Religious Critiques about Gay Marriage - Annotated Bibliography Example

Religious Critiques about Gay Marriage Introduction The two articles, A Catholic Defense of Same-Sex Marriage and ‘Marriage is sacred’: The religious right’s arguments against ‘gay marriage’ in Australia offer an in-depth and detailed analysis of gay marriages in the society. The authors of the two articles strive to maintain objectivity by citing their works in order to validate the claims they make. Gay marriages among other forms of homosexuality remain contentious issues in the society with various people holding divergent views.

The two articles portray the level of diversity. The authors of the two articles argue their respective cases systematically with the view to persuading their audiences. As such, the two articles offer good arguments on religious critiques on gay marriages. The first article for example analyses the Catholic’s viewpoint on the issue. The article develops systematic arguments that attempt to validate Catholic’s objection to gay marriages. The author outline a number of factors and reasons as proposed by the doctrines of the Catholic Church.

The same is the case with the second article in which the author furthers the argument on religious objection to same sex marriages. The author provides reliable evidence, which include in text citations to validate his claims. He eventually makes a reliable conclusion by marrying his facts to his thoughts as he showed in the article’s thesis statement. Maguire, Daniel. C. A Catholic Defense of Same-Sex Marriage. The Religious Consultation, April 20, 2006. Internet resource.Professor Daniel Maguire ventures into the discussion by defending same-sex marriages.

He provides a history of same-sex unions explaining that both the society and the church had once accepted such unions. He further borrows immense citations from the Acts of the Apostles to justify his belief about same-sex unions. The professor attempts to discuss numerous reasons that various people have given in their objections to same-sex unions. After exhausting such reasons, he concludes by referring to the Bible, Christian’s holy book to validate his arguments. The professor maintains that homosexuality is not a sin but discriminating against homosexuals is a sin.

He, therefore, calls on Christians to abhor from discriminating homosexuals and instead accept them. However, the article appears sensational with the author striving to justify his feelings and opinions about the topical issues. He does not seek any third party indulgence in order to develop a holistic view of the issue. Edwards, Jane. ‘Marriage is sacred’: The religious right’s arguments against ‘gay marriage’ in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, May–June 2007; 9(3): 247–261. Print.The author analyses the sacred nature of marriages, an argument used in Australia by a number of lobbyists in the country to justify a government legislation that prohibited gay marriages.

The author uses a number of literature materials in his analysis of the sacred and profane nature of marriage as proposed by right-wing Christians. He analyzes various quotes and statements by various professionals. He borrows from existing literatures thereby developing an objective article. Through his systematic analysis of the arguments and opinions of such groups, the author determines that the arguments strive to protect masculine authority. Such arguments, therefore, are in exercises of the ideological power.

The author concludes by presenting the sacred and inviolate nature of heterosexual marriages while proving that the portrayal of homosexual marriages as profane is a way of safeguarding the epistemological order often associated with the masculine authority in the Australian society. However, the article is lengthy with the author often repeating himself. Works citedEdwards, Jane. ‘Marriage is sacred’: The religious right’s arguments against ‘gay marriage’ in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, May–June 2007; 9(3): 247–261. Print.Maguire, Daniel. C. A Catholic Defense of Same Sex Marriage.

The Religious Consultation, April 20, 2006. Internet resource.