Some of the reasons given for mergers relate to efficiency, market power, market discipline, expansion of operations and diversification (Andrade 2001). In terms of efficiency, emphasis is placed on economies of scale or other synergies that may result. Horizontal mergers often refer to economies of scale to be gained; however, economies of scale do not continue to infinity. There is always a point to which they apply, unless more advanced technology can extend it further then diminishing returns is likely may set in. 1.1 Background In the letter proposing the merger of equals between Xstrata (the bidding company) and Anglo-American (the targeted company) Xstrata (2009a June 17) stated that the combination was being considered for some time and such a merger is ‘a compelling, value-adding proposition for both sets of shareholders’ while combining a management team that would bring to the table ‘fresh and value-creating opportunities’ that may not be available otherwise. On June 21, 2009 Xstrata sent out a news release indicating that it notes Anglo American’s response. Xstrata (2009) argued that the merger of ‘two world-class companies would bring about many benefits. This proposed merger of equals which had no premium attached was expected to create a giant in the mining industry with a market valuation of ?40 billion (MacNamara 2009). Xstrata has grown through a number of acquisitions over the previous five years and wanted to generate economies of scale much like that enjoyed by BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto – which at that time were two of the largest companies in the mining industry. However, Anglo’s CEO Cynthia Carroll indicated that Anglo had superior assets to Xstrata and so the deal had no strategic merit and Anglo would be able to achieve its goals in relation to growth on its own. 1.2 Research Aims The aim of this research is to determine why Anglo American rejected Xstrata’s merger proposal. It looks at other mergers to determine whether it could have been successful if it was allowed to go through. The research hypothesis: H0: all mergers are beneficial to both parties The alternative hypothesis: H1: not all mergers are beneficial 2.0 Literature Review In order to gain knowledge of what work has been done in this area it is important to review what other researchers have done. This section of the article looks at the reasons that have been given for mergers and acquisitions. It looks at whether mergers are beneficial to both parties (the bidder and the target) and the findings in relation to failed mergers in an attempt to determine the reason for such failures. 2.1 Reasons for mergers Arnold (2008) indicates that the three main motives for mergers are synergy, bargain buying, managerial motives and third party motives. Some of these are similar to Andrade (2001) who looks at economies of scale and synergy, market power, market discipline and diversification. 2.1.1 Synergies Operating synergies have been given as one of the primary motive for mergers and acquisitions (Andrade 2001; Mukherjee et al 2004). It is defined as an approach which reinforces the competitiveness of a business by increasing the cash flows that would accrue to both companies independently. A number of expenses that are now paid by both companies would be reduced since only a single payment would be necessary once the companies have merged to become
The Failure of Merger of Equals Course: Name: Date: Abstract This research looks at the merger proposal made by Xstrata to Anglo American. The proposal was rejected as unacceptable. The article looks at some reasons for mergers and causes of failures. The aim of the study was to determine if t would have been successful had it been allowed to go through…
The understanding over the impact and influence of misevaluation in the failure of mergers and acquisitions has been presented in a logical and illustrative manner by covering wide arrays of information on the research topic. The introduction part of the research presented an overview of the research topic, aims and objectives and detailed description of mergers and acquisitions.
This research's aim is to assess the impacts of mergers on organizational performance and the wealth of the stakeholders in the communication sector in Europe and America. The research will employ both exploratory and descriptive research to gain in-depth and concise information in the research area.
The objective is to establish proof that EMH in its weak form is evident in currencies, since EMH was originally developed for the equities market. Investors and businessmen seek to avoid the risks of unexpected market fluctuations which tended to raise costs and increase the chances of losses, by discovering methods of forecasting future exchange rates.
Brief Background The global financial market is one of the highly affected areas of financial stability during the emergence of financial crisis which also delayed economic developments. It has been reported that Islamic banks are not greatly affected by global financial crisis unlike the tremendous losses incurred by conventional banks in a cross-country examination.
Why Do Mergers and Acquisitions Occur and Reasons for their Failure? Student’s Name: Sahil Khanna Student Number: Course Name: BSc Management Supervisor: Santi Furnari Date of Submission: Number of Words: 10,227 Executive Summary After gathering literature review and interviewing a couple of merger and acquisition experts, this study concludes that internal factors that contributes to a failed merger and acquisition includes: having an unclear or undefined organizational vision and mission, the presence of cultural clashes resulting to organizational miscommunication, and the lack of business integration.
This paper shall present the advantages and infirmities of the law and based on this dissection, this writer will make a conclusion on whether the Merger Law is good as it is or is it prejudicial warranting amendments to achieve the goals it set out at its inception.
Directors, being in a strategic position, always have an inside information about the strategic planning and direction of the company and can easily predict the future outlook of the company. In the past, several scandals have surfaced in which directors were allegedly involved in selling a great volume of the shares right before the shares took a downward plunge in the market.
This dissertation reveals that the research problem can be stated as follows: to submit a report with findings and recommendations of the financial impact upon Menzies Hotel of the takeover of Cambridgeshire Moat House. The dissertation is also followed by an explanation of the research methodology.
According to the report rationales reflect a more proactive and offensive thrust, such as diversification into new geographic markets and therapeutic areas, achieving scale and scope economies, developing competitive capabilities in R&D, and fostering disruptive change. There is the sense that these rationales focus on cost reduction and on revenue enhancement.
Empirical Modeling is an ongoing research method originally initiated in the early 1980s by Meurig Beynon at the University of Warwick. The early stages of EM research include ARCA, a definitive notation for interactive Cayley Diagrams. ARCA is a programming notation intended for interactive specification and manipulation of combinatorial graphs.
9 pages (2250 words)Dissertation
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Dissertation on topic Empirical Finance: The Failure of Merger of Equals for FREE!