The Gulf War Issues - Essay Example

History and Political Science The Gulf War Gulf war has been the main general terminology for one of the worst clashes that people living in Europe and North America .The gulf war started in 1990, when Iraq invaded Kuwait in the grounds that Kuwait possessed a very quire behavior, such as not valuing an agreement on their established quotas as agreed between the two nations. America and United Nations organization retaliated on the attack and immediately imposed economic sanctions on the country of Iraq. America completely rejected any form of negotiations that Iraq had proposed in order to leave Kuwait, among the demand made by Iraq being that America should destroy both Israel’s and Iraq’s lethal weapons. After easily conquering Kuwait, Iraq began verbal attacks on Saudi Arabia, which forced the rest of the world to take a stern action against the stubborn Iraq nation. When Iraq defied all the warnings to leave Kuwait, a military action was the only remaining solution to cub that problem. The western world in collaboration with other wealthy nations contributed funds and security forces to fight Iraq. The gulf war negatively affected the economies of almost all nations, with the worst hit being the developing nations and it altered global democracy. The gulf war had a great negative effect on the world economy that was under pressure in recovering from the Second World War was threatened once again. Oil prices escalated at a great deal since Middle East countries are the major world oil producers because the war had interrupted oil mining and the exportation processes. The oil supply in Middle East countries reduced greatly up to a point where it could not meet global energy demands. Due to the scarcity of oil from major producers, the few Non- OPEC oil producing countries took advantage and hiked their oil prices and the customers did not have a choice but to dig deeper into their pockets. Those prices affected the budgets of various countries since a portion of money that had been set aside for other national projects had to be used to meet the rising cost of oil (Schwab 340). After the problem persisted for a long time, the global economy had taken a recession direction. Many developed nations opted to exploit on other sources of energy to meet their energy demands. Those unplanned new projects hampered development in those nations due to the increased expenditures that those countries did not anticipate. The cost of production of energy rose at an alarming rate, and the result was that the production cost of goods also rose. The increased cost of production further worsened the world economic status since most industries had reduced their production capabilities and they faced weaker purchasing powers. Most ended up in retrenching a good number of their workers thus increasing the rate of unemployment and overdependence at the same time. Annual revenues that governments earned from those companies reduced drastically forcing them to reduce funding the national projects and development of infrastructures. Free trade markets experienced acute shortages of various goods whose prices had also risen; the nations that relied on these products had to spend more to get them (Schwab 342). Since many sovereign states had cut down on the cost of development, it implied that they produced fewer goods to trade and thus they earned less from foreign exchange markets and in local trades. The poverty levels pushed up due to the increased rate of unemployment, thus posing a great threat to the nationals’ securities since a considerable number of people had turned into theft and other criminal acts to earn their daily bread (Cashman & Robinson 11). The developing states faced the worst economic crisis as compared to the developed countries primarily because those nations heavily depended on the imported goods from their developed neighbors (Costigan & Perry 301). The oil crisis forced those developed states to use more money from their budgets and they had to stall some of their projects to meet the high cost of necessary products. The idea of halting some projects by the developing nations reduced their products, which they released to the free trade markets thus weakening their local exchange currencies. The energy crisis hit developing countries because unlike their developed counterparts, they did not have capacity to install new projects to diversify on to the new sources of energy to meet their demands. A great number of employees lost their jobs to the rising cost of production experienced by the infant industries in the developing countries. On the wake of continued energy crisis many small scale and middle class industries did not have any other options but to shut down when they started realizing a lot of losses (Costigan & Perry 303). As a result, the revenues of those nations reduced up to a point where some of the states considered themselves to be bankrupt. The poverty levels and high rates of over dependence in those nations grew rapidly to a point where most of the citizens could not afford to sustain their livelihoods. A considerably great number of people died due to starvation and health related issues due to lack of access to health facilities and food. When the financial problems became severe and unbearable in the third world countries, they had to seek assistance from the wealthy nations to upkeep their budgets and to save the lives of their citizens. The wealthy states reciprocated and the lend funds to the developing nations inform of loans and grants of which the recipients found it as a good option to save their economies which were on a sharp decline. The first world states also started donating food to the poor people living in the world countries. The third world nations used the loans to fund essential national infrastructures and the remainder would support development projects (Macarthur 101). The gulf war led many developing countries into severe tribulations which most of them have not yet recovered currently, because they have heavy financial debts, which they have never cleared. The Gulf war had paralysed almost all the economic activities forcing the young and the ill established entrepreneurs to exit the business world. Since World War II, democracy had become a theme of past nations which strictly observed equality and freedom of their citizens, and respect for the other nations. When the world was struggling to fix all the mess and embrace democracy, it was hurt by the unexpected gulf war which destroyed the world peace.The gulf war killed the social democracy among various governments around the world and interrupted the creation of political policies would help to cub the problem in the wake of occurrence of other similar crisis. Those policies focused on reviving the global markets strategies to reconstruct the fallen economies after Second World War. The after math of was rendered most developing nation lack a privilege to enjoy social justices which is a significant component of social democracy (Cashman & Robinson 13). The era of gulf war denied many people human rights such as, the right to access education, which many could not afford due to high level of poverty that faced many developing nations. Education is the only formal way where people could learn about democracy and promote serenity. The internal human rights too, did not survive violation since most people suffered and died from hunger and diseases, a problem, which could not exist, if the minority selfish and violent members of the society could have applied democracy before violence (Macarthur 101). Additionally, effective universal communication that carries the democratic doctrines of equality, commands, and societal and national plans had faded in the mindset of many people during that period. This resulted in many states to fail to obtain the height of well-integrated oneness and power necessary for democratic nation to look into national affairs. The war also denied people other core objectives of democracy such as, ultimate security, independence, and prosperity by abusing the basic rights of humans and freedom of mobility across the world. A profound security is key pillar to exploration of matters across the world in order to enhance democratic awareness and peace at any home. It also discouraged lack of dedication to democracy, and destroyed the fundamental principles to maintain a sound public figure (Geis, Harald & Niklas 54). The media coverage of the gulf war also negatively affected the world diplomacy, which it entails three categories such as virtual, people and public diplomacy. The governments should have forbidden the media on coverage of the gulf war because that lengthened the reconciliation process after the war. The governments should have restricted their local media groups on coverage of intercontinental dealings. Moreover, the war affected world transportation, thus violating freedom of movement, and people felt as if they were prisoners (Geis, Harald & Niklas 55). Conclusively, the gulf war occurred when r Iraq invaded Kuwait on the grounds that, Kuwait defied they orders of their agreement of quotas. The rest of the world rallied behind Kuwait and saved the nation from a violent invested Iraq nation. The war affected the world economy negatively and most nations faced a recession in their budgets leading to deficiencies in their financing.oil, which was the main source of energy, affected the global economies due to its shortage and this forced countries to diversify their energy sources. The war affected free world trade to due expensive means of transport and scarcity of products and it had a negative influence on democracy. Works Cited Cashman, Greg & Robinson, Leonard. An Introduction to the Cause of War: Patterns of Interstate Conflictfrom World War Ito Iraq. New York: Rowman& Little Field. 2007. Print. Costigan,Sean & Perry, Jake .Cyberspaces And Global Affairs.New York: Ashgate Publishers. 2012. Print. Schwab ,Orrin.The Gulf Wars And The United States: Shaping the Twenty First Century.Psi Reportsa. Preager Security International Reports. New York: Abc-Clio. 2009. Print. Geis, Anna, Harald ,Muller &Niklas Schornig. The Militant Face of Democracy: Liberal Forces for Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013. Print. Macarthur, John.The Selling Off “Free Trade ”NAFTA,Washington, And The Subversion Of American Democracy.Los Angeles: University of California Press. 2000. Print. Read More

 

Read More