Giorgio Vasari, "Life of Michelangelo" (1550) - Book Report/Review Example

Michelangelo Works How are these two texts different? The first reading gives an account of Michelangelo life work. However, it does not provide inner details of the circumstances surrounding his work. Specifically, the text is a friends narration of the Pope rewarding Michelangelo with great gifts and riches but does not give an estimate of the same. The second reading account for the hardship and processes he experienced to receive payment. Precisely, it is a collection of letters written in reference to his work and compensation.

Thus, it represents his ideologies much better than the first text.What is each emphasizing? Which text gives a more clear account of present working conditions?The first book emphasizes that Michelangelo did his artwork for reputation and well-being. Therefore, the publicity value attached to the work facilitated the completion of each piece. The second text emphasizes that most of his work was for monetary gain. However, both books contain his work on Pope Julius. Nevertheless, the second book gives precise information on the artist’s working conditions.

Specifically, it entails details on the delayed payments and the cost incurred by Michelangelo.How do the two texts emphasize on high renaissance artistic ideas as genius ideologies?The first book describes Michelangelo as a genius of art since he could do creative things that young men of his age could not do. Additionally, it emphasizes on his high evaluation of his work to a point that he denied the Pope to see it. The second account focuses on the artist giving professional advice on the suitable location of the Apostles sculpture.

Notably, this was a mastery decision that led to a widespread admiration for his work.