criteria on which the relations among states are based. Gradually, the international relations theory has been transformed in order to respond to the current social and political needs worldwide; this transformation has led to the development of an independent theoretical field – independent towards the pre-existing international relation theory, as was initially established.
oil. Following this acknowledgement, Europe began a process of induction whereby, Africa was awarded an entry into the economic and political arena of the modern world however; this invitation arrived with the subordination of colonialism, leaving the African society without a choice of refusal.2 While, the enduring implications of the colonization of Africa have been assessed by scholars and researchers in the light of the economic consequences of the process on the societies that are present in the continent, the purpose of this paper is focused towards examining the significance of Africa’s colonization on international relations.
We need theorie to make ene of the blizzard of information that bombard u daily. Even policymaker who are contemptuou of "theory" mut rely on their own (often untated) idea about how the world work in order to decide what to do. It i hard to make good policy if one' baic organizing principle are flawed, jut a it i hard to contruct good theorie without knowing a lot about the real world.
As a result, economic interdependence and interaction between countries are becoming ever stronger. In this massive tide of economic globalisation, no country can develop and prosper in isolation. China has learnt from her long history that isolation leads to backwardness.
The essay "International Relations" examines the core ideas of the traditional and the contemporary theories of international relations that led to the assumption that both these theories address specific needs; however, the traditional international relations theory can be characterized as rather outdated, having to be aligned with current social and political trends and practices.