Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc

Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc Research Paper example
College
Research Paper
Finance & Accounting
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 0
Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc. Student’s name Course title Instructor’s name Institution’s Name Date of Submission Analysis and discussion of the current effects of IFRS on the pension reporting for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo at 2009 year-end According to the Pension Plan Act of 2006 new standards were enacted and established in connection to the new methods of funding for the United States benefit pension plans…

Introduction

Consequent to this input, the plan is effectively funded to sustain total elasticity as laid down in the Pension Plan Act 2006. Generally, the fund was estimated to finance all the subsequent contributions in future from the operating activities. In accordance to the guidelines of IFRS the international pension plans of the company are funded in conformity to the domestic laws and the income tax guidelines. The company does not anticipate the contributions to the plans to be in effect in any near future. Following the enactment of the Pension Plan Act of 2006, no contributions are expected to be included in the schedule for funding the benefit pension plan. At the end of the financial year 2009, the estimated benefit requirement of the United States eligible pension plans was about $ 2.138 million and the reasonable value of the pension plan was about $ 1.975 million. The major part of this contribution was as a result of depressing effect that the previous financial crisis and financial mechanism’s vulnerability had on the company’s pension plan assets. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Horizontal and Vertical Financial Analysis - PepsiCo vs Coca-Cola
Income Statement Analysis on Horizontal Basis The major components of income statements are analyzed for both the companies in respect of cost of goods sold, operating income, income before taxes and finally net income. Cost of sales for PepsiCo is around 43% of the sales whereas the same for Coca-Cola is around 35% of the sales which is substantially lower than that of PepsiCo. In respect of…
Investment Decision: Coca-Cola Vs. Pepsi
Being multination, Pepsi and Coca-Cola operates in all the five continents of the world. Coca-Cola uses a marketing phrase “Coke side of life” (Byrne, 2010) while Pepsi on the other hand uses “Hot stuff” and “Pepsi is in sync” (Pepsi-Cola, 2006) in their internet sites to popularize their brands. As evidenced in the product market, beverage and soft drink products from these companies…
Account theory:The Coca-Cola Company
Unfortunately, despite efforts by philosophers and theorists, one can see that individuals and businesses have not been able to fulfill the ethical requirements that often result in unethical practices, disasters, public controversies, scandals, etc (Crane, 2007, pp. 19-24). In other words, business ethics seems a theoretical world, as such principles rarely exist in the real world. In response,…
Financial Analysis of Pepsi Cola Company FIN 534/Strayer University
48% of PepsiCo business is made up of Global Snacks like the Lay, Doritos, Cheetos, Tostitos, Sun Chips. and Global Nutrition products like the Quaker Oats, Tropicana Fruit Drinks, and Gatorade. The Global Beverages made up 52% of the entire business. 69% of the current PepsiCo Inc. are owned by Institutions like the Bank of New York Mellon Corp. which had been in business since 1784 and currently…
The Coca-Cola Company Financial Results Analysis
The first one being sales volume growth, structural changes, positive price/mix approximated at 3 percent and most important acquisition of the Great Plains Coca-Cola Bottling Company (“The Coca-Cola Company”, 2012). North American segment is a very sensitive market taking into consideration that the consumers have become highly health conscious owing to the escalating cases of obesity and…
Coca-Cola Company versus PepsiCo, Inc.
In 2009, the companies work under the 401k pension plan which provides insurance advantage on the medical requirements of the employees. In Coca-Cola the contributory plan is done by both the employer and the employees where the employer enjoys the benefit of taxation for their employees. The pension plan of PepsiCo is based on the willingness of the employees as the benefits are availed by both…
Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc
The two companies have set some pension plans that have had many effects on the companies’ level of investment and risk while also, it affects their levels of sale and production of products. These plans are aimed at benefiting their retired employees while each company uses a quite different approach from the other. The two companies have developed strong public relations across many nations…