Pharmacy - State laws pertaining to prescriptions - Essay Example

There are distinct regulations that govern receiving electronic prescriptions in the of Minnesota. It is mandatory for a pharmacist receiving a transferred e-prescription to create electronic documentation for the prescription that should contain the in receipt pharmacist’s name and all of the details reassigned with the prescription which includes; the exact date of the original administration (Eiland & Ginsburg, 2011). It should also include the amount of fill up that remain and the date(s) and locality of earlier refills, the reassigning pharmacys details and prescription numeral for each provision.

It should also include details of the previous pharmacy that originally wrote down the prescription if different (CCH Incorporated & United States, 2004).The pharmacy must maintain prescription paperwork for a period of two years from when the prescription was first refilled. Different pharmacies that are accessing the similar prescription documentation by electronic means must suit all information necessities of a manual form for prescription reassignment. The process of allowing the reassignment of prescription details for fill up reasons is allowable only if acceptable under the present State law (Merrills & Fisher, 2006).

There are also electronic signature regulations in Minnesota. One is on the consistent electronic dealings that address the subject of the lawful acceptability of electronic files created in a dependable way (Merrills & Fisher, 2006). Another regulation act defines an electronic signature in a unique manner in conditions of digital signature by means of communal key communications technology.  There is also an act on health insurance portability, which is chiefly concerned with non-refutation.

This provides a guarantee of the source of information, so that the dispatcher cannot refute having sent a message and the recipient cannot refuse to have received it. This averts either individual from amending or infringement of a lawful association unilaterally (Merrills & Fisher, 2006). ReferencesCCH Incorporated. & United States. (2004). Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003: Law and explanation. Chicago: CCH Inc.Eiland, L. S. & Ginsburg, D. B. (2011). Pharmprep: ASHPs NAPLEX review.

Bethesda, Md: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.Merrills, J. & Fisher, J. (2006). Pharmacy law and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.