FGM and Vulvas With a Difference - Coursework Example

Female Genital Mutilation With reference to the article “Vulvas with a difference” by Faith Wilding, FGM has ended up being modernized under some contemporary names in the name of demulsifying women’s’ sexuality unlike with reference to the World Health Organization, Female Genital Mutilation is an exercise profoundly rooted in custom which is accomplished in more than twenty eight African nations as well as in selected states in Asia and parts of the Middle East. It is anticipated that there are at contemporary 130 million women and young girls who have gone through female genital mutilation.

Over 90% of females residing in Somalia, Eritrea and the Sudan have been exposed to this inhumane practice. (Toubia & Susan 2009) There are at present four categories of Female Genital Mutilation: Type I – removal of the prepuce, with or short of elimination of part or the complete clitoris. Type II – removal of the clitoris with fractional or total removal of the labia minora. Type III – removal of portion or all of the exterior genitalia and hemming/thinning of the vaginal passage (infibulation).

Type IV – perforating, piercing or slitting of the clitoris and the labia; elongating of the clitoris and the labia; sealing by smoldering the clitoris and adjacent tissues; scraping off tissues neighboring the vaginal opening or whole removal of the vagina; institution of eroding elements or parsleys into the vagina to bring about hemorrhage or for the tenacity of narrowing or contracting it; alongside any other process that is categorized under the explanations mentioned above. (Toubia & Susan 2009) The Modern approach of FGM has made many women go crazy about their sexual organs in the belief that they are modernizing their vaginas and discovering new and elaborate ways of making their sexual organs unique.

Websites like “Designer Vagina” are offering women services and cosmetic surgeries like vaginal constriction and labiaplasty. All this are just FGM albeit in a more contemporary manner. The practice may be done at any time during the lifespan of the victim, from initial stages of life to the period which the victim is getting married or during the death of the husband depending on the local traditions, but happens most over and over again during puberty stage. The exercise is most commonly executed by inexperienced midwives by use of tools like the kitchen knives, glass shards or razor blades.

The impression of the archaic form of FGM on the well-being of the individual is reliant on the magnitude and type of method, the expertise of the practitioner, the hygiene levels of the tools and the settings of the operation, and the physical situation of the lady in question. This is unlike in the present times whereby the medical levels are of high standards and the operation tools and procedures are developed to ensure the patient’s safety is paramount. The instant or interim health problems communal to all forms of FGM are pain and blood outflow.

Enduring complications theoretically include struggle in transient of urine and infections like the urinary tract infection, pubic infections, and sterility amongst others. The psychosomatic effects of FGM are repeatedly understated and bottled-up within the reception of social standards. In the olden times, FGM is every so often done out of tradition or ethnic conformism and is thought to reserve virginity, improve femaleness and marriageability, smudge ethnic limits increase cleanliness, aesthetics, productiveness, and sexual happiness for the spouse unlike in the present times whereby it is done out of a person’s own willingness to go have their vaginas restructured and made to believe it is the in thing and most contemporary trend.

Work CitedToubia, Nahid, and Susan Izett. Female Genital Mutilation: An Overview. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009. Print.http://www.obn.org/reading_room/writings/html/vulvas.html