While the Mexican fought for the independence of Texas, the US sent its army into Texas in order to gain hold over the state. However, the ambition did not end here and US made plans to extend its rule into California by buying over the state from Mexico. In order to ensure the cooperation of the Mexican government, Polk sent troops into Mexico to intimidate the Mexicans. The Mexicans, though initiated the fight with these troops, had no way of defending themselves since they were still recovering as a newly independent country. The US argued that they were helping Mexicans since Mexico was basically sick country and needed the US for support. While the US was strong and powerful, the Mexicans were economically and physically weak. However, the Mexicans were able to enjoy a bargaining chip for a small period of time as the British and the French were concerned of the resulting shift in balance of power as a result of the foreseeable expansion. While this deterred the war for a certain period of time but the US was able to take over Texas and California after they neutralized the two countries through British-French consent (Vazques, 138). Author’s Perspective The author like most other historians believe that the US was responsible for the war and Polk provoked the war through his ambitious methods (Murrin, Johnson, McPherson, Fahs, Gerstle, Rosenburg and Rosenburg, 344). The author has laid the blame of the war entirely on the shoulders of the US. He blames US for taking advantage of its superior position and the annexation of Texas to start a war that the Mexicans were unprepared for and did not want at that specific point. Vazques continually refers to writing and thoughts of other historians either to support his own views or to point out the flaws in others’ perspective. By referring to specific passages, such as the comments of Nicholas Trist, Vazques establishes the fact that even US peace commissioner was against the war between Mexico and US. Trist in that specific passage blames the US for the war and feels remorse over the US approach towards the situation. This further convinces the reader of the unjustness of the situation and through such accounts one cannot help but feel sympathy of the Mexicans. Vazques is strictly pro-Mexican and this fact is not surprising given the Mexican origin and background of the author. Since almost every Mexican is bitter towards the US involvement in their personal affairs, this is to be expected. Vazques is influenced by her own people since she has been exposed to such ideas from birth and they are as much a part of her as her Mexican birth. Vazques ignores the political and economic condition of Mexico to a great extent and the Mexican involvement in the war. Discussion Josefina Vazques, through her article ‘Causes of the War with United States’, has explored the Mexican situation and the reasons for their bitterness against the US. While most historians have blamed the US for the situation, the Mexican side of the story had been undiscovered until Vazques chose to explore and write about it. Even though I believe that every story has different perceptiveness and these differ widely between the antagonist characters in the story, I still have sympathy towards the Mexicans. Certain historians believ
Date: Causes of War with the United States Summary In this article, Josefina Zoraida Vazques unveils that causes and the conditions behind the war between Mexico and the United States. The Mexicans, in general view the war as an ambitious step by the government of the US to capture the most alluring Mexican cities- Texas and specifically California…
Federalists believed that the war was politically motivated and it would not bring any benefit for the United States. The war indicated the tensions that already existed between the British Empire and the United States after the Treaty of Paris in the year 1783. Following this treaty, the British Empire was of the opinion that the treaty was more in benefit of the United States and they had received greater lands.
His speech identified four essential Human rights i.e. Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Worship, Freedom from Want and Freedom from Fear which should serve as the basis of motivation for the US. This theme was incorporated into the Atlantic Charter. These four freedoms are just like any of human’s basic needs.
In the month of June 1812, the infectivity of war spread further than the continent of Europe where it raged for two years from the past years of French revolution. In June1, James Madison, the then president of the United States, sent a war message to the congress.
Within their propaganda efforts, US officials attempted to portray former President Saddam Hussein as extremely tyrannical and a real threat for the stability of the United States and the whole world. Nevertheless, in spite of all the claimed justifications given by the United States for the war in Iraq, the strong opposition for this war continued both inside and outside the United States.
George Washington’s farewell address best explains what isolationism is: “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation.
Even though economic supremacy may be the commonest form of national supremacy that can be counted the world over, this is not the only form of exhibiting of supremacy. In early 19th Century and early part of the 20th century, conquering in wars was a major premise through which various countries stamped firm supremacy on others.
The North (Union) fought to prevent a threat to the Union while the South (Confederate) fought for independence and a particular institution, slavery. Historians have long debated on the causes as well as why the South lost the war. Progressive historians stressed that the economic gap between the North and the South was the cause of the war.
ng the matter revealed some of the reasons behind this migration process, which fall under different political, economical, and social pulls and pushes. The immigration researches came up with some of the antimonies in the current world structure in context of globalization.
Peace is far better tool rather than war. The cold war was a hostile rivalry between the US and Soviet Union which started from 1940’s and continued till the Soviet Union broke in 1991.The main reasons of the Cold war was the difference of