H - L, P: Scheetz v. The Morning Call, 946 F.2d 202 Walker v. Pearl S. Buck Foundation, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17927
Journalism & Communication
Pages 3 (753 words)
Student Name: Tutor’s Name: Subject: Date of Submission: Case Review and Principles Governing Application of Privacy Related Torts The case number 09-614, AFL Philadelphia LLC and Jon Bongiovi, the Plaintiff, vs. Joseph E. Krause, the Defendant, was argued from March, 25 and decided on June, 4 2009…
From the case’s details, the email aimed at communicating to the fans who had bought the tickets of an upcoming match that it had been cancelled. However, the email was met with a fury, which was, asserted in the countersuit, as having been directed to the perceived sender of the email, Joseph Krause. The defendant did not send the email and had nothing to do with informing the fans that a match had been cancelled, and had not authorized or allowed the AFC Philadelphia to use his email address (Baylson 1). The Plaintiff had sued the defendant for trademark violation, copyright violation, false advertising and unjust enrichment. The defendant asserted claims under the Lanham Act. The court ruled that the defendant adequately pled the counterclaim and denied the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim. Case number 81-1415, Christina McCabe, the plaintiff, vs. The Village Voice, Inc., et al, the defendant, was argued from April 10, 1981 and decided on November 1, 1982. The plaintiff, Christina McCabe, claimed for damages for defamation and assault of privacy. The Village Voice, a weekly newspaper, published a nude picture of McCabe, which had been taken by Donald Herron in her bathtub. This issue published pictures of other people with most of them partially or totally nude. McCabe had not met Herron before the day that he took her the picture. ...