“The House of Lords no longer has a useful role”. To what extent do you agree?

Undergraduate
Essay
History
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
The house handles various tasks such as the role of handling bills presented by delegates representing the United Kingdom. Evidence denotes that the roles of the House of Lords as it rest…

Introduction

Critically, it is knowledgeable that the House of Lords was the sovereign lawmaker in the English Monarch. However, the introduction of political bodies and the House of Commons has been wading off the chamber’s roles. For example, the House of Commons adapted the chamber’s role of implementing laws. At that point, the upper house was to amend bills passed by the members of the lower house. This indicates that the upper house was a recipient to lower house thus it would lack control over Great Britain’s political platform holding to the that the role of constitutional implementation belonged to a different chamber (Great Britain, 2007, p. 55). Arguably, this step rendered the House of Lords’ roles ineffective as the political platform would draw much attention among the population, and its roles would be of utmost effect to the UK society.
The continued development of the country’s political platform threatens to wade off the existence of House of Lords since the lower house, under the leadership of the Prime Minister continuously implements regulations that limit the capacity at which the chamber can pose any influences. Initially, the House of Lords comprised of over 680 members in the lords spiritual and lords temporal categories (Great Britain, 2012, p. 70). This number currently stands at 92 after the House of Commons implemented a commission to regulate the upper house’s membership.
Presumably, the reduced number translates to reducing roles as the political bodies have implemented other government offices to overtake those roles (Russell, 2013, p. 31). For example, the upper house was the official court of appeal until the formation of the Supreme Court in 2009. The upper house acted as the chamber of implementing the final judgement. This role limited the effect of democracy as the society’s view was not represented rather than that of the ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

"Japanese colonialism was fundamentally different from western colonialism." Do you agree? Discuss.
Such, it cannot be generalized that all colonial nations follow the same form of colonialism that bears the same geopolitical meaning and practice across regions and continents. This fundamental difference in colonialism can be best illustrated in the case of Japan when contrasted with its colonialist counterpart in the western part of the world where its colonialist differences were identified in…
Longer Paper Assignment
His brother had lost his life in the conflict and now his father wanted Abdullah also to follow suit and fight for what he understood was right. He, on the other hand wanted to know what his father wanted him to do but could not ask him. He had been planning to come to the library in the search for the truth himself. On the other side of the table was an old man in his early seventies and his name…
To what extent do you agree that puritism in early modern england and wales was an opposition movement
Their beliefs were also adopted in several learning institutions like University of Cambridge among others. The group differed with the traditional clergy system with regard to dress mode among other religious practices. This work tend explain the fact that Puritanism was opposition group not only to the traditional clergy system but also Queen Elizabeth I rule. To strengthen their opposition…
'Anti-capitalism today is a meaningless concept.' Do you agree?
Capitalistic ideology organises an economic system so that production systems and mechanisms utilised to transport products are owned by private citizens or private businesses rather than by government actors. In opposite accord, anti-capitalism consists of a variety of different ideologies and movements that radically oppose capitalistic principles and philosophies. Those who adhere to the…
(no title required by teacher, make own title) Describe one of the main institutions, for example the House of Commons, the House of Lords, the Monarchy, for example with regard to what is its most important role in today's society and how history
Members are not elected democratically in House of Lords like the House of Commons’ members. Twenty six senior bishops according to their respected religious roles in the established Church of England become members of House of Lords. The rest of the House is filled by the Lords Temporal; of which the majority is of life peers chosen by the Monarch as advised by the Prime Minister, or are…
“The House of Lords no longer has a useful role”. To what extent do you agree?
Critically, it is knowledgeable that the House of Lords was the sovereign lawmaker in the English Monarch. However, the introduction of political bodies and the House of Commons has been wading off the chamber’s roles. For example, the House of Commons adapted the chamber’s role of implementing laws. At that point, the upper house was to amend bills passed by the members of the lower house.…
Is the concept of ‘global health’ useful as a way of conceptualizing contemporary health issues in world politics?
reats posed by anthrax, environmental damages, crime, human trafficking and terrorism, all come to mind when the term global health is used (Yoube, 2005). Governments and inter-governmental organizations have implemented global health policies and statements indicating that global health has emerged as an important foreign policy issue especially in relation to both national and international…