Of course, it must be considered a “tragedy of the commons” no matter which connotation of the phrase one applies. It affects too many people and resources to not be considered a problem whose magnitude is suggested…
Clearly, it is the responsibility of everyone to do as little as possible to harm the planet, and as much as they can to preserve what there is left for future generations. Yet, few people participate in this endeavor, and to most humans, even those who do participate, it comes as no surprise.
Pretty much everyone on the planet contributes to global warming, but not everyone has the same size of contribution. A farmer in African who lives in a hut without running water or electricity is not contributing in the same way as a Christmas-loving woman in Pomona with a 5500 square foot home on which she strings a million Christmas lights throughout the months of November, December and January. Both are contributing but definitely the excessive display of lights uses up more electricity and thereby indirectly contributes to the drain of natural resources and pollution of the ozone than does the poor farmer in Africa with a few cows whose methane laden wastes also directly diminish the ozone. The woman in Pomona most likely also consumes meat and dairy products which equal the poor African farmer’s small contribution to global warming. The farmer may not even be aware that there is such a thing as global warming, but the Pomona woman knows. She either does not care or figures many other people are conserving energy and checking their carbon footprints. Their efforts, she reasons, compensate for her lack of effort.
That is the tragedy because humans are normally selfish and naturally pass the buck on things that are time-consuming, confusing, or stressful. It takes time to separate one’s garbage. It takes money to buy an environmentally friendly car or to attach solar panels to one’s roof. It is much easier to let others do it and pretend to be on board. In fact, stopping global warming has become such a trendy thing, some people (the few who can afford it) purchase environmentally friendly products just to be hip. For instance, people ...
Cite this document
(“Critically evaluate the following statement: The problem of global Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/history/460759-critically-evaluate-the-following-statement-the-problem-of-global-warming-is-not-a-good-example-of-tragedy-of-the-commons
(Critically Evaluate the Following Statement: The Problem of Global Essay)
“Critically Evaluate the Following Statement: The Problem of Global Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/history/460759-critically-evaluate-the-following-statement-the-problem-of-global-warming-is-not-a-good-example-of-tragedy-of-the-commons.
By protecting the patients from getting physically injured, it is possible for this group of medical professionals to deliver health care interventions that could improve the patients’ health and overall functional outcomes (AOTA 1994, p. 1073). On top of improving the overall well-being of the patients, occupational therapists are expected to work with other group of medical professionals in order to restore and sustain the patients’ level of independency (Punwar 2000, pp.
Science, the journal that published the work of Hardin, described Hardin as a biologist but Hardin’s work also appears popular among anthropologists, economists, sociologists, environmentalists, and development professionals. In his analysis, Hardin developed an argument based on a hypothetical situation.
In a typical example of shepherds grazing their cattle in the fields, the tragedy starts when a shepherd tries to overexploit the resource to the detriment of fellow shepherd. The common-pool of resource is exploited by the people unflinchingly because it benefits them immensely at the cost of others as well as future generations.
Global warming involves the air, the water, the soil—all elements of “the commons.” However, whether global warming is the concern of everyone who accesses the commons is another story. Clearly, it is the responsibility of everyone to do as little as possible to harm the planet, and as much as they can to preserve what there is left for future generations.
Over the last decades, burning of coal and other fossil fuels has increased the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (Houghton 2004). Global warming refers to climate change that occurs due to increase in the average temperature on the global earth surface and oceans.
On the same note, the persistence of globalization and its underlying impacts have not been left out. Taking these and many other aspects into consideration show that society-based changes have become critical to the local and international growth, development, and performance.
The discussion here traces Locke’s provisos, issues related to property rights and labor and the relevance or application of Locke’s theory for explaining the consequences of global warming.
Global warming is especially a moral issue as it indicates an unbridled
Crops which are already under high temperatures or require substantial quantities of water, may also suffer due to further warming. The changing ecosystem will also cause a large-scale destruction of landscape, affect human
Kyoto) and national level steps have undertaken by countries to control CO2 emissions. These steps have put strict regulations on businesses and public sector organizations to reduce their negative contribution to the environment. However, these steps have added to costs
However, when utilizing such resources individuals act independently and rationally depletes the resources despite their knowledge of that such mean consumptions is opposes the society’s lasting best interests.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically evaluate the following statement: The problem of global warming is not a good example of Tragedy of the Commons for FREE!