This theory requires the plaintiff to prove that the employer is biased against a specific group. A prima facie case is established when: (1) the defendant identifies a specific employment practice to be challenged; and (2) through relevant statistical analysis proves that the challenged practice has an adverse impact on a protected group. Walsh, D. J. (2010, pg 210). Here Dunlap couldn’t present any evidence which connected his interview and the practices used during that interview with that of the other candidates that were part of the interview process. Thus there was no statistical proof to compare and contrast the rest of the interviews with his own in front of the court and show how TVA misused its authority and purposely rejected him. This lack of evidence meant that the court should not accept Dunlap’s appeal for disparate impact thus the claim failed. In the disparate treatment the plaintiff has to prove how the employer is biased against a selected group of individuals based on their cast, color, origin or religion. A clear case is established when: (1) The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination; (2) the employer must articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions; and (3) the plaintiff must prove that the stated reason was in fact pretextual. (Walsh, D. J., 2010, pg 210). This law is clearly provided in the case and transcribed. The disparate treatment claim was however successful as Dunlap was able to provide a strong case of racial discrimination. The Tennessee Valley Authority needed to provide a valid reason to reject the plaintiff which it did by providing the selection matrix used during Dunlap’s interview. Here Dunlap was able to rebut the selection matrix and showed how the selection committee decided to distribute the marks for the final score. The committee agreed that seventy percent marks be kept for the interview while the other thirty percent be given for the education, training and experience. This distribution did not correspond with the company’s policies which clearly stated that the burden of the final score be based on technical experience, education and training. Thus the selection committee violated the policies without informing any of the candidates and changed the calculation of the final score from an objective measurement (favors education and training) towards a subjective measurement (favors communication skills). Dunlap’s claim was a success as he successfully proved the pretextual nature of TVA’s stated reason. He showed how they manipulated the selection matrix to reduce his score in comparison to the other applicants so that he does not make the top ten. Dunlap narrated examples which showed how the selection committee had a biased approach. He stated that his attendance record was excellent with only a few leaves, quite similar to that of a couple of white applicants but the marks he and the other applicants received varied significantly. Similarly on another occasion he had a better safety record than most, still he received lesser marks as compared to the white applicants. In addition to this the court was able to find a connection in the “score balancing” process and how the number of “outstanding” candidates exactly equaled the job vacancies. The scores were changed after the interviews thus
DUNLAP V TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority David Dunlap sued Tennessee Valley Authority under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The basis of the case being racial discrimination and contradiction of TVA rules on conducting interviews, measuring candidate merit and the manipulation of the matrix scores by Tennessee Valley Authority…
3HRC Parts A & B: Roads and Transport Authority (RTA) Activity A As a new manager is starting in the Roads and Transport Authority (RTA) shortly, one is tasked to provide a report to this new-starter, so that the manager can gain some understanding of the organization in preparation for their start.
The respondents were Leo Martinez, Acting Chancellor and Dean of Hastings College of Law, University of California; Jacqueline Ortega, Student Services Director; the Board of Directors of Hastings College of Law, University California: Donald Bradley, Tina Combs, Maureen Corcoran, Marci Dragun, Carin T.
“Short Haul V/S Long Haul Airlines”. Why is it easier to set up a short haul low cost airline compared with long haul low cost airline? Short hauls are the domestic flights, which have the departure and arrival airport in the same country they cover the distance of approximately 800 km within 1.5 hours.
In this case, the stringing is stimulated. The game is linked to archery, which is considered as one of the three offensive skills that are weapon based. The skills govern bows’ use and are raised by the use of such bows as well as crossbows. This paper is about the V-Archery and tries to find out whether the use of vibration improves the user experience leading to better targeting.
The 2001 court case of 99 Cent Only Stores v. Lancaster Redevelopment Agency involved 99 Cent Only Stores attempting to block Lancaster from acquiring their property. Lancaster wanted to obtain the property in order to allow Costco to expand rather than follow through with their threat of leaving Lancaster.
Management is usually about agreeing with the views of experts in different fields of organizational operations for the better results. Sometimes managers find it hard to accept the points of others but the
f realism but showing some character traits which may be described as nascent though masculine, a character that is overwhelmingly irresistible to Stella. Blanche is Stella’s sister who under circumstances of duress sold the family plantation, lived in Belle Reve where she
is case, Marbury had received an appointment in the last days of the reign of President John Adam which when Thomas Jefferson assumed the presidency, Madison being Secretary of State never appointment Marbury. Marbury sort the court for a writ of Mandamus to compel Madison to
1 pages (250 words)Coursework
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com