Warfare welfare and citizenship
The three terms warfare, welfare and citizenship largely influence each other, making it hard to analyse one without discussing the others. From a political perspective, scholars regard warfare as an ideological struggle in which people try to dominate their ideas over others. More often, many people refer to this struggle as propaganda or psychological contest to implement conditions in the political arena. Warfare is a broad field that encompasses various components, ranging from military operations, through morale warfare to psychological wellbeing of the citizens. The military struggle seems to harbour all the other aspects in a war such as propaganda and publicity. Nations for example, were eager to demonstrate their military prowess during World War I and II. It involved the use of military machines, political influence, religion and social integration among nations (Richards 2005).
Welfare on the other hand entails the effort of a particular government to provide its citizens with economic security. As a result, a government guarantees its citizens with the fundamental necessities such as food, health care, shelter, security, as well as protection in the old age (Light n.d). The government fulfils this role using two methods. First is direct assistance, where it provides the citizens with their needs on a one-on-one basis. The other method is indirect assistance, where a particular administration implements programs that reduce problems faced by the citizens. Such programs include offering clean water to minimise diseases and better roads to reduce cases of accidents. Welfare in a social context is as old as human race as people used to offer support to members of the society who were not able. In this regard, welfare took a larger dimension as it not only dealt with the economic needs, but also the psychological and moral needs. This process is still in practice, as members of the society join hands to demand for a more correctly run government (Katz 2008). Citizenship on the other hand entails the legal status of a person. The civil, political and social rights enjoyed by that person define this status. In this regard, a citizen must belong to a political setting, be able to participate in social-political activities and have the right to claim legal protection from a particular legal setup (Leydet 2011). However, different philosophers have varying views on those who qualify to be citizens of a particular nation. According a particular French scholar, citizenship is akin to education. Thus, citizenship belongs to those who master education through formal and liberal learning, and later practice the same in opposing oppressive political regimes (Taithe 2001). Others assert that citizenship is a set of rights enjoyed by the virtue of one’s birthplace or nationality (Katz 2008). The two types of citizenships, social and civil clearly demonstrate the integration between warfare, welfare and citizenship. In a