Equity therefore demands fairness and justice in the awarding of contracts and the allocation of resources. In the case of LAWA, there had to be a tradeoff between equity and efficiency. To avoid the many millions of money that was incurred in the projects and to ensure that the projects are well done without compromising on quality, I believe that efficiency will be of more importance.
In contracting airport services, the government should put more emphasis on efficiency component because of various reasons (Nice, 2002). First, efficiency will ensure that the projects are undertaken at the lowest costs possible without undermining the need of quality services. Users of the airports will demand security when utilizing the services and proper service delivery rather. Secondly, efficiency will reduce the costs and expenditure that is made on the airport contract. The case of LAWA is one in which large public resources was used. The only way of reducing the burden to the public is by ensuring efficiency in the execution of the project. Moreover, efficiency will also ensure that the services provided at the airports are not affected. LAWA is where more that 2 million tons of cargo move annually making efficiency an important issue to equity (Emerson, 2000). Inefficiencies in the operation or delivery of contract could impair the movement of the cargo and this could cause more losses to the public. Just like the private sector, the public sector should move towards a situation of improving
on their quality of services rather than lag behind claiming that there is no profit motive in the delivery of public goods.
There are also political factors that should be addressed in the case of contracting at LAWA. Because of the high level of political dominance the management of the airport is likely to be affected by changes in [political interests which would therefore cause political interference on service delivery. Political dominance should be reduced in the contracting of services of the airport if the intended objectives are to be achieved. By depolarizing the process, decisions will be based on improvement of service delivery rather than affiliation to a political party. Politicians should only get involved in monitoring that the interest of the public is not violated during contract allocation. Political participation will also be important in boosting the confidence of the public on the transparency and accountability of their taxes that have been allocated to the project (Emerson, 2000). However, the level of political dominance must be kept at the lowest level to ensure that efficiency and cost reduction is attained in the airport management and service delivery. In addition, political appointees need to be scrutinized to determine their qualification and ability to perform the tasks. Legislative issues need to be considered in the allocation of the contracts. There needs to be adherence to the legislation before awarding on the big contracts to ensure that the actions are mot challenged in courts s this could deter or delay the delivery of the mandate. At the same time, legislation regarding the wage rates needs to be considered when determining the compensation to the workforce. The payments should be kept above the minimum wage rate to avoid battles and strikes that could halt the