The English Immigration Policy - Essay Example

? The English Immigration Policy: A Critical Review The English Immigration Policy: A Critical Review Introduction The developed countries always face challenge of managing illegal immigration as the people from developing and underdeveloped nations attempt to gain entry (Ethier 1986). The advanced economies are known to give a leave way to the illegal immigrants in order to keep labor prices steadily cheap in the local market (Chiswick 1988). The economic conditions of British community are challenging and difficult because the country cannot effectively manage the aftereffects of semi-permanent global recession (Jones & Macloed 1999). The national security forces are engaged in patrolling the shoreline of the country so that illegal immigration can be reduced in terms of intensity and volume. Historically, the English policy towards managing illegal immigration was quite lenient but with the passage of time, as economic conditions got worse then, the immigration policy tightened. The governmental offices do not waste much time in deporting the illegal visitors so that population growth should be kept under control. The national per-capita income reduced significantly during the past few years. The dropdown of per-capita income is considered a direct response towards national level failure of the country in making a switch from industrialization to services. The English administrators and government are notorious for their egoistic attitudes and therefore, they attempted to carry out industrialization and services in parallel while, failing to keep their cost advantage intact in the global market. The English and American products were literally beaten up by the Chinese ones in the boundary-less marketplace (Nolan 2001). The American industrialists responded to the challenge effectively by outsourcing their productions to China whereas, the English business professionals falsely tried to save their national pride. The consequences of a wrong and unduly enforced strategic choice are becoming obvious in terms of lowering Gross Domestic Product and per-capita income. The nationalism is the one concept that experienced significant level of deformation in the recent years and the English government attempted to revitalize a dying notion that resulted in a prevailing horrific fiscal conditions (Burgoyne 2000). Previously, the nation was more than happy in accommodating immigrants who had a clean criminal record in the home country and used them as a means of promoting itself in the form of a humanitarian nation. The actual cause of helping the immigrants is to counteract negative growth of population while, increasing available and willing workforce. Thusly, the immigration policy of England was quite relaxed and the gaining of entry was also relatively easy in the past. The relaxed immigration policy was a manifestation of excellent economic conditions that were known to prevail in the last years of 20th century. However, as the world entered into the electronic era of the 21st century then, it rapidly converged to become a global village. The economic interdependencies increased and nations developed growing number of collaborative contractual agreements in order to manage the uncertainty of the global economic system (Hannon, Huang, & Jaw 1995). The technology improved and helped the global economic leaders in attaining widening cost related advantages as their ability to attain economies of scale and scope developed and strengthened. Nevertheless, Britain felt reluctant towards collaboration of their corporate activities with rest of the world and therefore, experienced loneliness in the global market. Additionally, the national ability to develop and implement efficient technology reduced. In this way, the leading economy of the past failed in terms of sniffing the winds and due to this reason, it readily failed to maintain a proper and respectable place in the changing world order (Jensen 2002). The English philosophers are believed to be the providers of management theories and other modern concepts but apparently, the English community and government forgot to use the contemporary ideas in practical sense. Additionally, the English corporate sector attempted to challenge the external environment that required collaboration and openness. The England’s ability to show flexibility and tolerance in order to accommodate the changing requirements of global relations resulted in current economic situation of the country. The England’s population was of the view that they are better than other nations of the world on racial grounds and therefore, they are not required to establish bilateral trade agreements with the developing nations, as they were significantly dependent on English economic system for meeting their needs. The notion of self-sufficiency that was de-formalizing in the initial years of the 21st century, acted as a guiding principle for the people of England. The community fell into the colored and unrealistic belief that they and their economic system are fully capable of fulfilling their needs and wants (Piboolsravut 2004). The English government profoundly refused to make a much-needed currency change. The European Union introduced a common currency so that the member nations can manage their poor environment in better and efficient way. The whole idea was to control and accommodate resource interdependencies effectively. The conception of national level specialization was on the rise and the developed nations were growing into knowledge communities. China along with India was becoming production and industrialized hub for the entire world. Nonetheless, the economic specialists failed to understand and comprehend the reasons that impressed the Great Britain to take an inverse strategic position towards the ongoing changes in the world economy. The English corporate community is thus far failing in terms of keeping their living standard steady and people are getting unemployed in masses. The multinationals are planning to pack up and move to other attractive regions of the world. The technological companies are famous for operating with skeleton crew and their main operations have already been transferred to emerging economies of the world. The English society, whose major percentage of operational workforce was known to come from developing and underdeveloped parts of the globe, had been facing labor shortage. The labor shortage is caused by globalization of world economy and therefore, people of developing nations have the opportunity to earn more while remaining in the home country. The standard of living is therefore, improving in the featured regions of the world. The Britain community that was divided in two social classes of masters and slaves is struggling to find new breed of workers. The English community is not at all in the position of sustaining and helping legal and illegal immigrants and therefore, the national policy about immigration is getting strict with every passing year. The problem nonetheless, exists because Britain is stuck between the two standards of national existence. They were initially planning to run industrialization and knowledge simultaneously but as the time progressed, the local economy’s ability to hold foreign investment diminished and soon after that, the local society was looking to compensate for departing machinery and corporations. The basic decision of not cooperating with the international economic community proved deadly in the strategic prospective. The chain of events was initiated that caused a ripple effect in the economy. The consumer in the international market has been blessed with growing and improving alternatives and that caused monolithic designs of the past become obsolete in the present. The global economic competition is specifically based on cost because customers are responding to the worsening conditions and are always looking to attain substantial savings. The English products are high on the scale of quality but they are considered expensive in the global marketplace. The England’s producers and industrialists are facing significant problems in attaining economies of scale and therefore, cannot offer their products cheaply. The local producers are however, looking to enter contracts and agreements in order to outsource the productions but the world order has already been settled and vendors of China and India are previously engaged in fulfilling ever-increasing demands of American firms. The English corporate sector is suffering with the disadvantages of being a late mover in adopting the new rules of the corporate game. The undue dedication towards nationalism is believed to be the most significant cause that led towards economic demise of the featured nation. The English refusal to join hands with developing nations and not joining European Union resulted in overwhelming loneliness of the country that was identified as one of the major economies of the world in the past. The nation of England could have played a notable role in joining and knitting a stronger relation between Americas and European nations. The England is needed to revisit its basic and fundamental policy of carrying industrialization and knowledge creation at the same time. Furthermore, the nation is not in position to reinitiate its stagnant economic sector of industry. The country has to endow its resources in educational sector and has to collaborate with America and China. The nation must also relax its immigrant policy so that the specialists and scientists should be attracted towards coming to the country and play their much-required role in the revitalization. Moreover, the nation needs to provide the industrialized parts of the globe, with fresh insights and knowledge while, attaining consumer goods in exchange. The people of Britain must also be told that they cannot survive in isolation and therefore, they should not take economic collaboration as a negative. The England’s art industry is responsible for promoting peace and equality in humans but when the time came to implement the noble notions then, the English community backed off at a moment’s notice. The economy that was historically working with help of foreign workforce should not have refused to participate in globalization process of international economy. The nonparticipation of England in globalized corporate world caused the country to suffer a lot. Furthermore, the local companies are not supporting the modern work related concepts of tele-commuting, participative management and outsourcing. The Britain economic setup is in need of massive change and this has to be completed in next few years. The British notion of racial supremacy is also required to weaken in order to internalize the change that is needed to attain a respectable position in the integrated world of global economics. The core idea of self-sufficiency upon that the entire economic system of England was based, is no longer applicable in the modern era of the 21st century. The English community has to turn itself into a knowledge-based society as soon as possible and work jointly with America so that its basic needs can be fulfilled. The English somehow missed the basic and fundamental principle of the modern times that is called collaboration. The nation’s entire focus was to protect its honor and dignity by proving to the world that they can indeed exist in isolation. The country failed in this conquest miserably and currently, it is seeking global partnerships and alliances in order to assimilate in the changing world order. The country is however, believed to be little late in responding towards the perspective of global economy. The nation on the other hand, is busy in tightening its immigration policies that may hinder the goal of assimilation in the international fiscal and integrated world. The country that was not willing to coexist with others, has a poor reputation to repair and it is also needed to talk concrete steps in the direction of eliminating racism that is famous for prevailing in the society for number of centuries. The English media is also supposed to promote soft image of the country while, the people must also learn to set aside their traditional beliefs and values so that they can cooperate with foreigners who will be primarily responsible for bringing the indigenous economy back on the track of growth. The proposed change is a difficult process to accomplish but it is a necessary one too and therefore, the local population is strongly recommended to show tolerance and flexibility in order to play a significant role in the changed world. The British response towards changing global realities remained disappointing in the past few years. The political leadership of the country took an opposite approach towards the monster of globalization. The need to keep racial and economic supremacy forced the nation to kneel in front of the growing and established economic powers of the world. At the end, it is very valuable to note that England is the nation that opted to remain isolated in the past and it was very satisfied to fulfill its economic and basic consumer needs by itself. However, when the globalization started to kick in then, the model of self-sufficiency became obsolete and problems started to arise for the Royal state. In the light of above discussion, it can be established that the English policy towards immigration remained quite friendly in the latter half of the 20th century. In the initial stages of 21st century, the nation’s behavior significantly and notably changed as the whole world became victim of globalization. The national boundaries submerged whereas, the volumes of cross border trade grew but the Royal nation’s immigration, and foreign policy became rigid and therefore, the country is left alone in the global arena of commerce and trade. Findings The key findings of the study are as follows: - The English nation was one of the most influential country in the mid and late years of the 20th century The nation’s unjustifiable and illogical reaction towards globalization resulted in ruthless loneliness in the global community The country’s immigration policy was reasonably friendly in the peak times but as globalization kicked in, the English immigration and foreign policy got rigid The refusal from joining European Union acted as last nail in the coffin and resulted in dying of any hope for coexistence for the particularly troubled nation The English population has been trained to consider themselves as superior to other races and therefore, the England’s citizen was not at all ready for collaborating with so-called inferior nations such as India and China The English government failed to see the growing influence of the abovementioned nations on the global economy and in the haze of racial superiority, they fired away their plan to take on the entire world in the global stage of trade The England miserably failed in managing the international relations, when others managed to thrive on the idea Conclusion This paper analyzed and reviewed the recent failure of English government in managing international ties in the increasingly integrated world of economics and business. The immigration policies of rest of the nations, were known to melt away in order to accommodate globalization and internationalization but the Royal state somehow missed the entire point and mistakenly tightened the screws. Furthermore, the English community as a whole acted to support racism and it consequently, sacrificed their economic and fiscal interests. The English government should have taken a friendlier route towards accommodation of globalization as the world was converging. Furthermore, England’s image as a stubborn country has been promoted and publicized in the global society and therefore, it will take them quite a while to repair the damage. Meanwhile, hard reality is that, the nation will have to suffer through declining profits and increasing unemployment before repairing the self-image in the global community. Finally, the nation should lower the self-imposed barriers and attempt to play an important role in the process of human development. References Burgoyne, R. 2000. Ethnic Nationalism and Globalization. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice Vol 4 no. 2 , pp.157-164. Chiswick, B. 1988. Illegal Immigration and Immigration Control. The Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol 2 no.3 , pp.101-115. Ethier, W. 1986. Illegal Immigration: The Host-Country Problem. The American Economic Review Vol 76 no.1 , pp. 56-71. Hannon, J., Huang, I., & Jaw, B. 1995. International Human Resource Strategy and Its Determinants: The Case of Subsidiaries in Taiwan. Journal of International Business Studies Vol 26 no.3 , pp.531-554. Jensen, A. 2002. The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist Vol 57 no. 10 , pp.774-783. Jones, M., & Macloed, G. 1999. Towards a Regional Renaissance? Reconfiguring and Rescaling England's Economic Governance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers Vol 24 no. 3 , pp.295–313. Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global business revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol 26 no.1 , pp.119-137. Piboolsravut, P. 2004. Sufficiency Economy. ASEAN Economic Bulletin Vol 21 no.1 , pp.127-134. Read More