Religious and Social Imagery in the Early French Revolution - Book Report/Review Example

To begin his writing, Christopher Hudson applies the use of satire to criticize the writings of the early historians and how they presented their issues. He applies satire to criticize the luxurious lives that were led by the early French people (-337). He also satirically criticizes the autocratic nature by, which the early rich French citizens handled their workers and the kinds of names they gave their workers.
In regard to social Imagery, Christopher argues that the composition of the General French Estates as well as their religious dimensions were a great influence on the early historical writers. These societal phenomena formed the major basis of their writings. The author exhibits the use of Imagery as used by the earl writers i.e. in the “Magnificent of the Third Estates”, where the “Third”, was basically a term used to describe low-class society members who basically performed manual labor for instance: Plowmen as well as other members of the society who work tirelessly to satisfy their master’s needs. Moreover, Christopher identifies the manners by, which the French Churches and the people who were considered noble would be faced with difficulties owing to the fact that they were used to resting from their childhood while the poor were subjected to hard work as well to authoritarian leaders (-345).

The article also identifies the use of humor as well as sharp rhetoric that were used by the early French Scholars. To begin with, he asserts that religion as an imperative aspect of the early French society and writings formed a major part of historiography as compared to the manner by, which social themes. Moreover, the article also identifies that contemporary writings have not been so effective in exhibiting the social facets of the French Revolutions owing to the fact that they exhibited a sub-ordination of social issues to political issues. Another main argument depicted by Christopher in the journal is the fact that traditional issues of the French Revolution are poorly exhibited in contemporary writings. The majority of current historians focus mostly on political issues that occurred during the French Revolution, rather than providing even arguments on these issues. Consequently, Christopher focuses on the manner in, which religious issues were frequently mentioned by the early Pamphleteers (-347).

Another apparent issue that is evident in Christopher’s writing is the manner by, which he structures his work. The work is chronologically organized; he begins by providing a brief explanation of the nature of the Early French societies and the kind lives they used to live. This is followed by a definition of various societal dimensions i.e. the use of imagery in the language of the early writers. Consequently, this is followed by a description of contemporary society’s writings and the extent to, which they cover social, religious and political issues of the French Revolution.

There is also proper use of evidence to provide support to the arguments presented in the article for instance: He quotes pamphlets of the early writers, specifically those that were written in 1789. Additionally, he quotes various documents such as the “Magnificent of the Third Estates”, the De Profundis of the Nobility and the Clergyman among other imperative early literary works. Various aspects of these writings have used references by Christopher to give evidence of different aspects of writings that were exhibited in the early writings (-365).

Conclusion
A careful analysis of Christopher’s Hudson’s depicts various issues. The first apparent issue is the main arguments presented in his work. He discusses various dimensions of writings that were applied by the early historians i.e. use of imagery, rhetoric, humor et cetera. Additionally, he focuses on the manner by, which the current generation presents their writings in regard to the history of the French revolution.