Forensic Pathology Case Study: Skeletal Remains - Assignment Example

Human Remains Investigation Sometimes it becomes difficult to know exactly what human remains are. When someone burns into ashes, it is impossible to tell exactly whose ashes are and which part of the body it is. In some accidents, when someone is cut into pieces, it also becomes difficult to differentiate the body parts. It is important to do some investigation and know exactly what the remains are and also who was the person involved. Sometimes, the investigation can also assist to know what caused the incidence (Spitz, 2006).

In the given case where human remains are found in the firm and taken to the morgue. The results that are revealed from the examination in my consultation with a forensic anthologist and forensic deontologist can indicate to the following;The head which is relatively large with prominent forehead indicates that it is a male skull. According to me, the person that was involved in the incident was a man. The normal soft tissue could be caused by poor dental hygiene, medications, systemic diseases and hormonal changes.

This indicates to me that the diseased had some dental problems and given the fact that the teeth are in good repair with a root canal therapy reveals that the individual has had dental work in the past, and therefore, should have dental records to assist in the identification of the deceased (Itabashi, 2007).The yellowish skull could have been contributed by; remote chronic tetracycline treatment, Diabetes, Mino cyclone treatment. This indicates to me that the diseased suffered from either of the above diseases.

The pelvis with a wide inlet is an indication of a female pelvis. This tells me that the people involved were not one but there was also a lady or a woman involved in the incident. The five adult radii indicate that the human remains are of three adults as every human being has a minimum of two radii. There the people involved in the incident were three adults. The deciduous second molar represents a primary tooth that would have come from a child. Usually, of the primary second molar occurs between 10-12 years of age.

So we can conclude that the tooth that came from a child anywhere from approximately 2-12 years of age. (Itabashi, 2007)According to the above observations, I can conclude that the human remains found in the farm are of three adults and possibly with one child. The child was between two and twelve years old. Maybe he had followed his mother when the incidence happened. One of the adult was a man who had dental problems and he had attempted to seek medication from a specialist. The other two were ladies.

From the yellowish skull, it is possible that among the diseased, one of them had suffered from either remote chronic tetracycline treatment, Diabetes or Mino cyclone treatment. (Spitz, 2006) ReferencesItabashi, H. H,Andrews, J. M., Tomiyash, U., Erlich, S. S., & Sathyavagiswarabn, L. (2007). Forensic neuropathology: A practical review of the fundamentals. Burlington, MA: Academic Press/Elsevier. Spitz, W. U. (2006). Medico legal investigation of death: Guidelines for the application of pathology to crime investigation (4th Ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C.

Thomas Publisher, Ltd.