Western Society - Essay Example

Western Society Affiliation Western Society Question The main difference between the suffragettes and the suffragistsis the way they championed for the provision of equal rights between women and men. Specifically, the two groups realized the need of women to be provided with voting rights. The suffragettes used extreme measures such as violent protests to relay their message. These actions included chaining themselves on rails roads and attacks on prestigious buildings (Harrison, 2012). On the other hand, suffragists supported the action to give women voting rights, but they used civilized ways to relay their intent.

For instance, the creation of unions such as the National Union of Womens Suffrage Societies which advocated for peaceful approaches (Harrison, 2012). At the time most people, especially men, were opposed to the groups citing the inferior nature of women in the society. The role of the woman at the time was limited to the household setting where they played a lesser role to that of women (Harrison, 2012). From this perspective, the women right to vote was not considered as an option. In addition, women in support of the movement groups were viewed as rebellious and morally and ethically wrong.

Question 2 As technology advanced, the perception on war was based on the assumption that the better a country was technologically equipped with weapons, the more likely they were to win the war. This was a shift from the preference of the proper use of military action. For instance, the invention of nuclear weapons changed the perspective of war (Hopkins, 2007). A country well supplied with nuclear weapons could easily match any conventional military action. For this reason, many countries sort to align themselves with the best and deadliest nuclear weapons.

In addition, nations with the resources to develop nuclear weapons were the only parties to enjoy its benefits. Consequently, these changes increased the aims and objectives of imperialism. Rich and more technological advanced nations were able to control and command poor nations. On most occasions, poor nations feared instances of war which they knew they could lose. For instance, the technology available for the United States and the Soviet Union increased their global superiority reign (Hopkins, 2007).

Question 3 The escalation of the cold war was in three phases. The first phase began two years after the end of the Second World War. The USSR ensured it controlled states in Eastern Europe while the United States created a global strategy to minimize the significance of the soviets. The U.S supported countries in Western Europe that were not allied to Russia. The support was in form of economic and military aid. The Berlin Blockade was the first major conflict in the phase. The communists won the civil war in China as the Korean War escalated (Hopkins, 2007). The U.S and Russia competed for decolonization in Africa and control of Latin America.

The second phase influenced the dent in the relation between the soviet ant and china. In addition, the communist lost in the Vietnam War. At the same time. U.S allies in Europe such as France became more active in the fight against communism. The phase also experienced the creation of the first set of talks aimed at creating a peaceful international environment. However, the talks failed and the soviet were involved in the Afghanistan War (Hopkins, 2007). The third phase has heightened tensions as the soviets brought down Korean and NATO flights.

However, the soviet was experiencing economic crisis with increased economic, diplomatic and military action on Russia (Hopkins, 2007). This saw the end of the soviet control in Afghanistan, and increased calls for in sovereign independent in Eastern Europe. The revolutions in Eastern Europe caused the communist party to lose control of the region, and hence its dissolution in 1991.ReferencesHarrison, B. (2012). Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain. London: Routledge.

Hopkins, M. (2007). "Continuing Debate and New Approaches in Cold War History." Historical Journal, 50 (4): 913–934.