Arab and Israeli Leaders: A Comparative Study The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is one of the oldest and most complicated conflicts in the world. This conflict is so complicated that it is usually referred to as an Arab-Israeli conflict rather than just a conflict between two countries…
His visit marked the first time an Arab leader made significant overtures to the people of Israel. Egyptian-Israeli negotiations ensued and in March 1979, Israel and Egypt signed a formal peace treaty “desiring to bring to an end the state of war between them and to establish a peace in which every state in the area can live in security” (The Preamble of the Camp David Treaty). Then, Palestinian-Israeli relations witnessed a series of negotiations between Israeli and Palestinian leaders during the 1980s and early 1990s. A deep analytical look at the conducts of Arab and Israeli leaders throughout the course of the Arab-Israeli conflict will show that Chaim Weizmann was more effective and successful than Sharif Husayn, while Arab leaders Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Yasser Arafat of Palestine were more successful than Israeli former Prime Ministers Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon respectively. Starting by the Weizmann/ Husayn comparison, one can argue that Weizman was more successful in reaching his aim of establishing a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. The Zionist leader Haim Weizmann was introduced to Lord Balfour in 1904. Balfour was anxious to convince Weizmann that the Zionist movement should accept Uganda, rather than Palestine, as a national home. However, Weizmann was shrewd and clever enough to convince Balfour that Palestine ought to be the Jewish national home. So, the British Zionist movement began to lobby the British government in their cause, and during the early years of the war found a sympathetic advocate in Mark Sykes, who professed an interest to liberate the 'downtrodden people of the world' including the Armenians, Arabs and Jews. (“The Balfour Declaration”). During World War I, Weizmann began drafting a proposal for a Jewish Homeland in Palestine. Accordingly, the British had exchanged letters with Hussein ibn Ali, Sheriff of Mecca in 1915, in which he had promised the Arabs control of the Arab lands, exclusive of the Mediterranean coast. Hussein protested that the Arabs of Beirut would greatly oppose isolation from the Arab state, but did not bring up the matter of the area of Jerusalem, which included a good part of Palestine. The fact that Hussein did not protest openly to the process of dividing lands for Arabs and Israelis reflect his failure and indecisiveness as an Arab leader, in comparison with Weizmann, who succeeded to enforce his plans for the Jewish people to have their homeland in Palestine. As a result of this weak attitude of Hussein, the British published a White Paper, in 1939, which marked the end of its commitment to the Jews under the Balfour Declaration. It provided for the establishment of a Palestinian state within ten years and the appointment of Palestinian ministers to begin taking over the government as soon as "peace and order" were restored to Palestine. The 1939 White Paper met a mixed Arab reception and was rejected by the AHC. The Jewish Agency rejected it emphatically, branding it as a total repudiation of Balfour and Mandate obligations. Consequently, the tension continued and even escalated between both the Palestinians and Israelis. In his analysis of the Palestinian reaction towards the occupation of the Israelis to their land, the author of the memoirs stresses the fact that the Palestinians have a justifiable motive to fight occupation. So, he did not find it odd or strange that Palestinian nationals and resistance ...
Cite this document
(“Leaders and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: a Comparative Study Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/history/52389-leaders-and-the-arab-israeli-conflict-how-was-the
(Leaders and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Comparative Study Research Paper)
“Leaders and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Comparative Study Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/history/52389-leaders-and-the-arab-israeli-conflict-how-was-the.
The Arab–Israeli conflict refers to the series of military conflicts that happened and other political frictions that still exist between certain Middle-East Asian and North African states and the state of Israel.
All the wars and the involved causes and consequences will also be narrated side by side to highlight the main issues since the establishment of the state of Israel. According to the Sowers of Hope Factsheet 2005, around more than a century ago, a small group of American and European Jews known to be Zionists took a decision to establish an independent Jewish state.
The focus in this paper is on the Mandate for Palestine is a lawfully binding treaty that gives the Jews the authority to establish their settlements anywhere in western Palestine, extending from River Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea. In 1920, this treaty came into the limelight, in 1940, League of Nations approved it and in 1923, fully implemented.
The Camp David negotiations were more promising on possibilities of a two state solution to the conflict; it was considered as the first step towards the end of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, nevertheless it collapsed destroying the hopes of the desperate Palestinians who continue to live in disastrous situations in Gaza and the West Bank, while the Israelis continue to expand their settlements in the Palestinian occupied territories defying resolutions passed.
History has it that good relations between Israel and Iran ended since the Islamic revolution during the Pahlavi dynasty. The Iranians refers to Israel as the occupied territories and not as otherwise an independent country. Fears heightened between the two countries after the Iranian election that saw Mahmud Ahmadinejad come into power in 2005.
Since the Jews had previously occupied that land, it was rather obvious that the Britons would establish that land as Jewish land. They subdivided the portion of that land and gave part of it to the Arab nations and the remaining bit to the Jews. With the
The 1948 war between Arab and Israel was triggered by many international and intraregional factors combining to form a complex situation and a catalyst for war (Hurewitz 73). The Arab-Israeli war is one of the most profound and complex conflicts of the 20th century than any other war in the region.
Many theories have been put forward, where some scholars contend that Arab women should continue working as homemakers (unpaid labour), while others have opined that Arab women should work but under certain restrictions as dictated by religion (Islam), while others speak for complete independence of Arab women.
On the other hand, the Palestinians regarded themselves as the indigenous residents. This division has led to numerous conflicts between the two communities each claiming right to the land where they reside. The Jewish State of Israel was created in 1948, and the
It is imperative to understand that the discovery of oil and gas in the occupied territories has a significant impact on the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The paper discusses the current energy problems and solutions that might exist within Israel/Palestine.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Leaders and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: a Comparative Study for FREE!