Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Stanley Fish's Critique of John Locke's Concept of Toleration - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : stoy
Essay
History
Pages 8 (2008 words)

Summary

Stanley Fish's Critique of John Locke's Concept Of Toleration Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Locke’s detailed his thoughts on religion and politics in his letter titled Letter Concerning Toleration. Through this letter he brings forth a number of arguments that are intended to ascertain the proper spheres of religion and politics…

Extract of sample
Stanley Fish's Critique of John Locke's Concept of Toleration

Locke argues that there is no religious support for use of coercion, and thus it should not be used to bring persons to salvation. He also often cites his concerns on the level of hypocrisy, he points out that those persons who are so quick to persecute are themselves ignorant of the most grievous sins that happen around them. These transgressions represent a much greater threat eternally than do the sins that they seek to persecute. In the letter, Locke cites many more but similar religious arguments; he further proceeds to provide three reasons which he believes should provide enough grounds for preventing the state to coerce people into adopting specified religious beliefs. First, he identifies that the concern for human soul has not been bequeathed to the magistrate by either God or humans. This argument borders on the view presented in the Two Treatises to confound the natural freedom and sameness of humans. There is no authority within the Bible that requires the magistrate to commit people to the actual faith and that persons should not agree to such an idea for the state as it is impossible for human, at will, to accept as true what the magistrate identifies as true .Their faith is founded on that they consider as true and not really what they wish. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Does John Stuart Mill succeed in reconciling the concept of justice with utilitarianism?
Justice that is balanced essentially relies on the properties and forms of freedom. Such properties are the associated “natures” of the theory of liberty, the driving forces, the spheres of influence, the limitations and the causes that make one either to give value to freedom or to find it objectionable. Dependence and independence reflect two different acts of any human being. However protective measures are required for existence of too much of independence such that a solution to “a condition for justice” may be obtained. The provision for human resources reflects two different…
10 pages (2510 words)
Hume's critique of the concept of natural rights. How far do you agree with this critique?
However much Hume is critical of Locke's notion of what is natural, there is much incorporated in the view that could essentially be described as Lockean. Finally, this analysis will close with an analysis of literature which is critical of Hume's critique. The question will be asked as to whether or not, Hume is not essentially setting up a straw man as he criticises Locke? Is Hume doing Locke justice will be a question examined in the closing of the analysis? Finally, this analysis will close by arguing that the radical scepticism of knowing, when implied to the self demonstrates to am…
8 pages (2008 words)
Analysis of John Locke's Second Treatise: Ch V and VII
This conjugal family then is very different from the political system of absolute monarchy, which forms its basis on providing one man with all the power of governing the people of the country and thus complete discretion over decisions that regulate affairs of welfare, state and property. This brings about a stupendous imbalance of power and thus, is neither in favor of sexual equality or liberal politics of the modern age. Conjugal Family The conjugal family forms the very first society that existed with the advent of Adam and Eve. Adam was born with complete “possession of strength and…
4 pages (1004 words)
An argument on "The Basic Law and the Limits of Toleration"
Liberalism strives to create justifiable criteria for determining what courses or options of actions are justifiable out of a person’s set of feasible actions, or added to improve its significance, and options that people can legally pursue (Schmitt 147). A person’s ability to make law for his or herself does not imply that the results of actions will be wise. In the name of liberty, they will begin doing weird things, in their privacies, and then complain about life being boring. According liberalism, liberty has a significant meaning only if it includes the freedom to do things that…
6 pages (1506 words)
Reigious Toleration
Just as there are these negative examples, there were also leaders who took a contrarian and compassionate position of practicing religious tolerance. The late medieval and early modern period, spanning from the beginning of the 15th century to the middle of 18th century was an era that is witness to both the tendencies. This essay will showcase how religious tolerance was the dominant stance in this bygone era, where leaders in the fields of philosophy, politics, science and religion have all espoused the path of moderation and tolerance. Jonathan Spence’ presentation of Emperor Kangxi’s…
4 pages (1004 words)
History of Ideas: John Locke
Chapter Five of the “Second Treatise of Government” entitled, “Of Property” focuses on the argument set forth from the notion of the holy text of Bible, where it is mentioned that the Earth is the property of mankind and can be used for the benefit and survival of the entire humanity. Following the queue of the statement proposed in the Bible, Locke next agues and sets forth a very vital inquisition which points out to the context that if the entire earth is entitled to be used by the human kind for their sustenance and benefits then how come a particular piece of land be acquired by…
4 pages (1004 words)
Compare and contrast Hobbes' and Locke's account of the state of nature
This means that the conclusions formed by traditional theories of natural law could not be applied to a larger frame of society. In this regard, the only thinker who came with an opposite view was Thomas Hobbes. He maintained that humans are not animal natured. In particular, humans are sophisticated systems which can be further discussed in a cause and effect manner. As it notes, “For such is the nature of man, that howsoever they may acknowledge many others to be more witty, or more eloquent, or more learned; Yet they will hardly believe there be many so wise as themselves: For they see…
5 pages (1255 words)