Democracy in the Middle East: : The answer for a better future for the Arab World - Dissertation Example

The United States of America, thus, has but one goal when it invaded Iraq: to democratize the country and as a consequence thereof, to promote the values of democracy and freedom in its neighbor countries, collectively known as the Middle East. The United States hoped that the invasion as well as the departure of the country’s leader, Saddam Hussein would transform the region into a democratic one. Nevertheless, the expected result of the said invasion was not really attained. However, researchers argue that while the invasion was not successful in terms of promoting democracy in the said region, it has been relatively successful in terms of transcending the message of anti-tyranny and anti-terrorism into the minds of the members of the Arab World.

Evidently, the monarchs and dictators of the Arab World have been forced to take the prevailing perspective internationally as well as the power of its citizenry. Evidently, the theme provided by then U.S. President George W. Bush has provided a unifying theme with respect to the need to embed the values of freedom and democracy in the Middle East. Nevertheless, various researches conducted in relation thereto have mentioned that the incorporation of the tenets of freedom and democracy into the Arab World must be done gradually, initiated by the regimes that are already in existing or through a more radical means such as the exertion of external pressure and other radical remedies.

Truly, the case of Iraq did not fall under these two (Carignan, 2007). Iraq, to some extent, was democratized following the invasion of the United States and its allies grounded on the belief that the Hussein regime was already irredeemable (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2005; Tessler, 2002). Furthermore, the attacks of the United States and its allies were grounded on the premise that the country has failed to comply with various UN resolutions requiring the country to dismantle their weapons of mass destruction (Carignan, 2007; Davenport, 2007; Stewart, 2008).

Whilst in the course of their invasion, the United States found no Weapons of Mass Destruction they were of the opinion that the widespread belief as regards its existence is one of the ways by which Saddam Hussein sustains his regime of terror (Carignan, 2007; Economist Intelligence Unit, 2005). Having succeeded with the democratization of Iraq, the same principles pertaining to externally induced regime change were adopted with respect to the transformation of two other Arab States –