The book is very concise and straight to the point. It does not drag the reader into arguments that do not have relevance to the author’s primary thesis. The Second World War is often regarded as a historical event of epic proportions. The European and the Pacific stages were considered as different campaigns by themselves, and Hess provides a good narration of history which is both chronological and thematic. Hess attacks the US and its involvement in the Second World War in a thematic approach which makes the historical account very interesting. For example, in the first chapter, “To Pearl Harbor: The United States and World Crisis”, Hess discusses the nation’s rationale in its inter-continental interference was that first, the US wanted to protect its far-flung allies and second (most importantly, of course) to champion the democratic leadership it had boasted since its independence. Working on this example, it is clear that although Hess provides a mainstream historical narrative on his chosen topic (that is providing facts and accompanying analysis), the author dwells on the matter that the mere analysis and interpretation should be streamlined to a higher argument.
Cite this document
(“Gary Hess The United States at War, 1941-1945 Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/history/62274-gary-hess-the-united-states-at-war-1941-1945
(Gary Hess The United States at War, 1941-1945 Essay)
“Gary Hess The United States at War, 1941-1945 Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/history/62274-gary-hess-the-united-states-at-war-1941-1945.
Cited: 0 times
Gary Hess’ The United States at War, 1941-1945 (published by Harlan Davidson in 1986) is an analytic account of the Second World War in terms of how the United States accepted the struggles and conflicts at the time of international dispute…
With Saudi Arabia as an ally nurtured by President Truman way back in 1947, the U.S in its seemingly hegemonistic pursuits and driven by the vision of global interdependence in respect of oil, backed up by the Nixon’s Twin Pillar Policy of the early seventies, adopted the strategy of “Active and Offshore Balancing”
It was called the Cold War because it never escalated into an armed conflict. It started at the end of World War 2 and the battle ground ranged from neutral nations to newly independent African nations, Asia and even outer space. It was fought on many fronts, Economic, Diplomatic, Propaganda but never a full scale military engagement (Go).
As a matter of fact, there are only a few nations in the world history that have transformed as rapidly as the United States from a relatively isolated, agrarian, rural, and backward nation into one of the most industrially advanced pluralistic and urban societies in the world.
Ascertain by the British in the beginning of 20th century, an accord had been made to share earnings, but the company concealed their monetary records from the Iranian government. Due to alleged revenue domination by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the Iranian Parliament had generally settled to nationalize its holding of the British Empire's leading company.
The North (Union) fought to prevent a threat to the Union while the South (Confederate) fought for independence and a particular institution, slavery. Historians have long debated on the causes as well as why the South lost the war. Progressive historians stressed that the economic gap between the North and the South was the cause of the war.
In this regard it is necessary to go back to the beginning of the Second World War. When the war began in September 1939, Japan was involved in a major war in China for at least two years (Bradley 2002, 10). Japan had been victorious in northern