For man to have absolute authority over his fellow human beings, he must enter into a common agreement with them (D'Agostino 56). This paper will elaborate how different philosophers had different ideas on theories of social contract. It is believed that, social contract is a philosophy on its own. An agreement exists between politicians and their constituents. The social contract theory is correctly associated the modern, political and moral theories. Philosophers who have had different theories on the social contract include; Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Aristotle and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. These philosophers are well known for their influential theories on the social contract. The dominant theories among these philosophers lie within the political and moral theories. These theories regained a kind of philosophical momentum as time elapsed. Recently, more philosophers have added their contributions on the social contract theories. The latest entrants being race-conscious and feminist philosophers, they have contributed significantly to the theories. They argue that the social contract theory is an incomplete picture of the political and moral lives. One of the greatest philosophers was Socrates and he made a very compelling argument. He was supporting the idea of him remaining in prison so that he could face death penalty and not escape the city of Greece as many people would have thought. He embraced the laws of Athens and he even personified them. He felt that he had to obey the entire laws because they had made him whom he was (Mandel 60). He believed that the laws were made to be followed by every individual. Socrates believed that laws were made by their fellow human beings and therefore had to be followed to the latter. In this example, social contract between people is said to be the laws that govern most people. These laws state how people should relate with each other. Plato was also another great philosopher. He is famous for his well-known dialogue Republic. In this dialogue, the social contract theory is well represented at its best. In his second book, he tries to explore the real meaning of justice. Plato believed that injustices that are meted against fellow human beings were quite unfair. He explains that justice is as a result of conventional laws and agrees that human beings make in order to avoid atrocities against each other. According to Plato, he believes that men submit themselves to the very tenets of convention of justice. They do this simply because they have the feeling of committing injustice and impunity against their fellow human being. The social contract theory is elaborated in this instance because we find that there is a common agreement between the people and the judicial system simply put, the rule of law has to be strictly adhered to. On the other hand, Socrates rejects this view. He says that justice worth having and man is just a happy person. He believes that justice has value and that people should not just take it on its surface value. Thomas Hobbes was another great philosopher who lived in the England. He lived to witness the English civil war that was waged between the years 1642 and 1648. To explain this war, he vividly remembers the war was between the supporters and the monarchy. The king preferred the monarch type of rule. On the other hand, the parliamentarians demanded more power and wanted democratic institutions.
Cite this document
(“Social Construct According to Locke Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/history/50440-social-construct-according-to-locke
(Social Construct According to Locke Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Social Construct According to Locke Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/history/50440-social-construct-according-to-locke.
Cited: 0 times
Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Social Contract According to Locke Introduction Social contract is a key theory that helps people to understand the nature of their government. There exists a sort of a relationship between the government and its people, from its creation, maintenance and finally its maintenance…
In this study it will be argued that, while Locke placed utmost importance on the idea of natural rights, Hobbes was early proponent of utilitarian concepts in politics, which informs the antagonism between their positions
John Locke (1632-1704) and his work Two Treatises on Government (1690) is also a seminal work on political thought, because he stresses the precedence of civil society over the government. These political thinkers have similarities and differences in how the idea of Europe as a “Civil Society” changed over time.
Jefferson would once say, “Bacon, Locke, Newton ... I consider them as the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception, and as having laid the foundation of those superstructures which have been raised in the Physical and Moral sciences" (‘Three Greatest Men’).
Forecasting a firm's financial statements can help both financial managers and general managers. Financial statements help the financial manager plan the firm's financial needs. With an estimate of future income statement and balance sheet accounts, a manager can tell how much financing might be needed, and when it might be needed.
Locke attempted to explain the reasons King James II was overthrown justifiably and why he was ascended by William III. He as well wanted to define the legal role of the civil government. He defined the role of the civil government as the political power and a right of law making.
Purpose of Government according to Philosophers. The purpose for which governments should exist has been a preoccupation of philosophers from the classical period to the modern societies. While Plato and Aristotle represent classical philosophers, Hobbes and Locke are a part of what is seen as modern philosophers.
t argument can be broken down into parts so as to fully appreciate whether or not we can have knowledge of the external world on the basis of our sensory impressions. The dream argument can thus be presented as (Descartes 33):
The crucial step Descartes make in his dream doubt
These hopes and promises benefit the current generations and generations to come. Therefore, Jesus came as a result of events that happened in the Old Testament. Matthew refers to the lineage of Jesus as tracing back to Abraham and Moses as well as David. He is referred to
Although Locke and Montesquieu do not use similar terms because they were removed from each other by time and space, yet the similarity between the two is founded on the principles they vouched for. These principles are largely in tune with the tenets of democracy so that it
16 pages (4000 words)Term Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Social Construct According to Locke for FREE!