Doctrines Used by America to Limit Power - Essay Example

The federal states have the authority to enforce regulations such as laws regarding minimum wages, discrimination in employment, religious freedom act, disability act, and violence against women (Otis & Scheb, 2011). However, since 1995, the Supreme Court has limited the reach of numerous federal laws and regulations passed by congress thus curtailing their power to make unilateral decisions about the federal states.

This controversy has brought a struggle between state and federal interests. It has generated new legal challenges to federal regulatory statutes. Rights and liberties protection for humankind has been the primary role for the institutions such the courts. The Supreme Court has come in handy to provide guidelines on how the provision of rights and liberties has been spelled out in the constitution regardless of laws governing different federal states. The constitution limits government interference in civil liberties including federal courts.

There have been a series of constitutional conflicts arising through policies created by the existing administration such as rights for detainees, rights of abortion, and disability rights, which have been forwarded with a political alignment contradicting the normal standards outlined by the bill of rights (Otis & Scheb, 2011). Despite political pressure, several federal states have come out strongly to limit certain civil rights passed by Supreme Court such as gay marriages, rights for detainees, the controversial abortion rights; they have regarded them as socially unacceptable and unnatural (Otis & Scheb, 2011).

In conclusion, the Supreme Court has come out as the guardian to the constitution raising conflicts as it tries to limit the effectiveness o policies created by federal states, the congress, federal courts. This controversy raises serious questions on the jurisdiction of the supreme courts’ powers over federal states.