Answer to Question #1 Eddie has a legally binding contract with Adele. Generally, price quotes are not offers for it is no more than an invitation to treat. The courts will look at the language used in the light of the circumstances in which it is used and into the subsequent actions of both parties to determine whether what is said by the seller is a mere quotation of price or an offer to sell as held in the case of Canadian Dyers Association vs…
It can be gleaned from the communications made by herein parties their intention to enter into a contract. Under s.64 of Restatement, acceptance given by telephone or other medium of substantially instantaneously two-way communication is governed by the principles applicable to acceptances where the parties are in the presence of each other. Hence, if Eddie had intended to revoke the contract, he should have manifested the same on Tuesday. In the case of Megalift v Terminals  NSWSC 324, the court ruled that both parties were already in negotiation, discussing terms and details such as transportation and delivery. These conversations involved quotations and although no fixed price was agreed upon, it was nonetheless a contract, which was legally binding. Moreover, her Honour disregarded the quotation for the purpose of a budget only. This did not prevent the parties from contracting. Answer to question # 2. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) places a number of restrictions on the contract terms businesses can agree to. Specifically, it lays down rules for the ways in which vendor businesses can use exclusion clauses to limit liability in certain areas. (Business Link, Buyers' terms and conditions and unfair contract terms). The business selling the goods or services isn't allowed to exclude liability for: death or injury - under any circumstances, losses caused by negligence - unless to do so is 'reasonable' and defective or poor quality goods - unless to do so is 'reasonable' (Ibid.) Liability for negligence that causes other types of damage are subjected to a test for “reasonableness” (Alistaire 2009, Exclusion clauses and unfair contract terms Part 2). S.2(1) of the UCTA states that “A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice given to persons generally or to particular persons exclude or restrict his liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.” Under s2(1) no one acting in the course of a business can exclude or restrict his liability in negligence for death or personal injury by means of a term in a contract or by way of notice (Law Teacher 2011, Exclusion and Limiting Clauses). Bambi cannot make reference to the notice on the desk that excludes or restricts its liability in case of claim for damages resulting from its negligence. UCTA is the main statutory provision, which regulates exclusion clauses and can either render a term effective, ineffective or subject to the test of reasonableness. It applies to business liability as between businesses or a business and a consumer. Therefore, if parties are not acting in the course of a business, say for example a contract between two private individuals, they can exclude liability. UCTA applies to exclusion clauses in the course of a business in three situations:1. Negligence 2. Consumer 3. Standard Term Contracts (Gillhams Lawyers 2008, Business and Commercial Contract Terms). Negligence is failure to use reasonable care. It is the doing of something which a reasonably prudent person would not do, or the failure to do something, which a reasonably prudent person would do under like circumstances. It is a departure from what an ordinary ...
Cite this document
(“Introduction to business law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/30929-introduction-to-business-law
(Introduction to Business Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
“Introduction to Business Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/30929-introduction-to-business-law.
From this research it is clear that even though Dodd’s argument received government favor in 1930s, all along, Berle’s argument has been in mind of people. The company act 2006 has borrowed a lot from Berle and Dodd debate in 1930s. It has attempted to link their argument and proposed neither a non-pure popularity theory nor a shareholders supremacy theory.
The chances of this happening are therefore minimized if the parties contracting understand the concept of what they are agreeing to, the rights, the obligations and the how to foresee potential problems. Keywords: legality, breach, obligations, duties Business Law Introduction Contract law is one of the major and most common branches of every day law.
They are: 1. Nature of contracts 2. Breach of contracts 3. Damages for the breach of contracts 4. Limitations. Nature of Contracts The first issue is about the nature of contracts that give rise to rights and responsibilities that enables one party to sue to recover damages in case the other party does not fulfil its part of the contract.
At a certain point of time, both of them perceived that they can operate more effectively if they work together as one single business unit based on a partnership contract. The underlying motive of Anita is to obtain profits through the business which had been shrinking owing to her health concerns.
The primary objectives of international laws are to maintain harmonious, balanced and economic relationships between the states. International business laws often serve as dispute resolution for international transactions. Different types of laws has been enacted and enforced in order to ensure smooth functioning of international business.
n According to the doctrine of precedent, Judges in the court are not expected to make decisions on a whim or feeling, but they have to follow previously decided and established legal cases so as to maintain uniformity in laws. Law of Contract and Law of Tort are the two major strands to English law.
The author gives recommendations all the partners to be agreed upon the terms of the partnership so that any future confusion or disagreement can be avoided. It is important to be kept in mind that it would be the state of defaulting law if there is no properly written partnership document is available.
The parking spots are, therefore, available on a first come first serve basis. Dabir travels to work by car but usually parks on the side street due to the limited parking spots. However, at the start of the induction week Dabir was early and was able to secure a parking
There are four elements in a contract. One is offer and acceptance. An offer is a definite promise to bind by the contract. For there to be a contract an offer must come first. That is there are certain provisions that you have to bring on board. It has to be accepted
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Coursework on topic Introduction to business law for FREE!