Analysis of the Articles about the Issue of Smoking - Assignment Example

Some other chosen movies dated back to 2000. 36% of the sample had tried smoking. 38% of the Whites, 41% of Hispanics, and 32% of the Blacks in the sample reported having tried smoking. The probability of trying to smoke rose with exposure to movie smoking for Whites and Hispanics but not Black teens. An increase in exposure to movie smoking directly led to an increase in the percentile of the probability of smoking among White and Hispanic adolescents. Socio-economic status also affected smoking habits in the test sample.

The researchers concluded that the black teenagers failed to respond to the predominantly White and affluent character smoking in the movie. The affluent White youth identified with these characters and as such their behavior was influenced. The research did not have experimental designs and as such the interpretation of the Black teenagers could not be conclusively confirmed. The research in my opinion is casual assuming and nonscientific. The researchers have used assumption as a paradigm for the conclusion and attest that the noted trend of the Black test subjects could not be confirmed as it was not based on experimental designs.

The researchers seem to have a bias in approach as they try to collate observation and behavior on ethnicity and color. Some Black teenagers borrow heavily from the white characters they follow fanatically. Logically, therefore, it is vague of them to report that there were 0% of Blacks who could have tried smoking as a result of movie smoking susceptibility. The research should have experimental designs put in place to provide scientifically viable results that could be used to draw a conclusive hypothesis.

There could be truth in the research but the mode of research and tabulation of the results failed the process. A deeper outlook, weighted methodology, and professional tabulation should be used in a repeat of the same Sargent, James et al., Ethnic Differences in Susceptibility To Movie Smoking, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, The second paper delve into mental health and trauma. It tries to collate exposure to disturbing events and extreme life events to mental health.

According to the paper, the more adversity one faces, the worse the outcome of an individual’s mental health. The adversity could also be a source of resilience resulting in better mental health and well-being. The paper is drawn from a longitudinal study of over the years on a national sample of people who have faced traumatizing situations. Those among the sampled that had little history of adversity reported better mental health than those with a high history. People who had no history of adversity whatsoever had poor mental health The paper did well to detail that people with no adversity history had poor mental health comparatively.

It also gave real-time research results on a national wide scope. It however put cross the obvious in an obvious way. The paper should have had case studies to support the arguments as well as deal with the issue of “why” and not “what”.