Enterprise Architecture: The Strategic Basis - Essay Example

One of the main reasons why problems occur in most businesses is because the information system and the business aspect are usually not well coordinated. With enterprise architecture, business information systems are well coordinated to business operations. This enables the organization to manage large volumes of data. For a better analysis of the implementation of strategic basis, it is important to study an organization to learn this aspect (Lankhorst, 2005). A case study of an organization that successfully implemented the framework was done.

The reasons for this implementation were analyzed and observations on how to make it were carried out. To effectively manage the complexities that come with large volumes of data, the enterprise architecture is implemented. It merges the information system with the business operations, leading to the significant reduction of operation costs. Sygenta was used as the case study. Before the enterprise architecture is implemented, a strategic analysis is done. This creates the basis for its adoption.

Analysis The mission statement is one of the first things to consider in strategic basis implementation. This is usually made up of a motto and the theme. This shows the direction which the organization is heading. It shows their goals and purpose. This also serves to encourage the personnel working on the implementation of the system. A project started without a clear set of goals and highly motivated staff is highly likely to fail. The objectives of the project are laid out after the mission statement has been identified.

This is when the laying out of the goals to be achieved takes place. The problems faced by the organization are what mainly determine the objectives. These are the problems that the current system has, and sometimes problems form other systems. These problems tend to make the objectives to appear too challenging, but they should always be manageable and achievable. To ensure that they are achieved appropriately, there should always be constant monitoring. One of the main reasons for monitoring is that if an error is detected early enough, it can be prevented, hence, redoing time and cost usage for correcting errors (Lankhorst, 2005).

The manifestation of errors eventually leads to more errors and bugs, which are hard to remove or debug. After evaluation and determination of objectives, the organization does a situational analysis. This helps them determine how to reach the goals or objectives that have been set. Since each objective has its own unique parameters, it is almost impossible to determine a specific number of methods of steps that will guarantee a solution. With each problem, there is an almost unique set of steps that will be followed to solve it (Lankhorst, 2005).

The internal factors are fundamentally, what make up the organization’s profile. These include its culture, image, and key staff, just to mention a few. With all these factors present, a SWOT analysis is then performed, to clearly lay out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. External factors also play a big role in determining how the objectives will be achieved. Due to all these factors affecting different objectives, a survey is done to determine the most accurate set of steps that will handle the ones that are more general.

After situational analysis, strategic formation is the next course of action. This is the