This paper is a brief article about the financial crisis which was being identified by the end of 2007 till the beginning of 2008. It was due to the ill-effects of the crisis that regulatory reforms were taken by US, UK and EU regions. This paper will thereby focus on the regulatory reforms adopted by these nations in the milieu of the 2008 financial crisis. Regulatory Framework of US Financial crisis is often termed as an unknown disturbance which leads to erosion of the total financial market of a country or a nation. By the end of 2007, with the identification of the financial crisis, US and other globalised economies become highly concerned about their survival as a global power. Most businesses ruined and were forecasted to lose approximately $ 2.7 trillion in this crisis (Rude, 2008). As a result, unemployment was at its highest stage. With this concern, the US government concentrated on keeping the banks and most significant businesses alive to overcome the unwanted danger. The crisis acted promptly drafting many important pieces of legislation or necessary changes and charting the post-crisis financial regulatory framework. But it was not an easy task; it comprised of numerous hurdles within it. The fundamental role in reforming the financial policies in the US was played by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and Financial Stability Board (FSB). They developed a DFA (Dodd-Frank Act), which is a framework of reforms to prevent the consequences arising due to such turmoil (Rude, 2008). The vital elements in reformation of US economy relates to the steps taken to develop a financially stable future as well as resizing of the international financial system, so that the need of the economy can be better served (Rude, 2008). It is worth mentioning that the decline of capital regulation in US was not only due to the ad hoc financial events but was also due to a direct consequence of ineffective design and substance of regulatory capital initiates. The detailed structure could not prevent the large financial institutions from failing. Apart from this, the unskilled leverage ratio turned out to be the most important constraint which ultimately proved beneficial (Rude, 2008). Requirement of capital was the most prevailing area of concern against bank failures after the crisis. Furthermore, the resolution procedures, another regulatory reform which was considered as a better process other than bankruptcy to deal with the problems of insolvency of financial institutions. This states that the framework of banks needed to be extended to other financial institutions in order to safeguard the large institutions in the financial services market. After the crisis, there was bail-out of many institutions due their inability to bear the failure of cross-border banks (Rude, 2008). This led to other regulatory reforms in the aftermath of the crisis, which resulted in dramatically increase of capital and liquidity buffers of the bank. The reforms enforced after the crisis mainly focuses on two perspectives, i.e. market-restricting approach and market-harnessing approach. The market-restricting approach mainly concentrates on deflating the commercial institutions along with the intention to limit the size of these institutions and reduce the investments in the market. On the other
Contemporary Issues in Finance 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 2 Introduction 3 Regulatory Framework of US 3 Regulatory Framework of UK 6 Regulatory Framework of EUs 7 Similarities or Differences Present In the Regulatory Reforms of US, UK and EU’s after Crisis 8 Conclusion 10 Introduction For hundreds of years, economic crisis has been described on the financial landscape…
Contextually, in terms of both auditors and clients, this letter primarily depicts the terms and the provisions of the engagement where the purpose of the engagement and the terms of the compensation for the auditors are appropriately mentioned. The purpose of this letter is to establish an engagement relationship amid Hammerson plc, a FTSE listed company and Loughran and Shrives Chartered Accountants, who would act as an auditor for the company.
A subject area of accounting and finance, financial regulation, involves preventing economic crises (International Monetary Fund 2009). Accounting deals with “identifying, measuring and communicating economic information to enable informed judgements and decisions by users of the information” (Collier 2003, p.
This paper attempts to explore this concern and discuss the contemporary issues by providing logical answers based on an analysis of the practical application of theories by scholars. Accounting is a legal framework which consists of laws, regulations and therefore accounting regulations is very important.
Whoever undertakes to audit the legal issues should have a clear target of evaluation and analysis. Should be bound to given cord of principals in his attempt to come up with the analysis and research (Guta, 2004, p.341). Some of the values expected of the professional accountants are integrity, having the objective in the work they undertake, practicing the independence during the execution of the duty, generating the confidence in the analysis they do, and also should show or should be a professional in the field of law.
A statutory auditor is a certified external auditor who has the statutory obligation to certify the accountability of the firm’s financial statements in accordance with professional auditing standards (European Commission 2011). In order to ensure stakeholder confidence regarding the transparency of the auditing process, it is necessary to promote the independence of statutory auditors.
Discuss the types of manager-stockholder conflict that exist and the various mechanisms to mitigate such problems, drawing insights from relevant theories and empirics from the literature.
This essay discusses the various theories pertaining to the separation of ownership and control in a modern corporation and how this will, through the transfer of responsibility to professional managers, inevitably lead to a stockholder-manager conflict.
With financial changes, there are structural changes in the financial market and with financial excesses, a hazardous financial environment has formed. There may be certain defects in the financial condition and structure of markets and there have been fluctuations in prices, bonds and currencies with turbulence in the financial markets.
d economic imbalances that compels the expert to question on the sustainability of the world economy as a whole (Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt and Honohan, 2009). Moreover, whereas financial unrest and financial deregulations are creating huge divergence among the major economies in the
14 pages (3500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com