Reading response 25 enteries of mistakes made from slip of the tongue - Essay Example

Reading Response of 25 Entries of Mistakes Made from Slip of the Tongue s A speech error,according to Karolides (2013) is a defined as a deviation either conscious or unconscious from the intended form of an utterance. They comprise of: additions, deletions, exchange errors, perseveration, substitution, anticipation, and blends (Levelt, 2009).Anticipation Error: Bake my bike; Target: Take my bike.Error: cable of contents; Target: table of contents (sound)Error widewalk; Target: sidewalk (sound)Error: chocolate dough cookie dough; Target chocolate chip cookie dough (word).

Error: a stitch in nine saves nine; Target: a stitch in time saves nine (word).Perseveration The selection of lexical errors rests on semantic relations such as antonymy, synonymy or membership of similar lexical field. For example:Error: He pulled a pantrum; Target: He pulled a tantrum.Target: The pilot’s wife; Error: The pilot’s life.Target: walk the beach; Error: walk the beak (sound)Target: the rule of thumb; Error: the rule of rum (sound)Target: a book read by six people; Error: a book read by 6 booksTarget: leave no stone unturned; Error: leave no stone unstoned Exchange (Metathesis)Target: clean and bright; Error: glean and pright (voicing feature).

Target: officer; Error: ossifer (sound).Target: thunder and lightning; Error: lunder and thightning (sound)Target: chimichangas; Error: chichimangas (sound)Target: slippery crags; Error: crippery slags (cluster of sounds)Target: Are my keys in the door: Error; Are my doors in the key? (word)Target: I went to Betsys baby shower yesterday; Error: I went to babys Betsy shower yesterday ShiftsTarget: What kind of factors did we find?; Error: what kind of factors do we found. (past tense)Target:..

in case she decides to hit it..; Error: ..in case she decide to hits it..(3rd pers. pl. morpheme) BlendsTarget: Chomsky + Skinner; Error: ChinnerTarget: emergency cardiac; Error: emerdiacTarget: few notable; Error: fewtable AdditionsTarget: soap suds; Error: soap studs (sound)Target: brain cell; Error: brain stell (sound)Target: possible: Error: impossible (morpheme) DeletionsTarget: cucumber; Error: coocumber Target: specific; Error: pacificTarget: speech signal; Error: peach signalTarget: incapable: Error: capable (morpheme) Substitution (word-level)Semantic errors: Target: bring me a pen; Error: bring me a pencil.

Target: please set the table; Error: please set the chairPhonological errors:Target: condescension; Error: condensationTarget: did you feed the bunny?; Error: Did you feed the banana?The consistent speech errors in sentences shows that production of speech is a very complex and a rapid process in that research into the mental mechanisms involved is very hard. The speech errors offer investigators with insights of the sequential order of language production process. The existence of phonemic or lexical errors in the above sentences offers evidence that the speakers are engaging on forward planning of their utterances.

It can be noted from the speech errors that speakers need to adhere to a certain set of linguistic rules. For instance, phonetic constraints prescribe the possible sequences of sounds. Additionally, the studies on speech error have found that there is existence of rules that stipulates the manner in which morphemes are pronounced or how they need to be used together with other morphemes. According to Garrett (1980), the examples below show that speech errors also observe these rules. From the speech errors it can be deduced that elements that interact with each another have a tendency to semantically or phonetically to be same to one another.

This means that vowels and vowels exchange and consonants with consonants, the slips are consistent with the language phonological rules, and lastly, in speech errors there are consistent stress patterns. Primarily, both interacting segments receive minor or major stress.ReferencesGarrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Karolides, N. K. (2013). Reader Response in Secondary and College Classrooms.

New York: Routledge.Levelt, W. (2009). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press