The researcher states that when banks are operating at optimum efficiencies they are essential to the growth of the modern economy, facilitating spending and investments, allowing homes to be purchased, and businesses to expand. …
The paper tells that the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision (BCBS) was originally established in the 1970s to tackle the new challenges of banking across international boundaries. It became apparent that the failings and collapse of one country's banks was now being felt in other countries all over the world. It was obvious that intervention and prevention was necessary. In the 1980s, the United States Congress, pushed domestic regulatory agencies to set and enforce standards, including a fixed proportion of capital a bank must hold, or capital adequacy. This is how the Basel Accords began. The accords have been adapted and expanded in attempts to meet needs and to speak to aspects that previous version of the accords may not have addressed sufficiently. In order to understand the Basel Accords better it is useful to review them individually in order to better compare and contrast the variations. The BCBS determined that bank capital would be organized into 2 separate tiers. Tier 1focuses on the higher-quality capital, those that represents items of the lowest priority of repayment and easiest to absorb when lost. Most of Tier 1 involves “core” capital, or common equity, which arises from actual ownership in the bank, like common stock, undivided profits, and surplus monies. Tier 2, also called supplementary capital, include certain reserves, and term debt. The capital under Tier 2 can be divided into 2 more sublevels; the upper focuses on maintaining characteristics of being continuous, like preferred capital, and equity. The lower level, is the least costly for banks to issue because it pertains to debts with a time of maturity of at least 10 years.(Eubanks, 2010) Basel I was the first attempt made to establish a standard of regulating international banking and it came under a great deal of criticism. Opponents felt that the Basel I Accord approach to “risk-weighing assets.” They claimed that this system is too broad and lacks the finite specialization to address all of the unique risks that apply to the differing assets held by the bank. As a response the BCBS released a revision to the accord called the “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: Revised Framework,” which is, also, known as Basel II.(Larson, 2011) Basel II Basel II differs from Basel I in a distinct way. It introduced a section of “Pillars,” which intended to rectify the capital adequacy issues with Basel I. Pillar 1, specifically, deals with the procedures of calculating the required capital within banking organizations. This accord will determine risk potential based upon the totality of their credit risk, market risks, and operational risks. Pillar 2, ideally, was placed to increase, both, accountability and transparency with the banking system. Pillar 3 works to require banking institutions to disclose risk exposures, allowing for better assessment of the needed safety to help create a ...
Cite this document
(“Basel Accord Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/89204-basel-accord
(Basel Accord Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Basel Accord Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/finance-accounting/89204-basel-accord.
Overview Basel II was launched in order to make the financial system more risk sensitive and to improve the capabilities of the financial institutions to actually improve their robustness and ability to cope with the extreme situations. However, the current economic crisis has put a big question mark over the ability of the Basel II framework to put an effective check over the behavior and practices of the financial institutions.
The Basel II accord aimed at implementing laid down guidelines while in response to financial crisis in the world, Basel III accord was formulated to address the issue. The Basel agreements are some of the most significant accords in modern international finance.
Their effective functioning is crucial owing to the support they provide to the economic growth of a particular region. In order to safeguard the significance of these financial institutions, regulating authorities have incepted the frameworks of Basel accord comprising of Basel I, II and three (Hai, Minhaj, & Ahmed n.d.).
et of rules that could be acceptable to all as the multitude of nations also represent a multitude of conditions that could make a guideline acceptable for some but detrimental to others. Nevertheless, it doesn’t stop us from trying to establish one.
One such example of an
The researcher of this accurate essay mostly focuses on the discussion of the international banking system and analyzing the issue of basel agreements impact. The analysis is built due the fact that Basel agreements are some of the most significant accords in modern international finance.
plementing laid down guidelines while in response to financial crisis in the world, Basel III accord was formulated to address the issue of financial crisis. The Basel agreements are some of the most significant accords in modern international finance. These accords were drafted