Art history response paper - Essay Example

Art History Summary A comparison between different forms of art has been in existence since the 15th century. This is mainly for the purposes of determining which paragone is noble that the other. The comparison between sculpture and painting has generated a lot diverse views from different people including the artists themselves. Leonardo who is well known for different artistic works does not find much difference between painting and sculpture. Leonardo highlighted that the difference between sculpture and painting is that a sculptor has to work with great physical fatigue while a painter has to work with great mental fatigue.

The work of the sculptor is usually aided by nature while the painter requires knowledge of how shadows may affect their work. Greater mental analysis and skills are therefore required of painters. The sculptor deals with shapes while the painter deals with the transparent objects. Varchi’s inquiry led to various opinions from different artists. According to Bronzino, both the painters and the sculptors require different types of skills. The sculptors have to be more accurate when it comes to measurements as they cannot cheat on the aspects of measurements.

According to Messer Benedetto, painting is nobler as compared to sculpture. Other artists who are in the view that painting is more noble than sculpture includes Pino although Michelangelo disputes the argument that painting is more noble than sculpture since its requires a lot of skills and intellectual efforts. The dialogue between Lauro and Fabio has also been unable to come up with clear answers regarding painting and sculpture. Personal response The arguments that have been presented in the article indicate that both painting and sculpture have different unique features.

Different skills are required in order for one to become a painter and a sculptor. A lot of intellectual skills are required during the painting as one has to come up with paintings that will be acceptable to the audience. On the other hand, a lot of manual efforts are required when developing a sculpture. This is considering that some of the sculptures are quite huge. A part from the manual efforts, expertise is required in order to ensure that the sculpture does not fall apart during display.

However, despite the differences in the requirements, I think that painting is nobler as compared to sculpture. The painters have to be creative and innovative in order to satisfy the audience. On the other hand, the painters are supposed to have knowledge on different elements of art and design so as to ensure that their paintings can be clearly viewed by the audience. Apart from the mental fatigue, the painters also undergo a lot of physical fatigue. This is considering that some of the paintings have a lot of details and the painting can last for several days or weeks.

Painting is nobler as compared to sculpture as most of the sculptors do not bring anything new to art. The sculptures are mainly derived from the shapes of natural object like animals. This is an indication that the sculptors only base their works on existing objects. This is unlike painters who have to come up with paintings that are mainly innovative. The innovativeness and mental efforts therefore makes painting nobler as compared to sculpture. ReferencesKlein, R., & Zerner, H. (1989). Italian art, 1500-1600: sources and documents.

Northwestern University Press.