StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The American Constitution and the Process of Electing the President - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The American Constitution and the Process of Electing the President" discusses that despite the lengthy campaigning periods, the voter perceives the necessity to choose the preferable candidate, but then the constitution constrains the outcome of the result…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
The American Constitution and the Process of Electing the President
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The American Constitution and the Process of Electing the President"

The American constitution and the process of electing the president The United s attained the supreme constitution in the late 18th century and since then; the leaders over the times amend it to ensure relevance to the situations of their current times. The most affected article of the constitution is the second article that stipulates on the electoral process of the president of the 52 states under the federal government. In accordance to the constitution, the president is a member of the executive branch, but is the supreme head of the federal government. The constitution stipulates on the process of electing the president of the US, and the key factors necessary to establish the contestant who is eligible for the office. As outlined below, the script establishes the elections process and the various amendments to the constitution that America’s presidential elections (The Constitution 36). America is a federal state comprising of 52 states with the mandate to elect the president. However, the presidential candidate should win the party ticket of one the two parties, namely, the Democrat and the Republican, with all other state parties being affiliates to these two major parties. The first constitution implemented on stringent measures on who was to vie for the presidency (The Constitution 46). For example, stipulations were that for one to eligible to the position, citizenship would be a determining factor. The need was that he would declare his citizenship by birth and lived in the US for at least 14 years prior to bid for the presidency. The constitution further stipulated on the age restriction of 35 years implying that no aspirant would crave for presidency whilst below the maximum age (The Constitution 55). As a tradition, the United States holds presidential elections at a four-year interval thus 2012 becoming the current presidential elections year. The controversy of the American constitution takes bid upon who actually elects the president (Brady 40). The democratic nation poses a dilemma to the citizens on the decision to establish the actual president of the United States of America after balloting. As per the constitution, voters turn out to their respective polling stations to casts votes on the desired presidential candidate from either the democrats or the republicans with each choice of balloting dictating on the next president and vice-president of the America. However, after voting, the Electoral College casts the determinant votes which are the most critical as they tend to shelf those of the citizens (Brady 43). Initially, the constitution implied on a different protocol of appointing the president until the 19th century, when the constitutional amendments resolved the controversy over the second article of the American constitution towards the power of the voter and the electors. The constitution implemented that voters would elect their electors who would simultaneously elect the president through the majority college votes (The Constitution 45). In accordance to the constitution, the electors should be neutral, holding no significant office in the federal government as this would imply on the probability of democracy. Further, different states elect different numbers of electors to coincide with the eligible number of representatives and senators outlined by the congress in relevance to the individual state population. The first constitution stipulated that the president would come from the majority count of the people; however, controversies arose on what would be the course of action whenever the voters could not elect a candidate with a majority count (The Constitution 49). Therefore, amendments presided to the current second article of the constitution that vests power over the electors to choose the president and [if they happen to fail, the constitution expressly allows the House of Representatives to cast votes. Amendments to the constitution and the presidential election process The congress dictates on the election date upon which they stipulate on a similar date throughout the federal republic of America. The current election process abides to the criteria of the amended constitution, which implies that electors shall abide to a set of stipulations that dictate the process by which they cast their votes. The constitution implicates that individual state electors shall vote at a coinciding duration with those in the other states. It outlines that they shall have individual rights to ballot and choose the presidential candidate and similarly the vice-president with whom they should be in the same ballot paper (Brady 68). The restriction is that the president and the vice-president of the United States must belong to the same party thus their names should be in the same ballot of choice. However, controversies arise towards the choice as the constitution restricts choosing both the presidential and vice-presidential candidates from a similar state. After the casting, the electors draw conclusions on their choice of presidential aspirant and the vice-president (Brady 70). Documentation and sealing of the results prevails and the overall results from the 52 states are presented to the president of the senate (The Constitution 67). The house of senate and representatives preserves the mandate to official tallying of the overall electors’ votes from the states after the presentation in the house by the president of the senate. After the tallying of the electors’ votes, the senate shall establish the winner deserving to the incumbent president in the following year. The constitutional amendments further establish on mandate vested upon the senate to cast votes in case the electors’ votes coincide with no individual candidate getting the majority count of votes. The senate ballots to decide on the candidate to become the president although the constraint is that each state denotes a single vote (Brady 70). Therefore, the tally of the senate turns to be the determinant factor of which candidate to take presidency. The constitution also mandates the senate to establish rulings on the due course of action under circumstances that hold the president unconstitutional and in case of death. However, the vice-president expressly deserves the position but amendments remain the determining factors (The Constitution 74). Subsequently, the senate balloting process shall prevail in case the elector’s tend to neutral, for instance, if there lacks a majority vote for any of the aspiring vice-president, a two third senate vote shall implicate on the person to become the vice-president of the United states of America (Brady 78). Conclusions The process of electing the president of the United States of America, although perfected by constitution, stirs the issue of democracy and the vote of the citizens (Brady 140). The fact that the constitution articulates mandate of the decision making to the electors, fails to uphold the will of the US citizens as to whether their choice of candidate shall become the president remains upon the electors’ vote. Amendments to the American may not remain taming with little relevance to the will of the majority citizens (The Constitution 136). Despite the lengthy campaigning periods, the voter perceives the necessity to choose the preferable candidate, but then the constitution constrains the outcome of the result. Current amendments to the constitution remain inconsistent and relevant to the founding constitution when comparing the presidential voting process. Work cited Brady, Robert A. The Constitution of the United States of America As Amended: Unratified Amendments, Analytical Index. Washington: U.S. G.P.O, 2007. Print. The Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications, 2008. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Explain and analyze how our Founding Fathers meant for the president Essay”, n.d.)
Explain and analyze how our Founding Fathers meant for the president Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1462454-explain-and-analyze-how-our-ypfounding-fathersy
(Explain and Analyze How Our Founding Fathers Meant for the President Essay)
Explain and Analyze How Our Founding Fathers Meant for the President Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1462454-explain-and-analyze-how-our-ypfounding-fathersy.
“Explain and Analyze How Our Founding Fathers Meant for the President Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1462454-explain-and-analyze-how-our-ypfounding-fathersy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The American Constitution and the Process of Electing the President

In Praise of Low Voter Turnout

To them the contribution of these candidates to the congress or as the president does not really matter.... The writer says that this will avert the otherwise option of electing leaders with respect to party line, race and ethnicity (Cooper 177).... Countries have embarked in serious voter education to create awareness of the importance of electing leaders; several workshops have been organized to disseminate the need for voting.... In the event that the electoral process takes this direction, it can then be said with certainty that the problem that was eluded by the former president George Washington will surely come true....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Comparison between United States and Britains Political Economic Systems

Britain has an unwritten constitution that facilitates quick changes, the people elect the house representatives only (of common), who in turn determine the British government, while the US has a written constitution and is dependent on the electoral college to qualify the president-elect after electing legislators.... The US government is divided into 3 branches that enable its separation of powers, distinguish the control and power the US president receives once elected, and that of the British prime minister who operates in an undivided government....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

How do US elections differ from the Russian ones

For example, in the United States, when the first round of elections does not produce a winner by absolute majority, the senate is given the power to elect the president.... In Russia, the constitution enshrines electoral laws that govern all election processes.... According to the research findings, America has its own unique features that distinguish its elections from those of Russia....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Comparison Between the American Constitution and the Italian Constitution

Both had the responsibility of making laws before forwarding it to the president for approval.... This is the administration part of the government; the president and his cabinet secretaries.... This paper will show the deep sides of both Italian and american constitution.... he american constitution has seven articles.... All governments draw their structure from the constitution.... With this document, the government can connect with its people very well Italy approved its constitution in 1947 while American's constitution was in 1789....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

U.S vs. Nevada Constitutioons

president This study would not only establish a comparison between Nevada and United States' legislation but even conduct a proper analysis on legislative elements of Nevada.... The major aim of any constitution is to exercise limit as well as allocate power to governmental authority.... merican constitution is responsible for dividing power amongst various governmental components.... Nevada constitution is basically larger compared to federal constitution....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Democracy in America

the american constitution seems to be more liberal than the constitutions of some other prominent democratic countries in the world.... the american constitution was able to give supreme power to the national government; still, the states enjoy substantial freedom in making local statutes.... In their opinion, the american constitution, style of government functioning, civil liberties, Electoral College, presidential power, procedures of selecting Supreme Court judges, etc are some areas that should be improved further in order to make the American democracy perfect....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

The Unwritten Constitution

ifferent departments and organs within the arms of the united states of government have adopted practices that are considered as common law but have no place in the american constitution.... the president's cabinet is one such precedent that has been followed for ages now in the country yet the constitution has a place for it.... This precedent has been established and is followed today as a legal tradition due to the place of the cabinet in the president's management issues in the country....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Similarities and Differences between the Australian Labor Party and the American Democrats

This essay "Similarities and Differences between the Australian Labor Party and the american Democrats" presents the Australian labor party (ALP) that came into existence as a federal party in Australia a few years before the first Australian parliament sitting in 1901.... ... ... ...
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us