Chlamydia Trachomatis Infections among Ethnic Group Ages 14-24 in Miami - Thesis Example

My past involvement in research has a rich experience in conducting academic reviews, facing and embracing challenges and appreciating breakthroughs. The development of new knowledge from research on a dissertation topic has been one of the motivating agents in conducting a literature review as it develops an opinion on expected results as well as facilitates the identification of the problem statement. The intrinsic motivational factors that drive me towards developing a strong ground for dissertation, has therefore made my experience in academic reviews pleasant. The review part of a dissertation however has a variety of challenges and barriers. Its scope is for example wide and calls for immense care in order to meet its purpose. An academic review that does not narrow down to a problem for which the dissertation is being undertaken or one that does not identify new premises for developments, for example, falls short of expectations. Failure to guide research methodology is also an identified challenge in conducting academic reviews (Randolph, 2009).

Procedural and analytical inefficiencies are another set of challenges that face academic review in dissertations. With its process that begins with the determination of the problem followed by research into existing data and a final review of the retrieved information for presentation, conducting a review without a clearly identified problem leads to the ambiguity that may not form a strong basis for a dissertation. Other major barriers to the stage involve inadequacy of resources for conducting the review as well as political and legal factors. This is because existing literature may be copy-written to induce legal and financial considerations. Political influence may similarly influence access to literature as well as the researcher’s environment to hinder the review process (Randolph, 2009; Rudestam and Newton, 2007). Poor documentation of the reviewed information, due to the wide scope of software application, is also a notable barrier to the academic review process (Career, n.d.).

My work in the past week

The past week has majorly been dedicated to developing short-term, current term, objectives of the research, and timeline and outline of the research. The dissertation’s objectives for the term and the timeline were based on its outline and the available period for completion. My objectives for the term include completion of the dissertation’s introduction, literature review and methodology sections that were subsequently scheduled for the current term.

Response to the scholarly writing web

I concur with the site’s provision for proper recognition of a source in professional writing (Writingcenter, 2012).