The design of the study was broadly based on a case analysis, where the necessary details were researched and compared.
A qualitative design was used by the investigators to obtain results after comparisons were made. This design technique was quite useful in helping the respondents to freely express their thoughts and emotions. In addition to this, the first project showed specific themes that can be used in the further investigation of this project (Anderson et al. 2006).
Out of the different approaches for the study, the approach used for the research in Bristol was that of a purposive, stratified approach, where a mixed group of people, involving residents and professionals actively participated. The involvement of people is normally classified into different levels, namely low, medium, and high, respectively. The low level is the type wherein people do not have a direct input in the planning process. Medium level, on the other hand, comprises of the involvement of people who have been present during some of the meetings. Lastly, the high level of involvement mostly comprise of people who have been actively present during meetings, and have given their inputs regarding pertinent manners (Anderson et al. 2006).
The interviewees from Bristol were people who came from different backgrounds, different age groups, gender, and different experiences from work. The kind of involvement each interviewee had in relation to work was also taken into consideration (Anderson et al. 2006).
Three local residents comprised of the WSM public focus group. The said group of professionals comprised of six participants, which included the practice manager, a general practitioner, the building administrator, the manager of the Healthy Living Center, and two curates.
The interviews were recorded transcribed and then sent for further analysis. The data that was collected was studied and compared accordingly. The transcriptions produced were then read and identified by the researchers, before being sent for discussion. The themes and codes that were associated with the latter, had been double checked for further verification. As the themes were finalized, these were organized accordingly to show the different characteristics of involvement in the public (Anderson et al. 2006).
Results of the Study
For this study, the three main themes were identified. These include power, process, and partnership.
This theme was considered to be critical in terms of its relationship and partnership with people. This may be due to the fact that people are able to convey their messages across even in the presence of traditional boundaries.
For the interviewees, the main goal was to show that the involvement of the locals was present in their development. The interviewees wanted to convey that their location and origins were flexible and accessible. Furthermore, it was also evident that the interviewees were directive and remote.
From the interviews conducted, it became evident that there were those people who became more involved than the others even at the start of the Most of the people showed dynamic personalities, especially in showing their case, which in turn became highly