Benefits and Health Risks Associated with Energy giving Drinks - Essay Example

The Possible Benefits and Health Risks associated with Energy giving Drinks Abstract Energy giving drinks are two different products used for differently purposes; hence the terms should not be used interchangeably (Brown, 2013). The primary objective of this research or report is to define the ingredients of energy drinks, categorize the possible benefits and effects that come along with this drinks, especially ‘Monster and Redbull’. Secondary objectives are to discourage people from using these drinks as the results can be fatal and of a high percentage compared to the possible benefit that accrues from the drinks. Yes, they are good for people but very dangerous. Another secondary reason for this report is to understand the reasons why these drinks are used widely by youths or, in other words, and the consumption rate is widespread in youths (Aronson, 2011). A keen study, review and analysis of the literature reveal that other stimulant and caffeine substances enclosed in these drinks has a positive and direct effect on the users too. The intended impact of energy drinks is to improve performance and provide sustenance, endurance, and concentration. Almost every Manufacturer pitches their products in work fields that require sustained alertness. But these drinks too have got no position in the adolescents and children’s diet (American Academy of Pediatrics, 20110). In addition, frequent or extreme intake of caloric energy drinks can largely enhance the risk for obesity or overweight adolescents and children’s. Discussion regarding educating the ‘users; of this drinks on how to use it appropriately, either by people who participates regularly in endurance or high-intensity of vigorous physical activity is aim of the report (Brown, 2013). Introduction Energy drinks are grouped among beverages containing modest to relatively high levels of caffeine concentration, which gives a range of 50–505 mg caffeine/serving; 2.5–35.7 mg caffeine/oz, in comparison with other caffeinated beverages such as 6-ounce cup of coffee that range 77–150 mg; 12.8–25 mg caffeine/oz. In other words, energy “shots” are low-volume that is, 1–2 oz beverages and hence, records even a higher percentage in caffeine concentration more than other energy drinks (orange 100–350 mg; 90–171 mg caffeine/ oz (Maughan, 2001). The stimulants in these drinks include: caffeine that is marketed as a provider of mental and physical stimulation (Brown, 2012). The energy drinks sometimes may or may not be carbonated though some; may also contain sugar or other sweeteners, amino acids, and herbal extracts. They are a subset or a division of the bigger group of energy products that includes gels and bars, and distinct from drinks which are advertised to improve and enhance any performance (Millward, 2003). Evidence regarding the effects of ‘energy drinks’ consumption on health is inconclusive. The majority of published literature to date has reviewed the potential risks and benefits of individual ingredients of ‘ED’ but none has evaluated the combined synergistic effect of the whole ‘ED’.6,10,18,21 This is important as individuals consume entire beverages and not just individual ingredients. The primary aim of this review was purposed to give a systematic examine the literature in order to determine the possible benefits and health effects associated with consumption of whole ‘EDs’ in humans. Most of the end results assisted in informing the public of the potential advantages and effects of this drinks and evidence-based dietary recommendations as to the safe consumption of ‘EDs’ (Brown, 2012). Possible benefits of energy drinks A thousand years 'millennium' that have elapsed has brought in a wave of synthetic, caffeinated high-energy drinks mainly targeting the youth market. For the past ten years, the intake of caffeinated beverages intended to “energies”, has seen a significantly increased. Energy giving drinks recently were shown to consist of 20% of the total convenience accumulate in the beverage market, with” V” and “Red Bull “accounting for more than 97% of sales industry. Progressively more, toxicity from caffeine overdose is consistently reported to poisons centers and hospitals (Jeukendrup & Gleeson, 2010). The principal active constituents of energy drinks include Guarani extract, Ginseng, Taurine and varying amounts of caffeine. Vitamins, carbohydrates, and Additional amino acids, usually complete the list of purportedly beneficial ingredients. The deliberate effects of energy drinks are to give concentration, endurance, sustenance and improve performance. Manufacturers pitch their product to students, athletes and people that are in professions requiring continued alertness. These drinks can also be a consumed during dance parties that require constant energy for lengthened activities. With this kind of a set-up, energy drinks can also be combined with alcohol along with recreation drugs such as ecstasy or other amphetamines (Jeukendrup & Gleeson, 2010). Possible side effects of energy drinks The risk of the miscarriage Studies trying to put open effects of energy drinks on miscarriage have been diverse. A recent study of over 1,000 pregnant women got that those who took more than 250 mg of energy drinks in a day (from either coffee, tea, soda or even hot chocolate) were almost twice as probable to have a miscarriage contrasted with pregnant women who don’t take the drinks. Nevertheless, a study in 2008 found no connection between caffeine use (in spite of the quantity) and the danger of miscarriage at 21 weeks of the pregnancy. With pregnant women, high energy drink ingestion is associated with danger of stillbirths, small-for-gestational-age infants, and late miscarriages (Plamondon, (n.d.)). An increased risk of energy drinks combined with alcohol Even though energy drink is a stimulant, research recommend that it does not "offset" the sedating consequence of alcohol. There is worry that mixing alcohol as well as energy drinks may perhaps keep individuals awake for a longer. This allows them to take more alcohol than they normally would. When using a mixture of energy drinks and alcohol, one may not feel the result and symptoms of alcohol intoxication. This undoubtedly increases the possibility of there being an accident that is alcohol-related. Indeed, a recent survey of college students found that in comparison to those who consumed alcohol without using the energy drinks, students who drank a mixture of alcohol with energy drinks had a significantly a high prevalence of alcohol-related consequences that includes: taking advantage of another student or being taken advantage of sexually, being hurt or injured or riding in an automobile with a driver under the influence of alcohol. In addition, mixing energy drinks with alcohol was related to increased heavy episodic drinking and episodes of weekly drunkenness (Aronson, 2011). The recent beginning of pre-mixed caffeine alcohol combination drinks may worsen these problems. And also, the high sugar content available in caffeinated energy drinks is comparable to other soft drinks and also contributes a person contracting the obesity (Griffiths, et al, 2009). Heart problems Energy drinks such as caffeine as well as other compounds in energy drinks usually increase heart rate as well as blood pressure. Energy drinks normally cause heart cells to discharge calcium, which may influence heartbeat. This leads to arrhythmia. The drinks may perhaps also interrupt the normal stability of salts in the human body that has been connected to arrhythmia too. Conclusion In conclusion, yes, as more as people should prefer to consume energy giving drinks on different occasions, the side effect of these drinks is alarming. Consumption of high caffeine content energy drinks has increased markedly in recent years mainly targeting the young generation. Regulations or Parameter is guiding the energy giving drinks that include, labeling, health warnings and content has differed across countries (Aronson, 2011). United States that is also the largest market for these products has the laxest regulatory system. The absence regulatory oversee this energy giving drinks market, has resulted in aggressive and rapid marketing of energy drinks that primarily is toward young males, for psycho activeness, performance-enhancing and stimulant drug effect. Therefore, persistent public health awareness concerning high levels of caffeine consumption, no matter what the beverage source, in sensitive persons, is undoubtedly warranted (Watson WA, Litovitz TL, et al., 2004). References American Academy of Pediatrics, (2011), Sports Drinks and Energy Drinks for Children and Adolescents: Are They Appropriate? Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. 127(6) Aronson, J. (2011). Side effects of the drugs yearly survey of the new data and trends in the adverse drug reactions. Oxford: Elsevier. Brown, J, (2012). Energy Drinks: health risks and toxicity. MJA Brown, J. (2013). Nutrition now (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth. Dasgupta, A. (2011). The science of drinking: How alcohol affects your body and mind. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. Griffiths, R, et al, (2009), Caffeine Energy Drinks; A Growing Problem. National Institute of Health. Jeukendrup, A., & Gleeson, M. (2010). Sport nutrition: An introduction to energy production and performance (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Maughan, R. (2001). Sports Drinks: Basic Science and Practical Aspects. Nutrition in Exercise and Sports Series. CRC Press. Millward D, (2003). An adaptive metabolic demand model for protein and amino acid requirements.Br J Nutr; 90(2):249 –260 Mosley, M., & Spencer, M. (n.d.). The fast diet: Lose weight, stay healthy, and live longer with the simple secret of intermittent fasting. Plamondon, L. (n.d.). Energy drinks: Threatening or commonplace? an update ([CEL version]. ed.). Royston, A. (2000). Eat well. Des Plaines, Ill.: Heinemann Library. Stanwell, P, (2005). What are the health implications associated with the consumption of energy drinks? A systematic review. Nutrition Reviews. 71(3) Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Rodgers GC, et al., (2004), Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers toxic exposure surveillance system. Am J Emerg Med.2005;23(5):589–666 Read More